| Revision as of 06:27, 4 March 2018 editNorthBySouthBaranof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,494 editsm Reverted edits by Dlohcierekim (talk) to last version by NorthBySouthBaranofTag: Rollback← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:42, 4 March 2018 edit undoNorthBySouthBaranof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,494 edits gtfoNext edit → | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
| :Did I trigger you? Can't handle it when someone calls you what you are? Sad! Maybe don't make racist-apologia edits on the encyclopedia and then start ridiculous ANI threads when people call you on your bullshit. I don't apologize to white supremacists and if you have a problem with that, feel free to take it up on ANI. Oh wait <snerk>. Have a nice day. ] (]) 20:40, 20 February 2018 (UTC) | :Did I trigger you? Can't handle it when someone calls you what you are? Sad! Maybe don't make racist-apologia edits on the encyclopedia and then start ridiculous ANI threads when people call you on your bullshit. I don't apologize to white supremacists and if you have a problem with that, feel free to take it up on ANI. Oh wait <snerk>. Have a nice day. ] (]) 20:40, 20 February 2018 (UTC) | ||
| ::I'm hardly being emotional and you're the one who seems rather upset. You were and are being uncivil and I'm merely pointing out that that sort of behaviour is inappropriate. Thanks. ] (]) 22:06, 20 February 2018 (UTC) | ::I'm hardly being emotional and you're the one who seems rather upset. You were and are being uncivil and I'm merely pointing out that that sort of behaviour is inappropriate. Thanks. ] (]) 22:06, 20 February 2018 (UTC) | ||
| :::If you continue personal attacks you will be reported an approprate administrative action taken. See Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks.] (]) 06:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | ==]== | ||
Revision as of 06:42, 4 March 2018
3RR
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! ==
Kelli Ward
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
please stop insulting me
I am not interested in hearing your opinion of my ability (or lack thereof) to understand words correctly. It's one thing to ask me what I think about the meaning of something, but it's another thing altogether to proffer a derisive opinion of me by stating what you think about me as a person in demeaning terms, such as you did here. Please stop. Xerton (talk) 02:49, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- It's not an insult to state that you don't know what words mean. It's a suggestion that you learn. When different people come to a similar conclusion through differing processes, that is pretty much the opposite of "groupthink." NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 02:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- Please understand the following:
- You are not a linguistic expert
- Even you were, you are not an expert in assessing the minds of other people
- But even if you were that too, I am not interested in your opinion of my level of understanding
- If you want to say that you think I am misusing a word or term, go right ahead, but DO NOT tell me that don't know what a word means. In one instance, I've made a mistake; in the other, I am defective. And that you doubled down by telling me I need to "learn", tells me your message is that I am defective. Thus, I am asking you politely to please keep your personal opinion about me to yourself. Xerton (talk) 03:05, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- PS: Please read Groupthink which states Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome. This quote exactly backs up how I use the word; but I did not use it on the page you insulted me on. I said "group", not groupthink, though perhaps I should have. Xerton (talk) 03:08, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know how you feel. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:11, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, let's drop it now. Also, I do see where I said "group-think", so though I feel that my usage was correct there, I do see that I mis-cited myself during this dialog. Xerton (talk) 03:12, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know how you feel. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:11, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Simple Request
Hi there,
I recently noticed your comment mentioning me as a "fascist snowflake." As I am sure you are well aware, personal attacks aren't appropriate here. I ask that you do not do so and apologize for the ad hominem.
Cheers!
TorontonianOnlines (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- Did I trigger you? Can't handle it when someone calls you what you are? Sad! Maybe don't make racist-apologia edits on the encyclopedia and then start ridiculous ANI threads when people call you on your bullshit. I don't apologize to white supremacists and if you have a problem with that, feel free to take it up on ANI. Oh wait <snerk>. Have a nice day. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 20:40, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- I'm hardly being emotional and you're the one who seems rather upset. You were and are being uncivil and I'm merely pointing out that that sort of behaviour is inappropriate. Thanks. TorontonianOnlines (talk) 22:06, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Doug Wardlow
Not disputing the reliability of SPLC. Their characterization of him does indeed belong in an encyclopedic article, however, their further analysis should not extend out an opinion piece, otherwise every written article would be worthy of Misplaced Pages entry. SPLC analysis does not belong in the summary section of any[REDACTED] page, it belongs in the ===views=== section to maintain neutrality of the article. I agree that deletions do not contribute to Misplaced Pages--neither do contributions without discussion. Per your request, this conversation should be moved to the talk page. Your request, however, should work both ways.
Koncurrentkat (talk) 17:00, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- I agree that there was too much in the lede, and have moved the detailed discussion to his Career section. I’ll discuss further on the Talk page. Thank you. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 17:03, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Another Daily Mail RfC
There is an RfC at Talk:Daily Mail#Request for comment: Other criticisms section. Your input would be most helpful. --Guy Macon (talk) 12:28, 1 March 2018 (UTC)