| Revision as of 18:34, 3 December 2017 editJalenBarks (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Rollbackers103,667 edits Format and signing; please do NOT refactor posts!← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:36, 3 December 2017 edit undoJalenBarks (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Rollbackers103,667 edits Warning: Edit warring on Template:2017 AFC standings. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :Please refer to for why your proposed ranking is incorrect. The reason why Kansas City is ranked 4th and Jacksonville 5th is because Kansas City is a divisional leader, while Jacksonville is not. ] <span style="background-color:#368ec9; color:black; font-family:Papyrus">(Jalen D. Folf)</span> (] • ]) 18:29, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | :Please refer to for why your proposed ranking is incorrect. The reason why Kansas City is ranked 4th and Jacksonville 5th is because Kansas City is a divisional leader, while Jacksonville is not. ] <span style="background-color:#368ec9; color:black; font-family:Papyrus">(Jalen D. Folf)</span> (] • ]) 18:29, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
| ::You are MISTAKEN.If you see the NFL AFC Conference standings in the official site of the NFL ,You will see that Jacksonsville is 4th and Kansas City is 5th.That DOESN'T MEAN that Kansas City because is Division leader is 4th and Jacksonsville is 5th because ISN'T division leader.Please see the standings here:https://www.nfl.com/standings/conference/2017/REG?category=conf&season=2017-REG&split=Overall <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 18:33, 3 December 2017 (UTC)</small> | ::You are MISTAKEN.If you see the NFL AFC Conference standings in the official site of the NFL ,You will see that Jacksonsville is 4th and Kansas City is 5th.That DOESN'T MEAN that Kansas City because is Division leader is 4th and Jacksonsville is 5th because ISN'T division leader.Please see the standings here:https://www.nfl.com/standings/conference/2017/REG?category=conf&season=2017-REG&split=Overall <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 18:33, 3 December 2017 (UTC)</small> | ||
| ] Hello, and ]. You appear to be repeatedly ] other editors' contributions at ]. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is known as "]" and is usually seen as obstructing the ], as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a ] on the ]. | |||
| If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ] <span style="background-color:#368ec9; color:black; font-family:Papyrus">(Jalen D. Folf)</span> (] • ]) 18:36, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself or ] so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
Revision as of 18:36, 3 December 2017
December 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Template:2017 AFC standings, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 18:25, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
- Please refer to this for why your proposed ranking is incorrect. The reason why Kansas City is ranked 4th and Jacksonville 5th is because Kansas City is a divisional leader, while Jacksonville is not. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 18:29, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- You are MISTAKEN.If you see the NFL AFC Conference standings in the official site of the NFL ,You will see that Jacksonsville is 4th and Kansas City is 5th.That DOESN'T MEAN that Kansas City because is Division leader is 4th and Jacksonsville is 5th because ISN'T division leader.Please see the standings here:https://www.nfl.com/standings/conference/2017/REG?category=conf&season=2017-REG&split=Overall — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.87.53.178 (talk) 18:33, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Template:2017 AFC standings. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 18:36, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.