Revision as of 16:14, 4 April 2018 editAtsme (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers42,820 edits →Input sought: balance, opinion, polls, headlines← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:07, 4 April 2018 edit undoMrX (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers97,648 edits →Input sought: commentNext edit → | ||
Line 1,588: | Line 1,588: | ||
::::Oh look, someone transcluded Breitbart's comments section onto Atsme's talk page. Neat trick. - ]] 🖋 13:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC) | ::::Oh look, someone transcluded Breitbart's comments section onto Atsme's talk page. Neat trick. - ]] 🖋 13:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
::::] | ::::] | ||
Seriously, there is quite an interesting dichotomy between partisan views of media's performance, and it is clearly to be anti-Trump. There is little doubt the issues began with the transition from print to online baitclick media, and the mix of journalist opinion with news. The line between an op-ed and a news piece is blurry and forces one to at least look for the "opinion" designation, not that it really matters in today's online news. The public is also having to deal with misleading headlines like "Texas Democrats Surge to Polls, in Show of Anti-Trump Sentiment" - ! 😂 That's ''expected news'' knowing how media pushes an anti-Trump agenda. Factual news without the propaganda would read more like, ''Texas Democrats Surge to Polls Only To Be Defeated By Republican Turn-Out'', and then the article would weigh toward why the Republican vote won. Instead, they published a misleading, sensationalized headline weighted to the left, and added a short paragraph about the win: {{tq|Yet even as Democrats in the state’s biggest cities came out in large numbers, Republicans still cast more ballots over all thanks to their rural strength.}} Once all the hype dies down, WP's Trump-related articles will balance out. Right now, they give weight to the misleading sensationalist aspect of the article - basically the "fringe view" - while labeling the actual facts as fringe because of the way media weighs it. While it's expected of media, it's not ok for an encyclopedia that is supposed to publish a NPOV and get the article right using sound editorial judgement...and therein the problem lies. I came across an - highly recommended reading because if we delve into the results of TBs & blocks over the past year, we'll probably find a high number of center-right leaning editors on the list - probably all behaviorial issues but a review would be interesting. I've long since learned that Trump supporters some on the left tend to believe, and their growing distrust in media is real and justified in many instances. WP's political articles cite those same questionable, left-leaning sources - the balance is off the charts - so a legitimate question is what will eventually happen to the confidence level of our readers? I recently ] on a Sign-Post article the other day about a questionable article published by SPLC with input from some of our own editors. Surprisingly 😂 the article lump sums right-wing with racist, etc. I was hoping to see more diversity and common sense responses to my comment but that hasn't happened so far. <sup>]]]</sup> 16:14, 4 April 2018 (UTC) |
Seriously, there is quite an interesting dichotomy between partisan views of media's performance, and it is clearly to be anti-Trump. There is little doubt the issues began with the transition from print to online baitclick media, and the mix of journalist opinion with news. The line between an op-ed and a news piece is blurry and forces one to at least look for the "opinion" designation, not that it really matters in today's online news. The public is also having to deal with misleading headlines like "Texas Democrats Surge to Polls, in Show of Anti-Trump Sentiment" - ! 😂 That's ''expected news'' knowing how media pushes an anti-Trump agenda. Factual news without the propaganda would read more like, ''Texas Democrats Surge to Polls Only To Be Defeated By Republican Turn-Out'', and then the article would weigh toward why the Republican vote won. Instead, they published a misleading, sensationalized headline weighted to the left, and added a short paragraph about the win: {{tq|Yet even as Democrats in the state’s biggest cities came out in large numbers, Republicans still cast more ballots over all thanks to their rural strength.}} Once all the hype dies down, WP's Trump-related articles will balance out. Right now, they give weight to the misleading sensationalist aspect of the article - basically the "fringe view" - while labeling the actual facts as fringe because of the way media weighs it. While it's expected of media, it's not ok for an encyclopedia that is supposed to publish a NPOV and get the article right using sound editorial judgement...and therein the problem lies. I came across an - highly recommended reading because if we delve into the results of TBs & blocks over the past year, we'll probably find a high number of center-right leaning editors on the list - probably all behaviorial issues but a review would be interesting. I've long since learned that Trump supporters some on the left tend to believe, and their growing distrust in media is real and justified in many instances. WP's political articles cite those same questionable, left-leaning sources - the balance is off the charts - so a legitimate question is what will eventually happen to the confidence level of our readers? I recently ] on a Sign-Post article the other day about a questionable article published by SPLC with input from some of our own editors. Surprisingly 😂 the article lump sums right-wing with racist, etc. I was hoping to see more diversity and common sense responses to my comment but that hasn't happened so far. <sup>]]]</sup> 16:14, 4 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
:Yeah the current state of the news media in the US is a disaster for a variety of reasons reflective of American society. It's what we have though, and once you strip away the hyperbole, clickbait, and punditry, you're still left with facts. The facts ''are'' intrinsically anti-Trump because of who Trump is. He lies almost constantly. He's a demagogue of the highest order who manipulates his base with romantic images of white, post-war, isolationist, blue-collar prosperity. He's astonishingly incompetent in his current role. He has few, if any, leadership qualities. He has badly damaged foreign relations, environmental protections, and consumer protections. He will probably bring the economy to its knees. His suits don't fit, he's cheated on his wives, and he has terrible taste in decor. But yeah, it's the liberal media's fault.- ]] 🖋 17:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:07, 4 April 2018
No RfXs since 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC).—Talk to my owner:Online |
|
Archives |
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
- ...sarcasm burned calories.
- ...you knew, you would know.
- ...closed minds came with closed mouths.
- ...mosquitos sucked fat instead of blood.
- ...the good died young, we'd be here forever.
- ...my teeth were as white as my legs.
- ...more people were fluent in silence.
Five surgeons are discussing who makes the Best patients to operate on.
The first surgeon, says, "I like to see accountants on my operating table because when you open them up, everything inside is numbered."
The second, responds, "Yeah, but you should try electricians! Everything inside them is color coded."
The third surgeon, says, "No, I really think librarians are the best! Everything inside them is in alphabetical order."
The fourth surgeon, chimes in: "You know, I like construction workers. Those guys always understand when you have a few parts left over.'
But the fifth surgeon, shut them all up when he said: 'You're all wrong. Politicians are the easiest to operate on.
There's no guts, no heart, no balls, no brains, and no spine... Plus, the head and the ass are completely interchangeable!
- It is much easier to ride a horse in the direction it is going. ~Abraham Lincoln
- It gets late early out there. ~Yogi Bera
- On Misplaced Pages, it's important to know when to stop arguing with people, and simply let them be wrong. ~Anonymous
- Nodding the head does not row the boat. — Irish Proverb
- Make haste slowly." —Kikkoman
- Be who you are, say what you mean, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind. — Bernard Baruch
- Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want." —Randy Pausch
An editor thinks something might be wrong with this page. They can't be bothered to fix it, but can rest assured that they've done their encyclopedic duty by sticking on a tag. Please allow this tag to languish indefinitely at the top of the page, since nobody knows exactly what the tagging editor was worked up about. |
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
DYK, GA, FA/FP and Barnstars, all of which represents the wonderful sense of community that is Misplaced Pages | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gabor B. RaczThought of complimenting you for this article. A good one mainly in terms of prose quality. Best --PeterCRames (talk) 19:20, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
I miss your insightfulness, your patience, and your genius, Alf.laylah.wa.laylah. I hope you are checking in from time to time, and will see my post. Please come back soon. Atsme☯ 20:49, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Atsme 17:19, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Alligator garThe article Alligator gar you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Alligator gar for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cwmhiraeth -- Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:42, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Cwmhiraeth, thank you for the update, and congratulations on your accomplishments!! Atsme☯ 03:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC) I did the DYK nominationIt's here: Template:Did you know nominations/Gabor B. Racz. You might want to put it on your watchlist because it's sometimes necessary to do a little editing before it's accepted, but in this case I think that'll be minimal. By the way, you should be quite proud of the minimal attention the article got from new page patrollers. You probably didn't realize it, but those two or three small edits people made right after you moved it were just the tip of the iceberg of probably around a hundred people looking it over to make sure it wasn't too crappy to survive, and then it got assessed with a C by the bio wikiproject. Very good!— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 22:10, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Gabor B. Racz
Congratulations!For this!— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 22:23, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Alligator gar
A kitten for you!Great works!! You have improved a lot....Keep up....
