| Revision as of 14:22, 14 July 2019 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,590,663 editsm Substing templates: {{Unsigned}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:01, 14 July 2019 edit undoCommanderLinx (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,037 edits →Maria Giuseppa Robucci: delete/redirectNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| {{reflist-talk}} | {{reflist-talk}} | ||
| *'''Delete''' or '''Redirect''' to appropriate list per ] and ]. Sources are routine birthday articles and don't tell us much more than the usual longevity nothingness of born, got married, had kids, got old, died. Entry on a list is enough. ] (]) 19:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:01, 14 July 2019
Maria Giuseppa Robucci
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Maria Giuseppa Robucci (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article and sources do not assert notability beyond reaching an advanced age: she was born, had children, got very old, chopped wood, broke a hip, and died. This lady's placement in our List of Italian supercentenarians is sufficient (with a redirect on her name). — JFG 23:21, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - sustained significant coverage over the course of 15+ years. It doesn't matter why she's notable, just that she is notable. Once she is deemed to be notable, then a basic biography of her life is warranted, and there's more than enough info for a stand-alone biography. schetm (talk) 01:56, 12 July 2019(UTC)
- She did NOT have "15 years" of WP:SIGCOV. There was one short feature for her 100th birthday, as is extremely common, and over 10 years later she got some WP:ROUTINE oldster coverage over a few years. There is nothing notable about her that doesn't fit snuggly in a list entry. Newshunter12 (talk) 03:03, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NOPAGE and WP:GNG. Only received routine oldster feature coverage. Just the typical fluff born, married, had kids, longevity secret, random undefined factoid chopped wood until a certain age, died. Her list entry at List of Italian supercentenarians and elsewhere is enough. Newshunter12 (talk) 03:03, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CThomas (talk) 04:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CThomas (talk) 04:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CThomas (talk) 04:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - There's a lot of room for interpretation of WP:NOPAGE and WP:ROUTINE. Even though it is common for subjects like this to receive coverage on their 100th birthday, reaching 100 is extraordinary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kvng (talk • contribs)
References
- Delete or Redirect to appropriate list per WP:NOPAGE and WP:PERMASTUB. Sources are routine birthday articles and don't tell us much more than the usual longevity nothingness of born, got married, had kids, got old, died. Entry on a list is enough. CommanderLinx (talk) 19:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)