Misplaced Pages

Talk:Christopher Street: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:08, 5 April 2016 editYobot (talk | contribs)Bots4,733,870 editsm top: Tagging part 1 per BOTREQ using AWB (11993)← Previous edit Revision as of 01:23, 19 November 2018 edit undoReywas92 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers81,321 edits Images: new sectionTag: 2017 wikitext editorNext edit →
Line 25: Line 25:
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom --> :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->

== Images ==

Per ]: "Each image should be inside the level 2 section to which it relates, within the section defined by the most recent <code>==Heading==</code> delimited by two equal signs, or at the top of the lead section. Do not place images immediately above section headings."

You have provided no reason why this clear statement should be ignored. This is by no means a "common sense exception". Pointing out that is is a guideline not a policy is not a reason to ignore it. ]<sup>]</sup> 01:23, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:23, 19 November 2018

WikiProject iconLGBTQ+ studies Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Misplaced Pages. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconNew York City Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Gay City link

Is the "Gay City" link useful? It seems to be nothing but ads and a listing of bars. - Jmabel | Talk 03:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

That's what Christopher Street is. TRWBW 02:18, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 16:15, 4 December 2011 (UTC)


Christopher Street (Manhattan)Christopher Street

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Images

Per MOS:IM: "Each image should be inside the level 2 section to which it relates, within the section defined by the most recent ==Heading== delimited by two equal signs, or at the top of the lead section. Do not place images immediately above section headings."

You have provided no reason why this clear statement should be ignored. This is by no means a "common sense exception". Pointing out that is is a guideline not a policy is not a reason to ignore it. Reywas92 01:23, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Categories:
Talk:Christopher Street: Difference between revisions Add topic