Revision as of 00:10, 19 November 2019 editMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,142,123 edits →ArbCom 2019 election voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:00, 25 December 2019 edit undoHans Adler (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers26,943 edits delete unnecessary messageNext edit → | ||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
Thank you for your participation, ] 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC) | Thank you for your participation, ] 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
<!-- Message sent by User:Trizek (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=User:Trizek_(WMF)/sandbox/temp_MassMessage_list&oldid=19553910 --> | <!-- Message sent by User:Trizek (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=User:Trizek_(WMF)/sandbox/temp_MassMessage_list&oldid=19553910 --> | ||
== ArbCom 2019 election voter message == | |||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
</td></tr> | |||
</table> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=926750323 --> |
Revision as of 21:00, 25 December 2019
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
In the near future I may not read my talk page as frequently and reliably as I used to do. For urgent or important matters, it may be better to use email. I am actually completely inactive nowadays. If you leave a message here, don't rely on getting an answer in less than a couple of years.
I do not use "talkback" templates, and it rarely if ever makes sense to leave me such templates.
I could never see the point of the stickers I sometimes got in elementary school. Please do not embarrass me with "awards" or "barnstars" or the like.
I do not fancy non-consensual templated "WikiLove".
Interesting
I didn't check any of this, but Craig Murray is usually a very reliable source: The Philip Cross Affair.
- Fascinating. Thanks for pointing it out, Hans. (Good to see you.) --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 11:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Card games by mechanism or objective
A tag has been placed on Category:Card games by mechanism or objective requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:30, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Respite
If you find that you want something entirely unrelated to controversy to work on, there's an article on German buckets that needs some research. Uncle G (talk) 14:30, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
- Good try, but I remember well how this (wow! more than 10 years ago!) led to this, and today I won't let you do this to me!
- Reminds me of egg slicer, by the way. Hans Adler 15:39, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Try Forehead. ☺ I had actually forgotten the pigeons, and wasn't aware of what happened after AFD. You are not the only person whose spirits I am keeping up in these trying times. See User talk:Drmies/Archive 122. Uncle G (talk) 23:01, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
The best thing is that I now get to do this. Relaxen und watchen the Brieftaubefotografie!
- Hob, Dagmar (2014-11-28). "Als die Bilder fliegen lernten". Augsburger Allgemeine.
{{cite news}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Redaktion (2018-04-09). "„Flieg Taube flieg" — Geflügelte Pioniere der Luftbild-Fotografie". Berliner Umschau.
{{cite magazine}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - "Diese Fotos zeigen, dass Brieftauben die cooleren Drohnen waren". Journal Frankfurt. 2018-03-15.
{{cite magazine}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Deutsches Technikmuseum (2018-03-21). "Sonderausstellung: Die Brieftaube als Fotograf". YouTube.
{{cite web}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - "Die Brieftaube als Fotograf". Stiftung Deutsches Technikmuseum Berlin. 2018.
{{cite web}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - https://www.webstagram.one/media/BibuURhHOuB
- https://analoguestories.wordpress.com/2018/10/05/book-the-pigeon-photographer/
- Degiorgis, Nicoló; Solomon, Audrey (2017). The Pigeon Photographer: By Julius Neubronner & His Pigeons. Rorhof. ISBN 9788894881073.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help)
Uncle G (talk) 18:13, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
German philosophy
It may all end in tears, but enjoy this in the meantime. Uncle G (talk) 11:55, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process
Hello!
The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.
Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.
The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.
Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)