Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:01, 10 November 2019

Poland C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland C This article has been rated as C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany C This article has been rated as C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article content

IMO, the content for this article does not seem well organized and should be spread over different articles. A good division to me would be: Lubus Land- history under Polish control (-1252, 1945-), Neumark (Region)/East Brandenburg- history under German control (1252-1945), Bishopric of Lebus- history of the bishopric. Anyone have any thoughts? Olessi 19:24, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

--

Sounds good. IMO, keep Lubus Land and Neumark (region) separate because these regions coexisted in different areas at the same time. Ditch East Brandenburg and merge it into Neumark with a redirect and mention in the first line. Also keep Bishopric of Lebus info with Lubus Land.

Look here for a map showing both regions: http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/historical/shepherd/brandenburg_1320_1415.jpg

Look here for a map with the Bishopric outlined in faint dotted line: http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/historical/shepherd/central_europe_1477.jpg

Maybe mention should be made of Neumark along with Lubus Land in the Lubuskie Voivodship article.

I also wonder if this article (Lubus Land) shouldn't be renamed to Lebus Land. I'm not sure where this form came from -- it's not German (Lebus) or Polish (Lubusz). Lebus Land is usually the term in the few English references out there (incl. maps above) and the town (Lebus) for which it is named is still in Germany.

LuiKhuntek 20:48, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

I would say that most of the information in "Lubusz Land" would be better at "Bishopric of Lebus". The diocese is referred to more often in English than the Lubusz Land. I am in the process of translating the German article of Neumark and should be posting that in a day or two. Olessi 17:09, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Name

"Lubusz Land" doesn't sound English at all. Are there good cites for its use? It sounds like a direct, inept, Polish calque.Malick78 (talk) 22:34, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

How about you actually bother to check around before expressing an opinion? Who cares what it "sounds like"? Misplaced Pages is not based on what stuff "sounds like" to any ol' editor that just doesn't like the "sound" of something, but on sources. Do the work/research first, then comment.VolunteerMarek 22:38, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

How to deal with Poles. 92.225.162.7 (talk) 12:20, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

• C-Class Poland articles
• Low-importance Poland articles
• WikiProject Poland articles
• C-Class Germany articles
• Low-importance Germany articles
• WikiProject Germany articles