| Revision as of 00:38, 21 November 2018 editAmorymeltzer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Interface administrators, Oversighters, Administrators63,406 edits Notifying about declined speedy deletion (CSDH)← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:42, 21 November 2018 edit undoJovanmilic97 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users30,804 edits Got it! Removing the matters that are not closed yet!Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == ] == | |||
| Sorry about that, man - for some reason I was sure that this had only be opened today :() Please accept my apologies, and feel free to re-close... --<span style="font-family:Courier">]</span> <small>(] · ])</small> 13:49, 20 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :{{reply to|Elmidae}} It is totally okay, you don't need to be sorry for that as all you did was a good faith editing of Misplaced Pages, nothing else. We are all humans and we make mistakes. Thank you for messaging me here, I appreciate it. Will re-close now. :) | |||
| == your AfD closures == | == your AfD closures == | ||
| Line 22: | Line 17: | ||
| *] I can revert a relist on this one if that is what you feel it is needed. Keep voters proved both good arguments and feel much strong that the delete vote, but I wanted to see if there is a chance for even more clear consensus to happen so that one does not get to Deletion review for premature closure or such. | *] I can revert a relist on this one if that is what you feel it is needed. Keep voters proved both good arguments and feel much strong that the delete vote, but I wanted to see if there is a chance for even more clear consensus to happen so that one does not get to Deletion review for premature closure or such. | ||
| *] Not sure why did you ask me about this, is because this should have been speedy kept because of too many articles nominated for AfD? Looking at voters, !delete vote is just a vote with no further explanation and FOARP's comment needed to be discussed more. ] (]) 23:00, 20 November 2018 (UTC) | *] Not sure why did you ask me about this, is because this should have been speedy kept because of too many articles nominated for AfD? Looking at voters, !delete vote is just a vote with no further explanation and FOARP's comment needed to be discussed more. ] (]) 23:00, 20 November 2018 (UTC) | ||
| == Speedy deletion declined: ] == | |||
| Hello Jovanmilic97. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of ], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''] does not apply to redirects from page moves unless that page was also recently created. Use ] if you want deletion.''' Thank you. ~ <span style="color:#DF00A0">Amory</span><small style="color:#555"> ''(] • ] • ])''</small> 00:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:42, 21 November 2018
your AfD closures
Hi, thanks for helping at AfDs, can you explain in detail how, you decide to NAC close or relist an AfD. I have some concerns related to some of the recent AfDs that you have closed and relisted. --DBigXrayᗙ 22:25, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
@DBigXray: Hi! Can you say which ones you have concerns about so I can revert my closures if needed? I relist when I feel there is no consensus achieved up to that point, or when it is really close from both sides (no I do not count votes in numbers). When I keep, I check if there is a huge proper support to keep the article or there is no agreement with nominator to delete at all. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
@DBigXray: Pinging again just in case, since I got reports some people did not get my pings today Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:34, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Can you elaborate more on your methods for these below AfDs, also do consider reverting if you find it is needed. --DBigXrayᗙ 22:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/2007 British Army order of battle
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ocean of Tears
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Civil flag
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/B.l.o.w.
@DBigXray: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/2007 British Army order of battle I did not think delete !voters supported things around. Per XYZ person is something to avoid in AfD. And apart of that from the relist and over, there was overwhelming support to keep the article (along with nominator showing WP:IDONTLIKEIT signs which is not a valid reason to nominate).
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ocean of Tears easy one. Absolutely no agreement consensus with nominator to delete article, with lots of good arguments to keep, with multiple sources noted.
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Civil flag I can revert a relist on this one if that is what you feel it is needed. Keep voters proved both good arguments and feel much strong that the delete vote, but I wanted to see if there is a chance for even more clear consensus to happen so that one does not get to Deletion review for premature closure or such.
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/B.l.o.w. Not sure why did you ask me about this, is because this should have been speedy kept because of too many articles nominated for AfD? Looking at voters, !delete vote is just a vote with no further explanation and FOARP's comment needed to be discussed more. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:00, 20 November 2018 (UTC)