The herald 15:33, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of American paddlefishThe article American paddlefish you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:American paddlefish for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 00:42, 5 September 2014 (UTC) Your GA nomination of BowfinThe article Bowfin you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bowfin for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:43, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
DYK for American paddlefish
Barnstar
Thank you kindly, User:Epipelagic. Your recognition is much appreciated. Atsme☯ 22:31, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Bowfin
DYK for Synodus intermedius
Your GA nomination of Gabor B. RaczThe article Gabor B. Racz you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gabor B. Racz for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cwmhiraeth -- Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:03, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
FA congratulationsJust a quick note to congratulate you on the promotion of American paddlefish to FA status recently. If you would like to see this (or any other FA) appear as "Today's featured article" soon (either on a particular date or on any available date), please nominate it at the requests page. If you'd like to see an FA appear on a particular date in the next year or so, please add it to the "pending" list. In the absence of a request, the article may end up being picked at any time (although with about 1,287 articles waiting their turn at present, there's no telling how long – or short! – the wait might be). If you'd got any TFA-related questions or problems, please let me know. Bencherlite 10:46, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Today's Featured Article: NotificationThis is to inform you that American paddlefish, which you nominated at WP:FAC, will appear on the Misplaced Pages Main Page as Today's Featured Article on 24 December 2014. The proposed main page blurb is here; you may amend if necessary. Please check for dead links and other possible faults before the appearance date. Brianboulton (talk) 23:24, 4 December 2014 (UTC) Preciousintrinsic beauty of sharing knowledge --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:49, 24 December 2014 (UTC) One of the best Christmas gifts ever. Thank you Gerda Arendt. It is such an honor to receive this from you!! Atsme☯ 13:35, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/Chain Moray
Barnstar Awarded!
By the way, I see you had the same type of visitor I had today. I've banned him from my talk page, just so you know you aren't the only one. Best wishes, Jusdafax 21:47, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
To Atsme
I'll definitely take it!! Thank you, Petra! Atsme☯ 01:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
This is lovely, TH. Thank you. It was a fun article to collaborate on with you. Atsme☯ 04:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Some bubble tea for you!
Bubble tea!! Thank you!! Atsme☯ 17:37, 13 April 2015 (UTC) Essay
Thank you, Formerly 98. I am flattered and honored by your gesture of kindness. I do hope we can work together in a productive collaboration in the near future. I really do like your style. Atsme☯ 00:23, 15 April 2015 (UTC) A kitten for you!Woke up just now to see Nirmala already a GA!!! Gratitude........ -The Herald my strength 02:03, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Almost, but not quite. I'll still gratefully accept the fuzzy little kitty. Atsme☯ 03:28, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Dearest Mentor O Mine, I am honored. Thank you. Atsme☯ 15:49, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Thank you, User:7&6=thirteen. Your collaboration was much appreciated. Atsme☯ 01:12, 4 January 2015 (UTC) A cupcake for you!
How sweet! Thank you, Govindaharihari. Your cupcake made it a nice day. Atsme 14:20, 1 August 2015 (UTC) A beer for you!
Thanks for uploading the pictures
You are very welcome! 😊Atsme 17:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Some dim sum for you!
A barnstar for you!
A kitten for you!Meow! This cat swings all ways, vax and anti-vax, and will accept homeopathy, acupuncture, traditional Chinese medicine, and milk. And kitten hugs. Drmies (talk) 14:34, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
Yay!! Thank you. Glad you're back, TH. Atsme 16:57, 23 March 2016 (UTC) Tipping
When you need an engineer instead
HelloHi Atsme, I saw your post on Anarchyte's talk page and just now discovered your amazing work on Misplaced Pages. Why have you not yet applied for the Rfa? Xender Lourdes (talk) 00:34, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
What goes around...
POTD notificationHi Betty, Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Chain moray eel.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on September 22, 2017. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2017-09-22. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:12, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Chris SherwinOn 10 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chris Sherwin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that animal behavior scientist Chris Sherwin wrote that insects can experience "negative mental states"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chris Sherwin. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Chris Sherwin), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 10 November 2017 (UTC)A barnstar for you!
Awwww...thank you, Magnolia677. 19:16, 28 April 2017 (UTC) Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/Longnose batfish.jpg
A barnstar for you!
Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/spotted trunkfish
A barnstar for you!
The Half Barnstar
😂 My first!! Priceless...thank you, DarthBotto. You get the other half + a whole one!! 21:11, 22 July 2017 (UTC) BlessingsCite error: There are
|
Holidays and special occasions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 Holiday Greetings +2016 New Year GreetingsHappy Thanksgiving!
How sweet!! Thank you!! I intend to make it the happiest Thanksgiving ever!! I say that every year and because of my spotty memory, each one is the happiest!!! Atsme 16:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC) Hope it was happy, now that it's mostly over!😃 White Arabian Filly (Neigh) 02:53, 27 November 2015 (UTC) Happy Holidays!Ozzie10aaaa (talk) has given you a Christmas tree! Christmas trees promote WikiLove and are a great way to spread holiday cheer. Merry Christmas! Spread the WikiLove by adding {{subst:User:The Utahraptor/Christmas tree}} to any editor's talk page with a friendly message. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year
happy holidays to you as well Season's GreetingsTo You and Yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 11:00, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Season's Greetings!Hello Atsme: Enjoy the holiday season and upcoming winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Misplaced Pages. Cheers, North America 18:47, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Beautiful!! Thank you, Northamerica1000 --Atsme 19:28, 20 December 2015 (UTC) Merry Christmas
Best wishes for the holidays... II you
Beautiful - thank you, Hafspajen. Greetings
Merry Christmas
My thanks to you......for your card. I hope that you and yours have had, and will have, a good holiday, and a happy and productive New Year. BMK (talk) 20:38, 23 December 2015 (UTC) Wonderful holidaysMerry Christmas and a happy New Year! --Tremonist (talk) 15:22, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
Season's Greetings
Best wishes for 2016 . . .Atsme, may you continue to make Misplaced Pages a better place in the New Year. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 04:42, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Atsme!Happy New Year!Atsme,
Yo Ho HoϢereSpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec15c}} to your friends' talk pages. 2016 year of the reader and peace
Thank you for your wishes, returned with my review, and the peace bell by Yunshui! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:33, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
2016 Holiday & 2017 New YearHappy Easter!
Awww, how cute...thank you, White Arabian Filly and HAPPY EASTER to you, too!! Atsme 15:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC) Happy Easter!
Thank you, Horsegeek! I love bunnies that lay eggs!! Hope they're full of chocolate inside. 17:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC) Of course Atsme! 😋🍫 Horsegeek 17:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)Horsegeek Happy Fourth of July!
I'm wearing ear plugs and body armor. Times have changed!! *lol* Thank you for the well-wishes, White Arabian Filly!! Happy 4th
Thank you, Horsegeek - I'm enjoying the fireworks displays all around me while being thankful for the rains we just had, especially considering the expanse of my coastal hay fields - the same fields we haven't been able to cut because of all the rain. 02:50, 4 July 2016 (UTC) Halloween cheer!Happy Halloween!Hello Atsme: Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.
Halloween cheer!Happy Halloween!Hello Atsme: Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.
Happy Thanksgiving!
