| Revision as of 12:28, 8 December 2006 editMbelisle (talk | contribs)168 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:31, 8 December 2006 edit undoMbelisle (talk | contribs)168 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| ==Note== | ==Note== | ||
| If anyone has any ] to bring to light on this issue, please do so, this page is now sprotected. Open discussion is not a bad thing (it's a good thing), just try to avoid making this into a revert war page (that doesn't work) -- ] 21:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC) | If anyone has any ] to bring to light on this issue, please do so, this page is now sprotected. Open discussion is not a bad thing (it's a good thing), just try to avoid making this into a revert war page (that doesn't work) -- ] 21:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :The fact that the GNAA page has been the topic of so much divisive discussion within Misplaced Pages circles—including a comment on the topic by Wales—is in and of itself notable and verifiable. ] 12:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC) | :The fact that the GNAA page has been the topic of so much divisive discussion within Misplaced Pages circles—including a comment on the topic by Wales—is in and of itself notable and verifiable. Perhaps we need a article titled, ”2006_Deletion_of_GNAA_Article” ] 12:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:31, 8 December 2006
Note
If anyone has any reliable sources to bring to light on this issue, please do so, this page is now sprotected. Open discussion is not a bad thing (it's a good thing), just try to avoid making this into a revert war page (that doesn't work) -- Tawker 21:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- The fact that the GNAA page has been the topic of so much divisive discussion within Misplaced Pages circles—including a comment on the topic by Wales—is in and of itself notable and verifiable. Perhaps we need a article titled, ”2006_Deletion_of_GNAA_Article” Mbelisle 12:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)