Misplaced Pages

Inherently funny word: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:22, 18 May 2003 editThe Cunctator (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators7,989 edits more commentary.← Previous edit Revision as of 19:18, 18 May 2003 edit undoThe Anome (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators253,694 edits * comic timingNext edit →
Line 29: Line 29:
* Are there any known ] or ] reasons for why these words are funny? * Are there any known ] or ] reasons for why these words are funny?
* Are the funny sounds the same in other languages? * Are the funny sounds the same in other languages?

See also:
* ]


== External links == == External links ==

Revision as of 19:18, 18 May 2003

Comedians have long regarded certain words as being inherently funny, and have used them to enhance the humour of their comic routines.

Examples of references to the concept:

These comedy routines, by propogating the meme that the words used are funny, increased the comedy potential of the words by adding another level of association to comedy.

In the English language, these tend to include words with the letters 'c' and 'k' in and words with the vowel sounds 'oo', 'o' and 'aa'.

For example:

Note also that "aardvark", "badger", "kumquat", "rutabaga", and "bassoon" refer to unusual items, which adds to their surprise/strangeness/humor potential.


Unresolved questions about inherently funny words include:

  • Are there any known physiological or linguistic reasons for why these words are funny?
  • Are the funny sounds the same in other languages?

See also:

External links

Inherently funny word: Difference between revisions Add topic