| Revision as of 09:41, 6 December 2017 editNeil S Walker (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,795 edits →Tedros Adhanom: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:56, 6 December 2017 edit undoNeil S Walker (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,795 edits Warning: Three-revert rule on Tedros Adhanom. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| You removed the section about Robert Mugabe, with an edit summary: {{tq|"The coverage of Mugabe's nomination as good will is unnecessary as the decision was reversed within 24 hours."}} It was actually 4 days, during which time the appointment attracted global condemnation and news coverage, as well as criticism from multiple government bodies. Please discuss this on the talk page of the article before removing it again. ] (]) 09:41, 6 December 2017 (UTC) | You removed the section about Robert Mugabe, with an edit summary: {{tq|"The coverage of Mugabe's nomination as good will is unnecessary as the decision was reversed within 24 hours."}} It was actually 4 days, during which time the appointment attracted global condemnation and news coverage, as well as criticism from multiple government bodies. Please discuss this on the talk page of the article before removing it again. ] (]) 09:41, 6 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
| == December 2017 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 09:56, 6 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:56, 6 December 2017
October 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Tedros Adhanom, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~ 19:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Tedros Adhanom shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Neil S. Walker (talk) 23:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, HenosA. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Tedros Adhanom, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- do your best to comply with Misplaced Pages's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Neil S. Walker (talk) 09:37, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Tedros Adhanom
You removed the section about Robert Mugabe, with an edit summary: "The coverage of Mugabe's nomination as good will is unnecessary as the decision was reversed within 24 hours."
It was actually 4 days, during which time the appointment attracted global condemnation and news coverage, as well as criticism from multiple government bodies. Please discuss this on the talk page of the article before removing it again. Neil S. Walker (talk) 09:41, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
Your recent editing history at Tedros Adhanom shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Neil S. Walker (talk) 09:56, 6 December 2017 (UTC)