Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 18:16, 11 December 2019

I do tend to delete messages when they are no longer relevant, so don't take offence if/when your message goes the way of the dodo

Atom

The Atom is not street legal in many countries -->Typ932 14:19, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Neither is the Skyline R34 GT-R, Porsche 959 or Mclaren F1. Don't they count either?--Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 15:02, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Are you sure? which countries? also they dont beat Ferrari in NA engines and has nothing to do with this case -->Typ932 17:28, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

In the States - and while they are irrelevant to the highest NA engine issue, it is relevant that they are considered production cars, despite not being road legal in certain countries. --Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 06:37, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Dont mix production and street legal cars, those are still "cars" not some kit track boxes on wheels, Ill bet some countries could have Formula1 car as street legal, we need to see larger picture, and those are most probably street legal in many more countries than Atom or Caparo, USA is also large exemption for European cars, they have such strick laws for import cars -->Typ932 07:05, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

The Atom is mosty likely street legal car as many country as McLaren isnt -->Typ932 07:09, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Car collection.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:59, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Jules Bianchi

You just literally revert-warred unsourced, unsigned anon speculation about the condition of a living person into an article talk page. I'm stunned speechless. You must know how inappropriate this is — Misplaced Pages talk pages are not forums for discussion or speculation about anything, much less whether someone's alive or dead. Please don't do it again. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 08:59, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

wikipedia policy allows for speculation on talk pages. Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 09:27, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

You are reverting to a vandalised version saying that Bianchi has died. Stop immediately or I will report you to an admin. Bretonbanquet (talk) 09:28, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

It is speculation, no one knows if he is dead on not. Would you like a link to the meaning of the word speculation? Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 09:30, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

What is the matter with you? You want to keep someone's idiotic vandal edit saying Bianchi has died, with no basis in fact whatsoever? Keep it up, I will report you. Bretonbanquet (talk) 09:31, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Did you see the crash? Did you see what he hit? Unfortunately, there is a reasonable chance that he did actually die. It is valid speculation, not vandalism. Don't spam my talk page again. Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 09:33, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I saw the accident, or as much as US television showed. I also used to work in professional motor racing, and I've had to write press releases for serious crashes and driver injuries. For fuck's sake, have some respect for Jules, his team and the F1 community; if you want to run around speculating about someone who may well be fighting for their life right now, Reddit and 4chan are thataway. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 09:42, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Don't ever swear on my page again, or you will have all your comments removed. I didn't speculate anything, I merely supported another wikipedian's right to do so. Take a look at who made which edit, before you accuse me of anything. If the speculation had been made on the article page, I would have removed it. Talk pages are the correct place for speculation. Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 09:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Speaking as someone who's seen the various post-crash photos posted to Twitter, Facebook, and reliable media sources, I'm going to say that there's a difference between my having speculated (on Talk:2014 Japanese Grand Prix) that the "surgery to reduce severe bruising to the head" that his father reported is actually surgery to reduce intracranial pressure by draining a subdural hematoma under a closed head fracture and possibly swelling due to brain bruising (and acknowledging that it would be a MASSIVE WP:SYNTH violation to actually put this in articlespace), and an IP cruising by to insert an unsourced and unexplained "he just died" on the talkpage after another IP had just had a clumsy attempt at tagging the article "DECEASED" reverted. One is speculation; the other is trolling. rdfox 76 (talk) 13:14, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

If you feel that strongly about it, you are on the wrong talk page. I personally can't read minds and am unable to comment regarding the motivation behind the edits made by the anon IP editor. But then again, I tend to have good faith in all editors, so I will assume he was not trolling and actually thought the guy had died. Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 16:08, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Car collection.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Car collection.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly 12:28, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

DS alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in the Electronic cigarette topic area. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33

Heat-not-burn tobacco product --RexxS (talk) 17:40, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Message on Heat-not-burn tobacco product

Hi, Sennen goroshi. I left you a message at Talk:IQOS#Large-scale revert of health information. Please leave me an answer there, as I won't be watching here. Thanks! HLHJ (talk) 04:56, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for responding, left a reply with queries. HLHJ (talk) 02:46, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Another reply. HLHJ (talk) 01:09, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Bye

You stay off my talk page permanently. Bye. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:39, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Sure. I don't see any need to comment on your talk page. I will however remove personal attacks as per . It's probably better than having someone report you. Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 22:44, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

