User talk:Jtbobwaysf: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:29, 19 October 2019 editMediaWiki message delivery (talk \| contribs)Bots3,142,123 edits →2019 US Banknote Contest: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:24, 12 November 2019 edit undoThenightaway (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users52,121 edits →Edit-warring on Julian Assange: new sectionNext edit →
Line 51:		Line 51:
	<span style="font-size:85%;">Sent by ] at 23:29, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via ] (])</span>		<span style="font-size:85%;">Sent by ] at 23:29, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via ] (])</span>
	<!-- Message sent by User:ZLEA@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:US_Banknote_Contest/2019/invite_list&oldid=922099028 -->		<!-- Message sent by User:ZLEA@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:US_Banknote_Contest/2019/invite_list&oldid=922099028 -->

			== Edit-warring on ] ==

			] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].

			'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->. ] (]) 02:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

			: Furthermore, the Assange page is covered by discretionary sanctions. ] (]) 02:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
			: The content that you are edit-warring into the lede is opposed by several editors on the talk page, and there is clearly no consensus for adding it to the lede. ] (]) 02:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:24, 12 November 2019

This is Jtbobwaysf's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thank you so much for notifying for Kanika Batra article. I like your comment. Thanks for being transparent and reasonable. DAR (talk) 22:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Uma medalha para você!

	A Medalha Surreal
	Thanks for Cryptocurrency bubble article. FML 06:00, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank you Rebecca jones (talk) 22:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you Rebecca jones Sincerely, Jtbobwaysf (talk) 23:01, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest

[REDACTED]	US Banknote Contest
November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

[REDACTED]

US Banknote Contest

November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.

If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:29, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

Edit-warring on Julian Assange

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 02:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Furthermore, the Assange page is covered by discretionary sanctions. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 02:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

The content that you are edit-warring into the lede is opposed by several editors on the talk page, and there is clearly no consensus for adding it to the lede. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 02:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)