| Revision as of 00:36, 5 December 2018 editNewshunter12 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,781 edits Delete.← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:00, 6 December 2018 edit undoCommanderLinx (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,037 edits DeleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:19, 4 December 2018 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:19, 4 December 2018 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Delete''' This poorly sourced article fails ], ], and ]. There is no policy that the being old is notable and this article is packed with longevity fancruft like her village's change in status, she was one of the first workers at a local sawmill, and didn't remember WWI (how surprising) but did WWII. This ] is not needed. ] (]) 00:36, 5 December 2018 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' This poorly sourced article fails ], ], and ]. There is no policy that the being old is notable and this article is packed with longevity fancruft like her village's change in status, she was one of the first workers at a local sawmill, and didn't remember WWI (how surprising) but did WWII. This ] is not needed. ] (]) 00:36, 5 December 2018 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Fails ]. One ] obituary does not make someone notable. Even then, this is a ] that never will be expanded beyond "born, worked at a sawmill, got married and had two kids, lived to age X, died". No suitable redirect either. ] (]) 12:00, 6 December 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:00, 6 December 2018
Benedykta Mackieło
AfDs for this article:New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Benedykta Mackieło (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a purported supercentenarian which tells us almost nothing about her. Almost no sources, and those which do exist are of laughably routine events (as this article actually points out itself). WP:NOPAGE here. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:13, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 19:18, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 19:18, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 19:19, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete This poorly sourced article fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO1E, and WP:NOPAGE. There is no policy that the being old is notable and this article is packed with longevity fancruft like her village's change in status, she was one of the first workers at a local sawmill, and didn't remember WWI (how surprising) but did WWII. This WP:PERMASTUB is not needed. Newshunter12 (talk) 00:36, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG. One WP:ROUTINE obituary does not make someone notable. Even then, this is a WP:PERMASTUB that never will be expanded beyond "born, worked at a sawmill, got married and had two kids, lived to age X, died". No suitable redirect either. CommanderLinx (talk) 12:00, 6 December 2018 (UTC)