| Revision as of 03:58, 13 December 2018 editWakari07 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,825 edits →Meng blurb: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:12, 13 December 2018 edit undoTobby72 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users37,876 edits commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| :::::This make no sense. The informative value is in link (detention of meng wanzhou) and main article (meng wanzhou) the link is related to. i repeat again we do NOT need every news item to mention background info the case is ONGOING. ] (]) 20:48, 12 December 2018 (UTC) | :::::This make no sense. The informative value is in link (detention of meng wanzhou) and main article (meng wanzhou) the link is related to. i repeat again we do NOT need every news item to mention background info the case is ONGOING. ] (]) 20:48, 12 December 2018 (UTC) | ||
| ::::::<nowiki>#Detention</nowiki> is a section of the Meng Wanzhou article: I'm trying to explain that that is not informative. ] (]) 03:58, 13 December 2018 (UTC) | ::::::<nowiki>#Detention</nowiki> is a section of the Meng Wanzhou article: I'm trying to explain that that is not informative. ] (]) 03:58, 13 December 2018 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::I agree with ]. -- ] (]) 10:12, 13 December 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:12, 13 December 2018
Meng blurb
people will be wonder why canadian judge is involve if you just say us prosecutors is trying her
and corrected Meng story: source writes, "awaits possible extradition to the United States on fraud charges" and "The U.S. has accused Meng of repeatedly lying to financial institutions about the relationship between Huawei and a company called Skycom, which it says did business in Iran in violation of international sanctions."
The Canadian judge is involved in the arrest and possible extradition. Source says "Gibb-Carsley, acting for the U.S." See also the unresolved 7 December talk page where a third opinion is pending. Wakari07 (talk) 08:37, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
- i have removed the background info wholy. the case is ongoing we do not need background info for EVERY news item that mention her. prevent further edit war and redundndayc Waskerton (talk) 08:45, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
- I have remove the news item in wholle till an agreement can be found here. Here is my preferred wording:
Detention of Meng WanzhouMeng Wanzhou is granted bail with restrictions by a Canadian judge. (CBC)Waskerton (talk) 08:55, 12 December 2018 (UTC)- Since there is no link to a category or container article, the informative value of the blurb is more complete with a concise explanation to the reader of who Meng is and what the case is about. Wakari07 (talk) 11:15, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
- This make no sense. The informative value is in link (detention of meng wanzhou) and main article (meng wanzhou) the link is related to. i repeat again we do NOT need every news item to mention background info the case is ONGOING. Waskerton (talk) 20:48, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
- #Detention is a section of the Meng Wanzhou article: I'm trying to explain that that is not informative. Wakari07 (talk) 03:58, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- I agree with Wakari07. -- Tobby72 (talk) 10:12, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- #Detention is a section of the Meng Wanzhou article: I'm trying to explain that that is not informative. Wakari07 (talk) 03:58, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- This make no sense. The informative value is in link (detention of meng wanzhou) and main article (meng wanzhou) the link is related to. i repeat again we do NOT need every news item to mention background info the case is ONGOING. Waskerton (talk) 20:48, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
- Since there is no link to a category or container article, the informative value of the blurb is more complete with a concise explanation to the reader of who Meng is and what the case is about. Wakari07 (talk) 11:15, 12 December 2018 (UTC)