Misplaced Pages

Talk:First Continental Congress: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:37, 22 January 2018 editHandsomeFella (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users107,952 edits Punctuation← Previous edit Revision as of 15:08, 22 January 2018 edit undoDilidor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,336 edits PunctuationNext edit →
Line 90: Line 90:


] (]) 14:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC) ] (]) 14:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

:{{ping|HandsomeFella}} Your punctuation changes were wrong. I reverted them. What part of this do you wish to discuss? —] (]) 15:08, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:08, 22 January 2018

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPennsylvania High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPhiladelphia Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconUnited States History High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject United States History To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconUnited States High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconU.S. Congress High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is about one (or many) event(s).
A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on September 5, 2007, September 5, 2008, September 5, 2009, September 5, 2010, and September 5, 2014.

Rhode Island

I am going to leave the most recent edit by Reese1031 as it is, but I would like to see the article changed to reflect Rhode Island's participation, and a reference provided for same. If this is not done, I will revert to the previous version which indicates that Rhode Island did not participate in the First Continental Congress. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 17:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

# of Delegates

56 or 55? This website says fifty-five: http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h650.html it's 56 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Siddharth9200 (talkcontribs) 02:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

How did the First Continental Congress make war with Britain more likely?

I want this question to be answered short —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.110.251.182 (talk) 00:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Deputies from N. Carolina

Reference to the Journals of The Continental Congress 1774-1789, Vol I, page 30.

As recorded, that on this date, September 14, 1774, the two deputies from North Carolina, William Hooper and Joseph Hewes, Esqrs. attended the Congress and produced their credentials.

The article would lead one to believe that all the delegates were present as of September 5, 1774. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.49.66.19 (talk) 14:07, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Firstcontinentalcongress.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Firstcontinentalcongress.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Misplaced Pages files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 04:08, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Accomplishments

Another major accomplishment seems to be missing, namely the Declaration of Colonial Rights and Grievances. Is there any particular reason why it was not included? Otherwise, it really should be added. --Polymatheia (talk) 10:55, 9 January 2014 (UTC) I like ween — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.181.196.173 (talk) 04:27, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on First Continental Congress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 December 2017

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
208.84.138.79 (talk) 18:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

i would like to edit the day it happed

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:12, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on First Continental Congress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:53, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Punctuation

Dilidor (talk · contribs) apparently has no understanding of basic punctuation. He first reverted my edit that (among other things) added a handful of missing commas per WP:Copyedit#Punctuation. I then notified him on his talkpage of the above guideline.

I now find that he, instead of replying, has reverted me again(!), with the ridiculous comment "do not begin a revert war; take it to talk". Ok, I'm doing that now, although I was close to taking it to WP:ANI.

Let's see what happens. The WP:ANI avenue remains open.

HandsomeFella (talk) 14:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

@HandsomeFella: Your punctuation changes were wrong. I reverted them. What part of this do you wish to discuss? —Dilidor (talk) 15:08, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
Talk:First Continental Congress: Difference between revisions Add topic