| Revision as of 09:55, 6 June 2019 editGerda Arendt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers383,061 edits →Cornflowers: offer link← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:49, 14 June 2019 edit undoDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators407,595 edits →Warm wishesNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| *I guess I missed all this. I'm reminded of ], #2. You've accomplished more than your fair share. Hope you come back in a while; understand if you don't. --] (]) 23:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC) | *I guess I missed all this. I'm reminded of ], #2. You've accomplished more than your fair share. Hope you come back in a while; understand if you don't. --] (]) 23:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
| *Take care Malik. I am truly sorry for what you had thrown at you in this place. ] (]) 04:49, 14 June 2019 (UTC) | |||
| {{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Moment magazine cover March-April 2016.jpg== | ==Orphaned non-free image File:Moment magazine cover March-April 2016.jpg== | ||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | ||
Revision as of 04:49, 14 June 2019
Cornflowers
 | |
| Cornflowers |
|---|
miss you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:53, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Warm wishes
I understand your desire to step away from a while, but I hope that you will return when the time is right for you. Thank you for all of your excellent contributions over the years. Cullen Let's discuss it 22:00, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Absolutely. Malik should never have been de-sysopped in the first place. Admins working in the I-P area need a thick skin and a quick brain – and Malik was one of the best. Malik, I hope you'll come back again some day. Best wishes, NSH001 (talk) 06:57, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Don't know what to say really, except to pitifully echo the warm thoughts expressed by others. Best wishes whatever you decide to do eventually. Pincrete (talk) 13:27, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Since a simple apology for the original sin against him won't be forthcoming, and that would, I hazard, be the only persuasive thing that might make him reconsider, the only helpful thing here would be a collective effort to write an historical essay summarizing as stringently and neutrally as possible how this punitive domino effect began, with a sockpuppet's harassment. And once sandboxed out, leave it on this abandoned page just to set the record straight, vindicate our lost editor's honour, and enable those who wonder what it was all about catch the drift in an overview. MS certainly deserves such a pittance of commemorative justice, and as a practice I don't see why it wouldn't turn out set a useful precedent for writing up cases in wikispace where bad administrative judgment can be shown to have catastrophic effects. It might teach that body to listen to the community, rather than rule it. Nishidani (talk) 15:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- That's an intriguing idea. Shearonink (talk) 15:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Since a simple apology for the original sin against him won't be forthcoming, and that would, I hazard, be the only persuasive thing that might make him reconsider, the only helpful thing here would be a collective effort to write an historical essay summarizing as stringently and neutrally as possible how this punitive domino effect began, with a sockpuppet's harassment. And once sandboxed out, leave it on this abandoned page just to set the record straight, vindicate our lost editor's honour, and enable those who wonder what it was all about catch the drift in an overview. MS certainly deserves such a pittance of commemorative justice, and as a practice I don't see why it wouldn't turn out set a useful precedent for writing up cases in wikispace where bad administrative judgment can be shown to have catastrophic effects. It might teach that body to listen to the community, rather than rule it. Nishidani (talk) 15:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Don't know what to say really, except to pitifully echo the warm thoughts expressed by others. Best wishes whatever you decide to do eventually. Pincrete (talk) 13:27, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 | |
| ... that a church's 1510 spiral of justice declares: "Justice suffered in great need. Truth is slain dead. Faith has lost the battle"? |
- Agree. As I can't help with that, just another image. This was actually on our Main page. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:11, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- I guess I missed all this. I'm reminded of User:MastCell#The Cynic's Guide to Misplaced Pages, #2. You've accomplished more than your fair share. Hope you come back in a while; understand if you don't. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Take care Malik. I am truly sorry for what you had thrown at you in this place. Drmies (talk) 04:49, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Moment magazine cover March-April 2016.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Moment magazine cover March-April 2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- It is used now. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:42, 6 June 2019 (UTC)