An editor telling another that they are an idiot and insinuating they are illiterate is a personal attack. Responding to such attacks by suggesting the editor fuck off, while uncivil, is not a personal attack (i.e. there is no derogatory comment being made about the editor). No admin would block Dennis Bratland for that specific response in that specific situation.--Jezebel's Ponyo 22:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

So, just to clarify - I can tell other users to "fuck off" as and when I see fit, without any fear of sanction? Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 23:01, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

That's not what I wrote at all. I said the response was uncivil but not a personal attack. This is supported by policy and years of discussions at WP:ANI and the defunct civility noticeboard. I also wrote "No admin would block Dennis Bratland for that specific response in that specific situation". Nowhere did I assert that editors can repeatedly and gratuitously tell editors to "fuck off", "pound sand", "sling their hook", or <insert your preferred expression here> without a cause for concern. --Jezebel's Ponyo 23:10, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Okay, I got it. I can't just tell people to "fuck off" without due cause, but if I feel as if I am being attacked, it becomes a suitable response. Thanks for the clarification. Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 23:14, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Bentley 8 litre

Hi Sennen goroshi - I have reverted your edit to the Production car speed record for the Bentley 8 litre. One of the reasons pre-1945 cars were excluded is because there are number of unverifiable claims made as to their top speeds or the amount of modification allowed or the lack of verifiable evidence. For instance you asserted that the Bentley was the first production car to exceed 100mph, yet there are at least two earlier cars that make the same claim - a 1924 Hispano-Suiza H6C and a 1926 Bentley Speed Six. There were discussions at Talk:Production car speed record/Archive 2#Early production cars, and Talk:Production car speed record/Archive 3#Bentley 4½ Litre, Talk:Production car speed record/Archive 4#Post 1945 only? on the topic of pre 1945 cars. Maybe you would like to restart the discussion as those all seemed to end more or less unresolved because of the need to sort out the lists definitions. If the basic rules below from the list could be applied then we may be able to sort something useful out.

For the purposes of this list, a production car is defined as a vehicle that is:

• constructed principally for retail sale to consumers, for their personal use, to transport people on public roads (no commercial or industrial vehicles are eligible)
• available for commercial sale to the public in the same specification as the vehicle used to achieve the record
• pre-1981 vehicles must be made by the original vehicle manufacturer and not modified
• street-legal in its intended markets, having fulfilled the homologation tests or inspections required under either a) United States of America, b) European Union law, or (c) Japan) to be granted this status

sold in more than one national market.

NealeFamily (talk) 04:49, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

That's a fine reason for reverting, no worries. I was just looking at the lack of secondary sources and provided one - I didn't notice there was other issues. Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 07:18, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sennen goroshi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Blocked

Nyttend (talk) 16:13, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Fair enough. No matter if I think my edit was correct or not, there was edit warring on both sides, so a time out might calm things down. Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 20:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

BLP discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:47, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Reply to your edit summary

Hi - in response to your edit summary, I'd like to start by offering my own apology - I hadn't looked far enough back in the page history, and didn't realise the back and forth over the page title that you had had with the editor in question - I initially thought this was just about a couple of botched and self-reverted attempts to start a page move discussion. Having said that, a 4im vandalism warning still isn't appropriate - I think you could make a case for some kind of disruptive editing warning, in terms of trying to reinstate their preferred name without building consensus, but 4im vandalism? That's seems way over the top. GirthSummit _(blether) 19:52, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, and you're probably right. It was more of a warning designed to sound scary and persuade them to stop disrupting the article, than a warning designed to genuinely reflect their level of disruption. Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 21:45, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

Sennen goroshi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made three reverts and despite being reverted by the same editor a fourth time, I stopped reverting and instead made a 3RR report, demonstrating that I wanted to resolve the issue using Misplaced Pages procedures and had no intention of making further reverts Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 00:37, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Request withdrawn. I might have heard you out if not for your personal attack. 331dot (talk) 01:31, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Actually, forget it - I'd rather be blocked for 31 hours and keep my self-respect intact by stating it was a poor block made by an admin who doesn't seem very good at their job. It's okay, maybe they will improve one day. Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 00:53, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Just a note to say that I've reverted some of your recent personal attacks (and will remove them again if you attempt to reinsert them). Your bullying, passive aggression, and bizarre refusal to indent your comments properly suggest to me that you are doing more harm than good. If I see any indication that you intend to repeat such behavior in the future, I will pursue a site ban of your account at ANI. Lepricavark (talk) 18:16, 11 December 2019 (UTC)