Gobble
Happy Holiday!"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord." Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version) Ozzie10aaaa (talk)is wishing you a Merry Christmas.This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove. Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Atsme, Happy Holiday/New Year!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Season's GreetingsHello Atsme: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Misplaced Pages. Cheers, North America 15:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
Holiday card
Muhammad AliHi Atsme, could I get some feedback or assistance from you on how to convert Muhammad Ali into a GA article? Please note that there are some regulars who have been contributing to this article, and if you decide to get involved personally, it might help if you comment on the talk page of this article. Thank you. Soham321 (talk) 00:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC) and a very merry christmas and happy new year to you. Soham321 (talk) 00:15, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Merry Christmas 2016"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord." Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version) Tito Dutta (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove. --Tito Dutta (talk) 15:51, 24 December 2016 (UTC) Happy HolidaysHello Atsme: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Misplaced Pages. Cheers, Samsara 15:54, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
I know this is terribly lazy, but there is so much else to do! A good one to you and yours! Samsara 15:54, 24 December 2016 (UTC) Yet another
Merry
--RexxS (talk) 16:12, 24 December 2016 (UTC) Oi!, Marine Boy, me ol' china ...Martinevans123 ... sends you ... ... warmest seasonal wishes for ... Hoping that Christmas may bless you with peace, love and understanding... and wishing that you may find your true star... !! Season's GreetingsHello Atsme: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Misplaced Pages. Cheers, Doug Weller talk 16:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Season's greetingsHi Atsme, many thanks for the card, and a very Merry Christmas to you too. Best, SarahSV 17:02, 24 December 2016 (UTC) Yo Ho HoϢereSpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec16a}} to your friends' talk pages. Merry, merry!From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 19:51, 24 December 2016 (UTC) Seasons Greetings!Hello Atsme: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Misplaced Pages. Cheers, -- Dane 08:27, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Holiday Greetings! Atsme
Belated Holiday Greetings
2017 Holiday Greetings & 2018 New YearHappy happy!
Happy New Year, Atsme!Happy New Year!Atsme, Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy New Year Happy New Year!
Happy Easter!
Thank you White Arabian Filly. I hope you had a Blessed holiday, too!! 02:53, 17 April 2017 (UTC) Halloween cheer!Happy Halloween!Hello Atsme: Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.
Halloween cheer!Happy Halloween!Hello Atsme: Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.
Happy thanksgiving
Happy Thanksgiving!
Happy Turkey Day
Happy turkey day
Holiday Cheer + a barnstar
Happy Saturnalia!
Merry Christmas!
No fancy template...Atsme, but just but to wish you happy holidays and all the best for 2018. It's probably a lot warmer where I am than where you are 😎 Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:44, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Season's greetingsHi Atsme, thank you for the lovely card. I would never have guessed that it was a Christmas tree worm! They're beautiful. Anyway, Merry Christmas to you and wishing you all the best for the New Year. SarahSV 22:17, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
Merry Christmas! Merry Christmas Atsme!!
Seasons' Greetings...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:45, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!~~~ Merry Christmas! ~~~Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten! ¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua! God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus! Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce! Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством! Hello, Atsme! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Misplaced Pages! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Merry Christmas!~~~ Merry Christmas! ~~~Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten! ¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua! God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus! Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce! Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством! Hello, Atsme! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Misplaced Pages! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
Thank you, Dawnleelynn!! Hoping 2018 will be a fun and productive New Year for us all!! 05:36, 24 December 2017 (UTC) HH!
Awww, thank you Rosiestep!! Hope Santa brings you everything you wished for, and that the New Year rewards your efforts with much success and happiness!! 05:33, 24 December 2017 (UTC) Yet another
Merry
--RexxS (talk) 01:31, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Nadolig Llawen a Blwyddyn Newydd DdaMartinevans123 ... sends you ... ... warmest seasonal wishes for ...... Nadolig Llawen a Blwyddyn Newydd Dda. Hoping that Christmas may bless you with peace, love and understanding... and wishing that you have a good run in 2018!! Yo Ho HoϢereSpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec17a}}~~~~ to your friends' talk pages. ϢereSpielChequers 18:29, 24 December 2017 (UTC) HNY
Blwyddyn Newydd DdaBlwyddyn Newydd Dda!Atsme,
Happy New Year, Atsme!Happy New Year!Atsme, Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy New Year!Thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! North America 13:15, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
|
Precious three years!
Three years! |
---|
Had to be OTD ;) - card improved but still needs more decoration, look at Puer natus est nobis --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt, thank you sweetie pie. I love your "Precious" gems. Just one question - in 2014, you adorned my page with the 3 yr. precious gem. Has time stood still? *lol* 17:16, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- I am perhaps too brief: in 2014 I found you precious, still on this page, but collapsed, therefore I sent the reminder that it was three years ago. It's forever ;) - Did Texas see my green heart? (There will more tomorrow, but a start is made.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Ohhhh...now I understand. Love it even more. 17:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- I am perhaps too brief: in 2014 I found you precious, still on this page, but collapsed, therefore I sent the reminder that it was three years ago. It's forever ;) - Did Texas see my green heart? (There will more tomorrow, but a start is made.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
An incredible award from MONGO
The best from the best!! Couldn't have come at a better time, MONGO!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by atsme (talk • contribs) 13:00, February 26, 2018 (UTC)
Miriam Makeba |
---|
- For your fish adoration, a song without words with thanks --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:39, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, Gerda. I found the original African version of The Lion Sleeps Tonight sung by Miriam Makeba - her range gives me goosebumps. 00:59, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- For your fish adoration, a song without words with thanks --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:39, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Beb
Hello Atsme. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Beb, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The A11 content was a recent overturn of a redirect, so let's just return to a redirect. I'm going to point it to Babi (mythology) which seems to be the intent. Thank you. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:25, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
I do believe I owe you an apology
We have our disagreements, and I have complaints (some rather harsh) about some of the arguments you've used. But over the past few weeks, I've really come to understand how frustrating it is to be in your position and to have to contend with the level of bullshit that seems to have become the norm in those article the past few months. I should probably have cut you a bit more slack than I did. It's not fair to expect someone to deal with that level of tendentiousness all day and still expect them to give calm, reasoned and well-considered responses to everything.
My only reservation in extending this apology is that I would just ask that you try to bear in mind that -all political views aside- I really care more about getting our articles on point than in presenting an image of the subject that agrees with my own views. If you and I come to grips over something to do with Trump, please remember that I'm not unwilling to change my mind, I just need a good reason to do it. For my part, I will do my damndest to remember that I shouldn't expect an Intelligence Squared-level response from every harried editor in controversial subjects.
In truth, I feel partially responsible for the degeneration of Trump-related articles. There was a still-severe-if-less-so level of fighting going on in those articles a year ago, but then there came a string of AE and ANI cases in which tendentious editors on the pro-Trump side were brought to task for their behavior. In each case, I supported those sanctions, and while I don't regret that, I am looking back now and seeing that the presence of a sizeable pro-Trump 'bloc' as it were served as a damper on the level of tendentiousness engaged in by the anti-Trump set. With a handful of the most prolific right-wing editors now missing from that topic, the care and thoughtfulness of the left has degenerated to the point where I'm unwilling to even involve myself in those articles any more.
