| Revision as of 19:45, 21 January 2018 editBoleyn (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers307,323 edits →Ways to improve Robert-Jean Longuet: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:42, 25 January 2018 edit undoWandrative (talk | contribs)458 edits →Vandalism in the article, Goguryeo - help will be incredible: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| ] (]) 19:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC) | ] (]) 19:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
| == Vandalism in the article, ] - help will be incredible == | |||
| Hello | |||
| It was a long time since I asked for your help, but here I am again. I'm asking the same thing to several other administrators about the same matter at hand. | |||
| About four months ago, the article ] has been protected due to vandalism, disruptive editing, and edit warring. After a couple of weeks after the protection was broken, two new editors started to vandalize the same article. | |||
| To introduce you to the situation: they edited out the statements to misrepresent the cited sources, multiple credited sources were entirely removed, and original research has been included to substitute the removal. | |||
| The two editor(s) in question are: ] and ] | |||
| I have been reverting the article back to the last editorial completed by ](yourself) since the breakout of the situation. | |||
| The content that has been subject to this event are these two qualities: | |||
| 1- "Goguryeo (고구려; 高句麗; , 37 BCE–668 CE), also called Goryeo (고려; 高麗; ), was a '''Korean''' kingdom" | |||
| The two editors mentioned above are constantly removing the bolded word; which goes against these three supporting articles cited. | |||
| "Koguryo". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved October 15, 2013. | |||
| States that Goguryeo as one of the three Kingdoms of Korea | |||
| Byeon, Tae-seop (1999) 韓國史通論 (Outline of Korean history), 4th ed, Unknown Publisher, ISBN 89-445-9101-6. | |||
| Emphasizes Goguryeo as one of the most powerful Korean State that arose throughout history | |||
| "Complex of Koguryo Tombs". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Retrieved 2013-10-24. | |||
| The current article simply talks about its geographical location. However, the article stated that Goguryeo was Korean when it was retrieved. | |||
| 2- "Goguryeo has been described as an '''empire''' by many scholars", "Goguryeo was a powerful empire and one of the great powers in East Asia" | |||
| Phrases in relation to the bolded word are getting removed alongside their supporting citations. This is a completely clear example of vandalism. | |||
| 신형식 (2003). 高句麗史. Ewha Womans University Press. p. 56. ISBN 9788973005284. Retrieved 12 September 2017. | |||
| 이덕일; 박찬규 (2007). 고구려 는 천자 의 제국 이었다. 역사의아침. ISBN 9788995884973. Retrieved 12 September 2017. | |||
| Roberts, John Morris; Westad, Odd Arne. The History of the World. Oxford University Press. p. 443. ISBN 9780199936762. Retrieved 15 July 2016. | |||
| Gardner, Hall. Averting Global War: Regional Challenges, Overextension, and Options for American Strategy. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 158–159. ISBN 9780230608733. Retrieved 15 July 2016. | |||
| Laet, Sigfried J. de. History of Humanity: From the seventh to the sixteenth century. UNESCO. p. 1133. ISBN 9789231028137. Retrieved 10 October 2016. | |||
| Walker, Hugh Dyson. East Asia: A New History. AuthorHouse. pp. 6–7. ISBN 9781477265178. Retrieved 20 November 2016 | |||
| All these sources explicitly describe Goguryeo as an empire or have been described to have developed into an empire. In fact, the main thesis of the first two articles is about Goguryeo being an Empire. The same sources also state that Goguryeo is Korean, but they were not cited for the quality mentioned above for the current editorial. | |||
| The editorial that I have been reverting back into was the protected version; which was constructed by a series of discussions and debates with various editors and administrators. Something has to be done about the vandalists or the article in question. For the greater good, I ask you for your help once again, but I will decrease the burden by asking many others. Thank you. ] (]) 17:42, 25 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:42, 25 January 2018
 Archives | |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
| This is Fdinshaw's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
Welcome to The Misplaced Pages Adventure!
- Hi Failosopher! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 15:42, Wednesday, April 5, 2017 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
About The Misplaced Pages Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge
Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Speedy deletion declined: Fire and Spice
Hello Failosopher, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Fire and Spice, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 cannot be applied to books. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 10:25, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India)
Greetings,
It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve Robert-Jean Longuet
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Failosopher, thanks for creating Robert-Jean Longuet!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as needing inline citations.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 19:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Vandalism in the article, Goguryeo - help will be incredible
Hello
It was a long time since I asked for your help, but here I am again. I'm asking the same thing to several other administrators about the same matter at hand. About four months ago, the article Goguryeo has been protected due to vandalism, disruptive editing, and edit warring. After a couple of weeks after the protection was broken, two new editors started to vandalize the same article. To introduce you to the situation: they edited out the statements to misrepresent the cited sources, multiple credited sources were entirely removed, and original research has been included to substitute the removal. The two editor(s) in question are: User:Zanhe and User:Koraskadi I have been reverting the article back to the last editorial completed by User:Failosopher(yourself) since the breakout of the situation.
The content that has been subject to this event are these two qualities:
1- "Goguryeo (고구려; 高句麗; , 37 BCE–668 CE), also called Goryeo (고려; 高麗; ), was a Korean kingdom"
The two editors mentioned above are constantly removing the bolded word; which goes against these three supporting articles cited.
"Koguryo". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved October 15, 2013.
States that Goguryeo as one of the three Kingdoms of Korea
Byeon, Tae-seop (1999) 韓國史通論 (Outline of Korean history), 4th ed, Unknown Publisher, ISBN 89-445-9101-6.
Emphasizes Goguryeo as one of the most powerful Korean State that arose throughout history
"Complex of Koguryo Tombs". UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Retrieved 2013-10-24.
The current article simply talks about its geographical location. However, the article stated that Goguryeo was Korean when it was retrieved.
2- "Goguryeo has been described as an empire by many scholars", "Goguryeo was a powerful empire and one of the great powers in East Asia"
Phrases in relation to the bolded word are getting removed alongside their supporting citations. This is a completely clear example of vandalism.
신형식 (2003). 高句麗史. Ewha Womans University Press. p. 56. ISBN 9788973005284. Retrieved 12 September 2017.
이덕일; 박찬규 (2007). 고구려 는 천자 의 제국 이었다. 역사의아침. ISBN 9788995884973. Retrieved 12 September 2017.
Roberts, John Morris; Westad, Odd Arne. The History of the World. Oxford University Press. p. 443. ISBN 9780199936762. Retrieved 15 July 2016.
Gardner, Hall. Averting Global War: Regional Challenges, Overextension, and Options for American Strategy. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 158–159. ISBN 9780230608733. Retrieved 15 July 2016.
Laet, Sigfried J. de. History of Humanity: From the seventh to the sixteenth century. UNESCO. p. 1133. ISBN 9789231028137. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
Walker, Hugh Dyson. East Asia: A New History. AuthorHouse. pp. 6–7. ISBN 9781477265178. Retrieved 20 November 2016
All these sources explicitly describe Goguryeo as an empire or have been described to have developed into an empire. In fact, the main thesis of the first two articles is about Goguryeo being an Empire. The same sources also state that Goguryeo is Korean, but they were not cited for the quality mentioned above for the current editorial.
The editorial that I have been reverting back into was the protected version; which was constructed by a series of discussions and debates with various editors and administrators. Something has to be done about the vandalists or the article in question. For the greater good, I ask you for your help once again, but I will decrease the burden by asking many others. Thank you. Wandrative (talk) 17:42, 25 January 2018 (UTC)