| Revision as of 07:45, 17 July 2019 view sourceOnceinawhile (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers49,730 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:47, 17 July 2019 view source Onceinawhile (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers49,730 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{pp-move|small=yes}}{{pp-semi-indef}} | {{pp-move|small=yes}}{{pp-semi-indef}} | ||
| {{shortcut|WP:Legality of Israeli settlements}} | |||
| == Settlement illegality text == | == Settlement illegality text == | ||
Revision as of 07:47, 17 July 2019
Shortcut
Settlement illegality text
Through a long process on the talk page, the following text has established consensus:
- The international community considers Israeli settlements in (the Golan Heights/the West Bank/East Jerusalem) illegal under international law, but the Israeli government disputes this.
Guidance and further discussion
- Guidance on use from the original discussion at the talk page:
- From LHvU: "there is agreement of the use of the wording in articles both of multi section length, and single section/stub standard"
- According to LHvU's clarification: "I found that there was consensus for the wording per proposal 2, and for it to be included in the opening paragraph(s) of multi section articles, where it may be expanded per WP:LEDE in the article body, and to be used without further expansion in stub or very short articles."
- According to LHvU at Arbitration enforcement: "Only in some articles, those which had a brief introduction and then a body of one or two sections, was there disagreement on how it was to be incorporated - but not if.
- From T. Canens at Arbitration Enforcement: "As the objection has been made clear, I expect Nableezy to either conform their future edits to the consensus wording as determined by LHvU, or obtain consensus for their new version."
Notes
- added by Carwil, who drafted these notes