I've noticed that many of the more thoughtful editors in politics, like Masem, MelanieN, TFD and JFG all either stay away from Trump articles or only show up from time to time to weigh in before disappearing again. I can't say as I blame them, as I'm planning on unwatching all of the Trump-related pages and washing my hands of the matter. In five years, we will be able to revisit the subject when emotions are not quite so high, and perhaps fix things at that point. I would ask that you follow me in this, though of course that's not a condition to my apology above. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 00:32, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- I agree, and thank you kindly. 00:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Both of you, I'm so happy to see this! --Tryptofish (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Me, too!! Whistle Britches is my hero template maker!! 🤣 17:32, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Both of you, I'm so happy to see this! --Tryptofish (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- I agree, and thank you kindly. 00:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
A typical week at NPOV/N
I've never seen so many different interpretations of NPOV policy than what I've seen this year, and we're only in the 3rd month. I've never before realized there were so many people who took a journalist's opinion at face value...(qualifier) as long it agrees with their POV. It's comically entertaining...🤡🎪🎢🎡🎠. Spectators sit quietly on the sidelines, and all one hears is the crunch of 🍿🍿🍿 as 👀 👀 👀 swipe swiftly back and forth reading the comments. One can almost hear the 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 by the supporters in each camp, along with the crackle of relentless 👉🏻👉👉🏼👉🏿 👈👈🏿👈🏽👈🏻, the strong smell of bull💩, and the slicing of air from multiple finger launches 🖕🏻🖕🖕🏽👆🏿. When all is said and done, everyone goes back to their corners 🥊🥊 and a new day begins . Rinse & repeat as soon as the sun rises. 01:59, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah I have been a sideline sitter on that whole mess. My goodness. PackMecEng (talk) 02:18, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- The problem is bias; plain and simple. Everybody has theirs, and I can count the number of Wikipedians willing to edit against their own bias on one hand. With fingers to spare. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 13:19, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- I came to the conclusion a long time ago that most of the content noticeboards are for the most part a waste of time, with NPOVN being the worst. Editors post there hoping to get uninvolved guidance about what content does or does not comply with policy. What they get instead are endless arguments with no discernible resolution (unless the issue is overwhelmingly one-sided). If the problem is misbehavior by other editors at a page, it's better to go to a dispute resolution noticeboard if one wants an actual result. If the problem is purely one of differing opinions about content, an RfC is a better option. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:33, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
What they get instead are endless arguments with no discernible resolution (unless the issue is overwhelmingly one-sided).
"unless" is a funny way of spelling "even if"...- I really did mean what I said above. Even otherwise very good editors all have POVs they just can't part with. Even editors whose POVs are "everyone/everything sucks/is awesome" will pick a stance on some disagreement and just stick to it, no matter what. It's actually a shame whenever a clear answer does come out of it, because clear answers just embolden everyone on the "right" side and fuel resentment in the few who are on the "wrong" side. This happens everywhere, but I'm fairly certain that NPOV/N is about the most pointless board, because it's destined to happen in almost every thread. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 22:58, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- "Even if...": you may well be right! I think you oversimplify when you say all editors. (Well, maybe all except me! ) I think I've made my personal POV about Trump very clear, but I have multiple times argued against proposals that would portray him negatively (although that's getting harder and harder, I'll admit). But I do agree with you that we all have POVs that we do not fully recognize in ourselves. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:15, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- An even better example: I am 100% four-square opposed to creationism, but if one looks at the history of the Creation Museum page, I've repeatedly defended it against other editors who wanted to portray it negatively. That's going about as much as possible in the opposite direction from what I would want to do if expressing my own opinion. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:19, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- There are some good editors, and most of them are liberal and skeptics (Sorry, Atsme!) or apolitical (in the sense of never editing politics) and skeptics. But even most of the skeptics are just as bad. I've been put on blast for saying that "practitioner of pseudoscience" is better than "brazen practitioner of obvious pseudoscience". And the thing is mostly that it varies: On one subject, an editor might be perfectly reasonable. But on another they're a hard-liner for the most popular view (at least the most popular view here). I'm an atheist and I've found myself defending a Christian POV more often than attacking it, unless you count my reverts of pro-Christian drive-by edits.
- I have a rule of thumb: No-one who tells you they're neutral is. Any editor who claims to be bias free is mired in their own bias, and any editor who claims to have no opinion on a subject they regularly edit in has immutable opinions. Only about 25% of those few editors who will happily admit to having opinions but insist that they try to edit neutrally are actually any good at being objective.
- It's really not much of a complaint, because it's basic human nature to be this way. But the number of truly objective people I know in real life led me to believe that WP would be full of them. Nope. Not even close. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 23:59, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- I agree with you about that. I think that Misplaced Pages, as a crowd-sourced project, is almost always at its worst when covering current events having to do with politics or opinions. What's the atomic weight of barium? We've got that. What year was the Magna Carta? We've got that. How should one describe Donald Trump? Better look somewhere else. --Tryptofish (talk) 16:28, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- I know, and we could fix it with policy changes, but there's no support for that because fixing it means editors don't get to push their POV onto those articles. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 16:34, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- Amen - enjoyed reading this discussion, and have come back to re-read it several times. 16:08, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- I know, and we could fix it with policy changes, but there's no support for that because fixing it means editors don't get to push their POV onto those articles. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 16:34, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- I agree with you about that. I think that Misplaced Pages, as a crowd-sourced project, is almost always at its worst when covering current events having to do with politics or opinions. What's the atomic weight of barium? We've got that. What year was the Magna Carta? We've got that. How should one describe Donald Trump? Better look somewhere else. --Tryptofish (talk) 16:28, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- I came to the conclusion a long time ago that most of the content noticeboards are for the most part a waste of time, with NPOVN being the worst. Editors post there hoping to get uninvolved guidance about what content does or does not comply with policy. What they get instead are endless arguments with no discernible resolution (unless the issue is overwhelmingly one-sided). If the problem is misbehavior by other editors at a page, it's better to go to a dispute resolution noticeboard if one wants an actual result. If the problem is purely one of differing opinions about content, an RfC is a better option. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:33, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Balance and neutrality
A seesaw teaches weight and balance.
Scuba diving teaches neutral buoyancy; i.e., the balance that keeps you a safe distance from the top and bottom.
What does a merry-go-round teach? The more one spins, the more likely the chance of losing all sense of weight and balance.
Spinning = 0 balance + 0 weight. Perhaps there's a message in that equation. 01:40, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
- Speaking of "spin"...not sure how I came across this Signpost article, but I believe it somehow began right after reviewing Thomas McGuane. I may have checked the editor who added the image/was making updates to that BLP. Long story short, the Signpost article made me think of EEng. 00:47, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Stephen Miller (political advisor)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stephen Miller (political advisor). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
my name
Hi.
I have been meaning to ask this question since a long time now, to many editors who have referred to me as Kiran. You are the one who did it recently, so here I go: Is it very obvious that Kiran is a person's name? I thought most of the people outside India wouldnt be aware of that. I also wanted to ask you, what do you use AWB for in relation with NPP/R? —usernamekiran(talk) 18:19, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) I don't know if this is what Atsme would reply, but I've always assumed that when your username essentially says "username: Kiran", it's reasonable for editors to refer to you as Kiran, much as they refer to me as Trypto or Tryp, and so forth. Obviously, that's not really my name, and Kiran might or might not be your real name, but it's reasonable to assume it as a sort of Wiki-nickname. Of course, you are always free to request that editors address you in some other way. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:33, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- What Tryp said about your user name, and I will be happy to call you whatever you prefer. Re:AWB...I haven't progressed much beyond what I explained before because I got sidetracked by the generate-diffs.js that I stumbled upon at User:GoldenRing#Scripts. I have been using that feature frequently. I process information slowly but once it takes hold, it takes on the characteristics of a zebra mussel colony. AWB appears to be a bit more complicated so until I've had a chance to actually apply it on a regular basis, I don't feel comfortable about commenting on it regarding its benefits for NPP. 23:12, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- hmmm. My real names is Kiran. I dont mind people calling me by it. I was just curious about how "western people" know about it. Tryptofish's comment makes sense. Maybe they dont know that its a valid/legit name, but simply assume i want to referred that way. Actually, Kiran (given name) is sort of well-known I guess. Regarding AWB, I somehow missed your last reply even though I had received a notification. Yes, it is complicated tool; but once one gets friendly with it, it is extremely useful. But cosmetic edits is something that is frowned upon I think. When I first tried to edit with AWB all I could think of was "eh...?" I was too lazy to go through manual, so i did almost no edits (even though i used to try) till I started to tag articles with WP:MAFIA's banner. While doing it, and while nagging Primefac a lot, I learned a few things about AWB. Still no manual reading. And as I kept on using it, I started to find many more functions good for my usecases. Regarding emoticons, I use only {{smiley}} because it is parsed properly on all devices, aming few other reasons. Please feel free to ask anything about AWB. I still know very little about it, but finding an answer for you will teach me something new for sure. —usernamekiran(talk) 00:47, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- I have good friends from India who taught me a little about the culture. Our families were very close, traveled together, and did all sorts of fun & crazy things. Rishi could have been a stand-up comedian but opted to be a jeweler instead. Fun times. Thank you for your offer to help with AWB. 04:20, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Usernamekiran: Bear in mind that the west has the name Kiran also, as a derivative from Ciarán, often spelt as Kieren or similar, it is very common throughout the UK, USA and diaspora. I know people called Kiran who have no idea that their name sounds/is the same as the name of Indian origin. Prince of Thieves (talk) 13:27, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Prince of Thieves: Hi. Actually Kieran is common in UK/surrounding area. It has origin in Gaeilge language (I am very good at that language btw ). Thats why I used to think they might not realise Kiran is a valid name as well. Not just origin, but their meaning is totally different too. Kieran is anglicised version of Ciarán, both of which mean "dark haired one"; masculine version of Ciara. Where as Kiran has origin in Sanskrit (another language that I am familiar with), word-to-word literal translation is "ray"; unlike the "ray of light" as stated in the article. —usernamekiran(talk) 13:47, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- Yes good point that. I think most people would barely notice the spelling variation at first glance if they know a variation of the name, and it's worth noting even our article says of Ciarán
It is anglicised in various ways: Ciaran, Kieran, Keiran, Keiron, Keiren, Kieren, Keeran, Kyran, Kiran, Kyron, etc.
