User talk:AmeliaMN: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 19:55, 3 June 2018 editBradv (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators37,875 edits Notification: Your Articles for Creation submission has been declined (AFCH 0.9)← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:02, 4 June 2018 edit undoLonehexagon (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers2,938 edits Notification: Your Articles for Creation submission has been declined (AFCH 0.9)Next edit →
Line 212:		Line 212:

	]] 19:55, 3 June 2018 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline-->		]] 19:55, 3 June 2018 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline-->

			== Your submission at ]: ] (June 4) ==
			<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> ]Your recent article submission to ] has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason<!-- pluralize "reason" --><!--empty--> left by Lonehexagon was:

			{{divbox\|gray\|3=This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Misplaced Pages requires ''significant'' coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in ''published'', ], ] sources that are '']'' of the subject—see the ], ] and learn about ] when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing <small>(see ] and ])</small>, so that the information is ], and there is clear evidence of why the subject is ] and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional ''reliable'' sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Misplaced Pages at this time.\|}}<!--
			--
			--> The comment the reviewer left was:

			{{divbox\|blue\|3=Hello, thanks for your submission. Unfortunately, I have to decline the article for now. The main problem with this article is that notability hasn't been established. To demonstrate notability, the article must show the subject has "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." More information about notability requirements here: https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Notability

			I clicked and read through every source, and I wasn't able to find sources that pass the notability requirements.

			Significant coverage: Many of the sources did not mention the subject at all and a few only had passing mentions of her. Those articles do not contribute to notability. What we're trying to establish here is that people are interested enough in the subject to actually cover her in some detail.

			Independent sources: Many of the sources were articles at the New York Times. Unfortunately, those cannot be used to indicate notability since they are not independent of the subject (she works for the New York Times). I also saw a profile page at NYU, which doesn't count as an independent source since she is faculty there.

			Reliable sources: I saw there were a few press releases, sponsored announcements, and blog posts being used as sources. Unfortunately, those cannot be used to establish notability because the reliability and independence of that type of information is not guaranteed.

			The closest example to a good source is this one: https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2012.00605.x The article is about the subject by an independent source, and shows that someone took interest in her. However, much of the information is from what she said during an interview, which is not considered the most reliable source of information. Since it is a relatively weak source, this article still needs more sources and stronger sources before it is ready to be published. Much of the information also needs to be verified. I would suggest starting by removing all sources that don't mention the subject. They cause confusion when trying to read through the citations to validate the information in the article.

			If you have any questions, or would like to discuss this further, please don't hesitate to write on my Talk page :)}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit <u>when they have been resolved</u>.
			{{clear}}
			* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to ] and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
			* If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to ], click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{tl\|db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
			* If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the <span class="plainlinks"></span> or on the <span class="plainlinks"></span>.
			* You can also use ].

			] (]) 01:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline-->

Revision as of 01:02, 4 June 2018

Updates to article on Jenny Bryan

I saw your blog post and made a few edits to the draft for Jenny Bryan to document her notability in more detail. Now it's at least as substantial as the accepted articles on Donna Brogan and Mine Çetinkaya-Rundel, so it should have a better chance of being accepted into the main namespace. Let's see what the reviewers think! Comtebenoit (talk) 15:17, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, Comtebenoit! I don't know enough Wiki-etiquette to know whether I should thank you here or on your talk page, but I do appreciate it. AmeliaMN (talk) 19:51, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

No worries! I'm happy to help. Comtebenoit (talk) 00:48, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Do you think it is worth to resubmit the draft now, or do you have other plans? It would be nice to have it in the main namespace before the unconf. Comtebenoit (talk) 05:17, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

AmeliaMN, you are invited on a Misplaced Pages Adventure!

The [REDACTED] Adventure

Hi AmeliaMN!! You're invited: learn how to edit Misplaced Pages in under an hour. Hope to see you there!

Play The Misplaced Pages Adventure
This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:39, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marie Davidian (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Marie Davidian.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Misplaced Pages!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zach Vega (talk to me) 02:16, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Marie Davidian

Hello AmeliaMN. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Marie Davidian".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Marie Davidian}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 11:00, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donna Brogan has been accepted

Donna Brogan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!

joe decker 16:10, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mine Çetinkaya-Rundel has been accepted

Mine Çetinkaya-Rundel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!

I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 00:15, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janaya Khan has been accepted

Janaya Khan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:29, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to The Misplaced Pages Adventure!

Hi AmeliaMN! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:08, Sunday, February 25, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help
About The Misplaced Pages Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meredith Broussard (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was: This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Misplaced Pages requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for academics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Misplaced Pages:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Misplaced Pages at this time. The comment the reviewer left was: We need to see WP:SECONDARY coverage about the subject, not by the subject. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Meredith Broussard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Meredith Broussard, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 02:36, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

[REDACTED]

Hello, AmeliaMN! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Kvng (talk) 02:36, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlotte Wickham (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was: This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Misplaced Pages requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Misplaced Pages:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Misplaced Pages at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlotte Wickham and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Charlotte Wickham, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 16:39, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Henry Hansen has been accepted

Mark Henry Hansen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!

DGG ( talk ) 07:41, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beatrice Fischel-Bock (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Misplaced Pages requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Misplaced Pages:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Misplaced Pages at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beatrice Fischel-Bock and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Beatrice Fischel-Bock, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 07:44, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kennedy Elliott (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was: This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Misplaced Pages requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Misplaced Pages:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Misplaced Pages at this time. The comment the reviewer left was: Sourcing isn't strong enough and mostly (the online) connected to her. 1 is her college. 2 is an interview with her. 3 is her speech. 4 I don't see her. 6/7/8 are her paper. We need "significant coverage from reliable (they meet this) sources independent of the subject". Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kennedy Elliott and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kennedy Elliott, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 07:00, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kim Rees (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was: This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Misplaced Pages requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Misplaced Pages:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Misplaced Pages at this time. The comment the reviewer left was: There is very little in the way about Rees herself; most of it is about Periscopic and/or her related projects. The other sources tend towards the realm of being PRIMARY, which are both extremely discouraged and also useless for demonstrating notability. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kim Rees and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kim Rees, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 18:03, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sisi Wei (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was: This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Misplaced Pages requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Misplaced Pages:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Misplaced Pages at this time. The comment the reviewer left was: There are a couple of decent sources used for verification purposes (i.e. confirming a fact and little else), but all of the "in-depth" sources are PRIMARY (interviews, mostly), which are strongly discouraged. Her own writings are essentially useless both for verification and for notability (though obviously useful if you're verifying that she wrote about XYZ). Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sisi Wei and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sisi Wei, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 18:09, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jennifer (Jenny) Bryan (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was: This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Misplaced Pages requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for academics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Misplaced Pages:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Misplaced Pages at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jennifer (Jenny) Bryan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jennifer (Jenny) Bryan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brad v 19:55, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amanda Cox (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lonehexagon was: This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Misplaced Pages requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Misplaced Pages:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Misplaced Pages at this time. The comment the reviewer left was: Hello, thanks for your submission. Unfortunately, I have to decline the article for now. The main problem with this article is that notability hasn't been established. To demonstrate notability, the article must show the subject has "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." More information about notability requirements here: https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Notability

I clicked and read through every source, and I wasn't able to find sources that pass the notability requirements.

Significant coverage: Many of the sources did not mention the subject at all and a few only had passing mentions of her. Those articles do not contribute to notability. What we're trying to establish here is that people are interested enough in the subject to actually cover her in some detail.

Independent sources: Many of the sources were articles at the New York Times. Unfortunately, those cannot be used to indicate notability since they are not independent of the subject (she works for the New York Times). I also saw a profile page at NYU, which doesn't count as an independent source since she is faculty there.

Reliable sources: I saw there were a few press releases, sponsored announcements, and blog posts being used as sources. Unfortunately, those cannot be used to establish notability because the reliability and independence of that type of information is not guaranteed.

The closest example to a good source is this one: https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2012.00605.x The article is about the subject by an independent source, and shows that someone took interest in her. However, much of the information is from what she said during an interview, which is not considered the most reliable source of information. Since it is a relatively weak source, this article still needs more sources and stronger sources before it is ready to be published. Much of the information also needs to be verified. I would suggest starting by removing all sources that don't mention the subject. They cause confusion when trying to read through the citations to validate the information in the article.

If you have any questions, or would like to discuss this further, please don't hesitate to write on my Talk page :) Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amanda Cox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Amanda Cox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lonehexagon (talk) 01:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)