so I wouldn't worry too much about people not recognising it as a 'name' name. Though I don't know how common each of these variations is. Prince of Thieves (talk) 13:55, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- Yes good point that. I think most people would barely notice the spelling variation at first glance if they know a variation of the name, and it's worth noting even our article says of Ciarán
- @Prince of Thieves: Hi. Actually Kieran is common in UK/surrounding area. It has origin in Gaeilge language (I am very good at that language btw ). Thats why I used to think they might not realise Kiran is a valid name as well. Not just origin, but their meaning is totally different too. Kieran is anglicised version of Ciarán, both of which mean "dark haired one"; masculine version of Ciara. Where as Kiran has origin in Sanskrit (another language that I am familiar with), word-to-word literal translation is "ray"; unlike the "ray of light" as stated in the article. —usernamekiran(talk) 13:47, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Usernamekiran: Bear in mind that the west has the name Kiran also, as a derivative from Ciarán, often spelt as Kieren or similar, it is very common throughout the UK, USA and diaspora. I know people called Kiran who have no idea that their name sounds/is the same as the name of Indian origin. Prince of Thieves (talk) 13:27, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- I have good friends from India who taught me a little about the culture. Our families were very close, traveled together, and did all sorts of fun & crazy things. Rishi could have been a stand-up comedian but opted to be a jeweler instead. Fun times. Thank you for your offer to help with AWB. 04:20, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- hmmm. My real names is Kiran. I dont mind people calling me by it. I was just curious about how "western people" know about it. Tryptofish's comment makes sense. Maybe they dont know that its a valid/legit name, but simply assume i want to referred that way. Actually, Kiran (given name) is sort of well-known I guess. Regarding AWB, I somehow missed your last reply even though I had received a notification. Yes, it is complicated tool; but once one gets friendly with it, it is extremely useful. But cosmetic edits is something that is frowned upon I think. When I first tried to edit with AWB all I could think of was "eh...?" I was too lazy to go through manual, so i did almost no edits (even though i used to try) till I started to tag articles with WP:MAFIA's banner. While doing it, and while nagging Primefac a lot, I learned a few things about AWB. Still no manual reading. And as I kept on using it, I started to find many more functions good for my usecases. Regarding emoticons, I use only {{smiley}} because it is parsed properly on all devices, aming few other reasons. Please feel free to ask anything about AWB. I still know very little about it, but finding an answer for you will teach me something new for sure. —usernamekiran(talk) 00:47, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- What Tryp said about your user name, and I will be happy to call you whatever you prefer. Re:AWB...I haven't progressed much beyond what I explained before because I got sidetracked by the generate-diffs.js that I stumbled upon at User:GoldenRing#Scripts. I have been using that feature frequently. I process information slowly but once it takes hold, it takes on the characteristics of a zebra mussel colony. AWB appears to be a bit more complicated so until I've had a chance to actually apply it on a regular basis, I don't feel comfortable about commenting on it regarding its benefits for NPP. 23:12, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Plea
Atsme, please consider taking a break from the politics articles. You're close to getting shown the door IMO and it really would be better if you voluntarily withdraw for a while and come back with a fresh outlook. SPECIFICO talk 03:07, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- In other words she disagrees with yours and similar opinions about how these articles are focused an has voiced concerns about bias an a the violations of undue weight and NPOV so she is not welcome since she has a different opinion.--MONGO 03:54, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- Noop. SPECIFICO talk 03:56, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- No I completely agree with Mongo, the hostility on anything even remotely connected to the current USA administration is appalling. Prince of Thieves (talk) 04:03, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- I think what I and many other editors are patiently awaiting is "the awakening" that will occur in March-April, and will hopefully inspire a major clean-up. We're already seeing the beginning stages with the firing of Andrew McCabe on Friday. More corruption is coming to light as IG Horowitz uncovers rather damning evidence of bias and bad actors in the FBI, including concerns about the FISA court and the judge who recused himself after the Flynn case...the Strzock-Page fiasco...Bruce & Nellie Ohr's connection to Fusion GPS...the leaks by Comey...and so much more. Time will tell...and once again we will be reminded why editors should pay closer attention to RECENTISM and strict adherence to NPOV...a policy that
is non-negotiable, and the principles upon which it is based cannot be superseded by other policies or guidelines, nor by editor consensus.
10:47, 17 March 2018 (UTC)- Atsme, consider the nature of evidence. Even if all your conspiracy theories were true, western civilization has developed a remarkable legal system based on adversarial examination of evidence. Have a look. At this book. https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre . Whiny complaints stop at the courthouse door. Unless, of course, the investigation gets shut down before there's any finding of fact. Anyway, next time a conspiracy theory pops into your head, go back to the bible and think about how the facts are determined in the US. And remember, some Mexicans are good people, I assume. https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre . I'm done. Good luck.
- SPECIFICO talk 15:40, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- I'm beginning to worry about you, SPECIFICO. Facts are not conspiracy theories - McCabe actually was fired. You're conflating facts with the left's conspiracy theories about Russian collusion, the laughable dossier with its unverifiable allegations...and on and on. I'm beginning to believe there really is such a thing as Trump derangement syndrome. When I log in to WP, I'm wearing flame-retardant underwear and bias repellent. I think it would do you a world of good if you'd try a bit of research diversification so you're not reading the same fake news over and over - maybe take some time off to clear your head...and lay off the Koolaid and laetrile that keeps you hopping - the toxic affects are irreversible. 16:09, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- Out of curiosity, could you please explain to me your understanding of why Andrew McCabe was fired? MastCell 19:26, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, MastCell - I've been outside enjoying 80 degree temps, and the smell of fresh cut grass. Let's see...McCabe...my understanding is that he was not "forthcoming" (which I think means he lied either by omission or fudging) during an internal investigation. If my memory serves, it was related to the way he handled the Clinton investigation and his responses to questioning. The FBI recommended firing, and passed the baton to Sessions. Knowing how cautious Sessions is about everything (mostly protecting his own reputation), the fact that he actually took action leads to all kinds of speculation, and plays right into the hands of RECENTISM; therefore, any material that is added should be limited to statements of fact with inline citations, and let things cure for a while. I'm sure MSM will have a field day with it and I hope editors will be patient and not start adding a bunch of POV accusations and speculation based on journalistic opinion and what they "think" happened. 21:03, 17 March 2018 (UTC) For your reading pleasure, if you haven't read it already. It kinda lays the foundation. 22:17, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- MSM, really? Facepalm. However, the DAB page MSM offers some entertaining alternatives. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:58, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- MSM, really? Facepalm. However, the DAB page MSM offers some entertaining alternatives. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:58, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, MastCell - I've been outside enjoying 80 degree temps, and the smell of fresh cut grass. Let's see...McCabe...my understanding is that he was not "forthcoming" (which I think means he lied either by omission or fudging) during an internal investigation. If my memory serves, it was related to the way he handled the Clinton investigation and his responses to questioning. The FBI recommended firing, and passed the baton to Sessions. Knowing how cautious Sessions is about everything (mostly protecting his own reputation), the fact that he actually took action leads to all kinds of speculation, and plays right into the hands of RECENTISM; therefore, any material that is added should be limited to statements of fact with inline citations, and let things cure for a while. I'm sure MSM will have a field day with it and I hope editors will be patient and not start adding a bunch of POV accusations and speculation based on journalistic opinion and what they "think" happened. 21:03, 17 March 2018 (UTC) For your reading pleasure, if you haven't read it already. It kinda lays the foundation. 22:17, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- Out of curiosity, could you please explain to me your understanding of why Andrew McCabe was fired? MastCell 19:26, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- I'm beginning to worry about you, SPECIFICO. Facts are not conspiracy theories - McCabe actually was fired. You're conflating facts with the left's conspiracy theories about Russian collusion, the laughable dossier with its unverifiable allegations...and on and on. I'm beginning to believe there really is such a thing as Trump derangement syndrome. When I log in to WP, I'm wearing flame-retardant underwear and bias repellent. I think it would do you a world of good if you'd try a bit of research diversification so you're not reading the same fake news over and over - maybe take some time off to clear your head...and lay off the Koolaid and laetrile that keeps you hopping - the toxic affects are irreversible. 16:09, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- I think what I and many other editors are patiently awaiting is "the awakening" that will occur in March-April, and will hopefully inspire a major clean-up. We're already seeing the beginning stages with the firing of Andrew McCabe on Friday. More corruption is coming to light as IG Horowitz uncovers rather damning evidence of bias and bad actors in the FBI, including concerns about the FISA court and the judge who recused himself after the Flynn case...the Strzock-Page fiasco...Bruce & Nellie Ohr's connection to Fusion GPS...the leaks by Comey...and so much more. Time will tell...and once again we will be reminded why editors should pay closer attention to RECENTISM and strict adherence to NPOV...a policy that
- No I completely agree with Mongo, the hostility on anything even remotely connected to the current USA administration is appalling. Prince of Thieves (talk) 04:03, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- Noop. SPECIFICO talk 03:56, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Really! Listen in...an AP report just hit the "wires". 20:32, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- I understand, of course, that you are making a friendly joke, but the "mainstream media" thing really does bother me. I'm happy to agree that editorial or opinion pieces should not be cited as facts, even when in mainstream outlets, but mainstream news reports? Those are WP:RS, and we give the mainstream WP:DUE. The phrase "mainstream media" is often used by right-wing fringe sources to self-justify and to attempt to discredit factual information that they find inconvenient. I really do not like to see the phrase used pejoratively in content discussions here. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:42, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- Tryp, I'm not referring to the reporting of factual news, like Florida_International_University_pedestrian_bridge_collapse...I'm referring to political pundits and POV journalists. Anonymous sources...unidentified informants...deep seated hatred for a political opponent...the self-serving political establishment fighting for its life...corruption, gossip, disinformation...shucks, our own policies warn us about issues with news sources. Grab a beverage, find a comfy chair, and read what some of the news sources have written about themselves...Politico, Patrick Maines, Tom Basile, Assange, Gallup, Matthew Ingram (almost a mirror image of what I've tried to relay about the baitclick challenges), The Guardian, Prof. Piers Robinson, BBC...and on and on. You can't make this stuff up. While I may indulge in on my TP, I have occasionally tried to explain some of the more important issues when the opportunity presents itself. Sensationalism is alive and well in MSM, as is propaganda and media bias and no, I'm not joking.
- My former career as a CNN field producer affords me a tiny bit of inside perspective. In fact, my last job was field producer for CNN Headline News (Health & Environmental Unit) back when George D. Lundberg, former editor of AMA's flagship journal, was in the hot seat for publishing a politically charged article about whether or not oral sex was the same as "having" sex. Thank you, Bill Clinton. (I voted for him!) It was a real eye opener. I was old school journalism (integrity, neutrality, yada yada). I was thinking healthy sex while my producer was thinking politics. She had already shaped the story with her line of questioning and people we'd be interviewing - all 100% supportive of Clinton...Lundberg was just a prop. Thank goodness the AMA stood their ground, and didn't let the news or politics influence their decision. The integrity of the AMA was first and foremost - Lundberg was fired. Fun times, lemme tell ya. There were a few other times when I was exposed to high profile political situations, a few I was not expecting. It didn't take long for me to figure out what was going on, and I didn't like it, so I changed direction. In retrospect, I was on the cusp of a paradigm shift in news reporting. In fact 2 years earlier, I had written a craft improvement article for the June '97 issue of Outdoors Unlimited, the flagship magazine of the OWAA. The article was titled "A Tapeless Future" - (excerpt) As we approach a tapeless future, are we also approaching a paperless future? It is worth pondering. We already are seeing magazines and newspapers betroth the web, making increased usage of the Internet imminent as more computers are integrated into consumer households. (yada yada) Here we are today - the transition is almost complete - and my, oh my, how things have changed. Tryp, you can't blame either right or left-wing fringe...they are all after the same $$$...it's about survival in a highly competitive arena. I'm not saying they're all corrupt, but the majority are tinged, even if it's just a sensationalized headline, or a bit of fudging about the facts - all inject their own POV. They are more relaxed about making mistakes because it's easy to publish a retraction now that everything is digital. That's another reason WP editors should exercise good editorial judgment when dealing with politically charged news.
- I commend all the authors of our WP:PAGs for having the foresight to have written NOTNEWS, NEWSORG and RECENTISM, to name a few. They still fit today. I think the biggest problem is misinterpretation of policy, and the occasional disregard for NOTNEWS and RECENTISM. Wasn't it EEng who tried to get something going on his TP along that same line? Well, we can only do what consensus says we can do, and try to avoid causing our admins unnecessary nail biting. In the interim, we wait patiently for all the breaking news, conspiracy theories and unfounded allegations to subside - hopefully before we need yottabytes of storage for just the Trump-related articles. We just need time for the historians and academics to author the RS we need to create and maintain quality encyclopedic material. I do wish WikiTribune would take-off so the bulk of the news articles will migrate over there, but I'm not too optimistic. We're probably going to be stuck with encyclopedic content like Donald_Trump_in_popular_culture#Hair, and List of things named after Donald Trump for a while. 02:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for that comprehensive reply, all of which I read with great interest. I've got no quarrel with anything you said there. I myself have occasionally referred to the "Higher Education Industry" in a sarcastic but I'm-entitled-because-I've-been-there sort of way – but nobody at Misplaced Pages is getting agitated about how we cover money and universities (at least not yet!). On the other hand, it's obvious that political recentism is a minefield here, and I want to advise you against careless use of phrases like "mainstream media", because other editors will construe that as POV pushing. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:06, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- ...hoping I'll never be too crusty or crabby to learn. 20:17, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Good! Soft-shell and soft-sell can never be a bad choice. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:19, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Ha! Tempted to insert a seafood joke here... Prince of Thieves (talk) 20:29, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Read the edit view banner, Prince of Thieves...while temptation knocks, opportunity more often rings the bell. 🛎 Ring away...anything is possible! 20:52, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Maybe a Crabb massacre followed by a banquet attended by foreign dignitaries such as President for life Putin and President for life Xi, all food provided free by Homeless Joe? -- Prince of Thieves (talk) 21:10, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Odd...but the image of the pie crust crab made me think of an article in Fortune for some bizarre reason I simply cannot explain. 21:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Could be this or this. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:32, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- All bow down to the king of the pagan hermit crabs, lest you receive the wrath of the crab gods, or worse, the Attack of the Crab Monsters! -- Prince of Thieves (talk) 21:49, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Good 'un! 22:04, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- All bow down to the king of the pagan hermit crabs, lest you receive the wrath of the crab gods, or worse, the Attack of the Crab Monsters! -- Prince of Thieves (talk) 21:49, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Could be this or this. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:32, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Odd...but the image of the pie crust crab made me think of an article in Fortune for some bizarre reason I simply cannot explain. 21:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Maybe a Crabb massacre followed by a banquet attended by foreign dignitaries such as President for life Putin and President for life Xi, all food provided free by Homeless Joe? -- Prince of Thieves (talk) 21:10, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Read the edit view banner, Prince of Thieves...while temptation knocks, opportunity more often rings the bell. 🛎 Ring away...anything is possible! 20:52, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Ha! Tempted to insert a seafood joke here... Prince of Thieves (talk) 20:29, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Good! Soft-shell and soft-sell can never be a bad choice. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:19, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- ...hoping I'll never be too crusty or crabby to learn. 20:17, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for that comprehensive reply, all of which I read with great interest. I've got no quarrel with anything you said there. I myself have occasionally referred to the "Higher Education Industry" in a sarcastic but I'm-entitled-because-I've-been-there sort of way – but nobody at Misplaced Pages is getting agitated about how we cover money and universities (at least not yet!). On the other hand, it's obvious that political recentism is a minefield here, and I want to advise you against careless use of phrases like "mainstream media", because other editors will construe that as POV pushing. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:06, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
BBC news (Not American, less likely to be biased perhaps)
FBI ex-deputy director Andrew McCabe sacked days before retirement
Former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe has been sacked days before he could retire with pension rights. He was fired by US Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who said an internal review found he leaked information and misled investigators.
I think it is strongly implied that this was because he "leaked information and misled investigators", although this is something McCabe denies. Prince of Thieves (talk) 19:33, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I’d like to hear Atsme’s answer. MastCell 20:04, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- Think that will just highlight natural differences in view points and will thus, be both non productive nor enlightening to understanding the current situation. --Aspro (talk) 22:24, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- MastCell I didn't record it so I hope you're ok with reading it instead of hearing it. ⬆
- Feel compelled to encourage people to take their focus off 'individual' movers-and-shakers and their hiring and firing. Take a step back and look at the bigger picture. You will then find you can see through the scales of misinformation which constantly pumped out to keep the Hoi polloi in the dark. Forget about the 'individual' named Andrew McCabe. If the post had been held by someone else he would have probably been fired as well. We are in the part of the Kondratiev wave were we have World political instability once more. This diagram shows how political instability and wars occur around the peaks and troughs . There are going to be more even more hiring and firing, as politicians strive face up to each other with more 'yes men' behind them. Some might think this is a load of piffle but I have history on my side right back to the ancient Egyptian empire - human nature hasn't changed. --Aspro (talk) 22:27, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oh my, Aspro. I didn't realize you were that old... 22:31, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- My birth certificate is written in medieval Latin and my Social Security Number is written in Roman numerals. Also, my grandchildren are convinced I am an old fossil because I don't have a Facebook page. You can't get older than that ! ;¬ ) --Aspro (talk) 12:19, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Aspro, you win that argument, but I'm close. The part I like most on the linked page begins...
"When he realized that Atsme had been right..."
19:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- Aspro, you win that argument, but I'm close. The part I like most on the linked page begins...
- My birth certificate is written in medieval Latin and my Social Security Number is written in Roman numerals. Also, my grandchildren are convinced I am an old fossil because I don't have a Facebook page. You can't get older than that ! ;¬ ) --Aspro (talk) 12:19, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
- It's certainly quite ironic, or maybe just a demonstration that neither of us is a POV-pusher, that we have each taken the positions that we have about the April 1 DYK. One might have expected the exact opposite! --Tryptofish (talk) 18:13, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Agreed - there's obviously something wrong with us...is being a pragmatist the worst?...maybe we're humorists?...there has to be an "ist" that f-ists us. Lorty...what would the opposition do if they can't call us something? Think about it...we definitely need an "ist" that will fit into a user box. Let's see...
I have 2 doctorates:
Dr. | This user is a Doctor of Acnestis. (Scratch my back, I'll scratch yours.) |
PffT | This user is a Doctor of Everything. (All their work has been doctored.) |
Maybe MjolnirPants can help with an "ist" template...💭🗯...would you like to be known as a neutralist (even though nudist is more fun but not very practicalist)? How about "don't give a shitist"...nope, wrong caliber We don't dare say we're neutral because that's a sure giveaway that we're not. , 💭🗯...so how about...uhm...whatever works bestist...nope, terrible...definitely need your help...ooooh...does that make me a needyist, or a collaboratist or a definitivist? I would settle for ooohist, but wouldn't that make me a wouldist? Right now, I'm a confusist 21:05, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
- I'm an editor-ist. But you can call me "hey you". --Tryptofish (talk) 22:28, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
- Shouldn't that be Dr. Hey You? 04:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Autopatrol Right granted - Thank you
Atsme. I recently came up to 25 articles created. I requested the autopatrol right this morning. Alex Shih approved it and said, "From a quick look, I think most of your creations are well written, and also receives attention from other experienced editors regularly (GA works like Charmayne James alone is suffi cient in my opinion)." So thank you big time for doing a majority of the leg work in Charmayne James with me! A big hug sent your way! dawnleelynn 18:32, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
- Awww...thank you, dawnleelyn!! You certainly deserve autopatrol. Good on ya!! 18:42, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Trump talk
You’re actually still calling attention to that juvenile poo-poo joke? That’s up to you; if it was me I would be hoping people would forget about it. OK, I see that Bish did reference BLP and she did remove it. However, I did not call it a BLP violation and I did not remove it. I said I had been kind of offended by it because I thought it was an ethnic slur, but I left it alone. I did caution you not to make fun of people’s names, that’s true. And yes, “blowhard” was making fun of someone’s name, although not in an ethnic way. IMO this was not out of line for a talk page and was in no way a BLP violation. On talk pages it’s not uncommon for people to describe subjects and sources in less-than-complimentary term. In fact, after you made a federal case out of it, the other editor doubled down and expanded on his criticism of the person. Anyhow, yes, I do think it is trivializing BLP to try to apply it to something like that. BLP is about serious accusations, things that can actually harm a person or their reputation. It’s not about passing low-grade insults. --MelanieN (talk) 19:19, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
- Unless it's me doing it. *sigh* Double standard - it's pretty obvious. Sweeping it under the rug won't change it...but I still luvs ya!! 20:04, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
- One is making fun of a name in a juvenile way. The other is voicing an opinion about an individual using their name as a vehicle for the opinion, said opinion being relevant to the discussion at hand. They are anything but equivalent and your
Unless it's me doing it. *sigh* Double standard - it's pretty obvious.
is itself sigh-inducing. ―Mandruss ☎ 22:41, 21 March 2018 (UTC)- Make like a tree and leave, Mandruss.
- 22:57, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
- I thought it was make like a tree and get out of here? PackMecEng (talk) 13:19, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- Make like a tree and leave, Mandruss.
- One is making fun of a name in a juvenile way. The other is voicing an opinion about an individual using their name as a vehicle for the opinion, said opinion being relevant to the discussion at hand. They are anything but equivalent and your
22:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Why pay for adult channels....
when you can watch Anderson Cooper interviews with Stormy Daniels for free? 02:09, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
- Did she say how big his hands are? --Tryptofish (talk) 22:29, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
.
- I didn't watch the full interview, but I heard she gave him a big hand 👏👏👏👏. 00:10, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oh my, Tryp...someone just informed me that I misunderstood what I heard, and that a big dick with small hands was not meant to garner applause. 13:12, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- Or a hand job. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:36, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, Dr. Hey You. 22:57, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- In Ghostbusters, Bill Murray memorably said: "Back off, man. I'm a scientist." --Tryptofish (talk) 21:02, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- At 5:24 into the program Sturgeon: Ancient Survivors of the Deep, Bill Murray memorably said to a large group of international scientists/ichthyologists: "I know that some of you, in your fractured English, are saying 'What he doing here?'...I am saying what I doing here?" Remind me to tell you that story over a 🍺 or two at the next Wikimania we both happen to attend. 😂 21:49, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- In Ghostbusters, Bill Murray memorably said: "Back off, man. I'm a scientist." --Tryptofish (talk) 21:02, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- you asked: why pay for adult film channels. (Which interestingly has the acronym AFC)... do you really want to miss out on the upcoming Trump Kim menagerie?! I’m pretty sure it’s going to be pay per view. Edaham (talk) 00:58, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- FYI if you think the Stormy Daniels jokes were funny but the Trump/Kim ones aren’t, it means you’re body shaming me. Edaham (talk) 00:59, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- probably they’ll have Stormy along for some Bi-partisan action!!! woaaaah! I did it! Edaham (talk) 01:02, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, Dr. Hey You. 22:57, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- Or a hand job. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:36, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oh my, Tryp...someone just informed me that I misunderstood what I heard, and that a big dick with small hands was not meant to garner applause. 13:12, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- I didn't watch the full interview, but I heard she gave him a big hand 👏👏👏👏. 00:10, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Input sought
Hi Atsme. Regarding your comment at talk:Donald Trump, do you have any thoughts on a better title than List of senior Trump administration people who quit or were fired for that list article? You also commented that it would be BORING. Any thoughts on how to spice it up? Perhaps a screen cap of Trump doing his signature hand gesture when he says "you're fired"? - MrX 🖋 13:56, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- Clever photo idea, MrX...provided we have such a photo. From what I understand, his hands are so small, a macro lens is required which results in serious motion blur. As for title choices...first thing I did was look for similar articles (prior administrations) for consistency and to see if any included reasons for resigning/firing, but I couldn't find any. Then I went online to see how media labeled staff changes, and found Obama's WH "exodus". I also looked to see if there were any comparisons between administrations, and media didn't let me down: Politifact. During that same search, I came across this HuffPo article, which describes staff upheavals as normal. I consider the normal course of business BORING, but then I'm retired so certain words/phrases/terminology put me to sleep. Perhaps a better term would be not notable. It might be wise to avoid WP:RECENTISM, allow time for him to complete one term to learn the ropes well enough so he can pick his own staff instead of letting others do it for him (as what happened in the beginning), and then consider creating a list of administration staff changes for all administrations, if you think it's notable enough to get through an AfD. 16:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- You slay me Atsme. As it happens, there is already such an article: List of Donald Trump dismissals and resignations and also List of short-tenure Donald Trump political appointments, so I won't be pursuing the creation of yet another Trump article.- MrX 🖋 16:44, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- Well, zippity doo dah then and such great additions to this fine encyclopedia endeavor. I do have a suggestion for a category though Category:Wikipedians that suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome. Even negative obsessions could be seen to be a form of flattery though...albeit, somewhat sick and deranged, but well, everyone needs a hobby. TDS...another one even better for while this person talks about TDS, he demonstrates he is fully a sufferer, so sad. Every week or two I check out the Youtube videos that show the media pundits before and as the election results unfolded. Its absolutely hilarious to watch them. To see the smugness and arrogance of them smashed is priceless. And all this time the CNN and MSNBC "news" people and other pretenders were pretending to be neutral...cat was out of dah bag that night huh? Neutrality...that was no longer evident when we get pouting faces. Its the pouting that was most evident...the evening started with glee and cheer and as the results came back in, those "neutral" faces on those "neutral" newscasters got longer and longer and more sullen and then, as it was evident Trump would win...shock! Their faces went to shock! Mouths agape...in some cases tears. Such neutrality! And then pouting! Pouting! Waaaaahhhh! Some looked like the devil bit them on the keister! OMG...how could this terrible event have happened!!! It is a nightmare!!! LOL!--MONGO 12:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Oh look, someone transcluded Breitbart's comments section onto Atsme's talk page. Neat trick. - MrX 🖋 13:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Well, zippity doo dah then and such great additions to this fine encyclopedia endeavor. I do have a suggestion for a category though Category:Wikipedians that suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome. Even negative obsessions could be seen to be a form of flattery though...albeit, somewhat sick and deranged, but well, everyone needs a hobby. TDS...another one even better for while this person talks about TDS, he demonstrates he is fully a sufferer, so sad. Every week or two I check out the Youtube videos that show the media pundits before and as the election results unfolded. Its absolutely hilarious to watch them. To see the smugness and arrogance of them smashed is priceless. And all this time the CNN and MSNBC "news" people and other pretenders were pretending to be neutral...cat was out of dah bag that night huh? Neutrality...that was no longer evident when we get pouting faces. Its the pouting that was most evident...the evening started with glee and cheer and as the results came back in, those "neutral" faces on those "neutral" newscasters got longer and longer and more sullen and then, as it was evident Trump would win...shock! Their faces went to shock! Mouths agape...in some cases tears. Such neutrality! And then pouting! Pouting! Waaaaahhhh! Some looked like the devil bit them on the keister! OMG...how could this terrible event have happened!!! It is a nightmare!!! LOL!--MONGO 12:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- You slay me Atsme. As it happens, there is already such an article: List of Donald Trump dismissals and resignations and also List of short-tenure Donald Trump political appointments, so I won't be pursuing the creation of yet another Trump article.- MrX 🖋 16:44, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Seriously, there is quite an interesting dichotomy between partisan views of media's performance, and it is clearly weighted to be anti-Trump. There is little doubt the issues began with the transition from print to online baitclick media, and the mix of journalist opinion with news. The line between an op-ed and a news piece is blurry and forces one to at least look for the "opinion" designation, not that it really matters in today's online news. The public is also having to deal with misleading headlines like "Texas Democrats Surge to Polls, in Show of Anti-Trump Sentiment" - NYTimes! 😂 That's expected news knowing how media pushes an anti-Trump agenda. Factual news without the propaganda would read more like, Texas Democrats Surge to Polls Only To Be Defeated By Republican Turn-Out, and then the article would weigh toward why the Republican vote won. Instead, they published a misleading, sensationalized headline weighted to the left, and added a short paragraph about the win: Yet even as Democrats in the state’s biggest cities came out in large numbers, Republicans still cast more ballots over all thanks to their rural strength.
Once all the hype dies down, WP's Trump-related articles will balance out. Right now, they give weight to the misleading sensationalist aspect of the article - basically the "fringe view" - while labeling the actual facts as fringe because of the way media weighs it. While it's expected of media, it's not ok for an encyclopedia that is supposed to publish a NPOV and get the article right using sound editorial judgement...and therein the problem lies. I came across an interesting article - highly recommended reading because if we delve into the results of TBs & blocks over the past year, we'll probably find a high number of center-right leaning editors on the list - probably all behaviorial issues but a review would be interesting. I've long since learned that Trump supporters are not the poor, ignorant voters some on the left tend to believe, and their growing distrust in media is real and justified in many instances. WP's political articles cite those same questionable, left-leaning sources - the balance is off the charts - so a legitimate question is what will eventually happen to the confidence level of our readers? I recently commented on a Sign-Post article the other day about a questionable article published by SPLC with input from some of our own editors. Surprisingly 😂 the article lump sums right-wing with racist, etc. I was hoping to see more diversity and common sense responses to my comment but that hasn't happened so far. 16:14, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah the current state of the news media in the US is a disaster for a variety of reasons reflective of American society. It's what we have though, and once you strip away the hyperbole, clickbait, and punditry, you're still left with facts. The facts are intrinsically anti-Trump because of who Trump is. He lies almost constantly. He's a demagogue of the highest order who manipulates his base with romantic images of white, post-war, isolationist, blue-collar prosperity. He's astonishingly incompetent in his current role. He has few, if any, leadership qualities. He has badly damaged foreign relations, environmental protections, and consumer protections. He will probably bring the economy to its knees. His suits don't fit, he's cheated on his wives, and he has terrible taste in decor. But yeah, it's the liberal media's fault.- MrX 🖋 17:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC)