| Revision as of 22:49, 22 December 2006 editTom harrison (talk | contribs)Administrators47,534 edits Disruption← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:53, 22 December 2006 edit undoGiano II (talk | contribs)22,233 edits →the dreaded infoboxes: any more of your IRC plotting to "kill me" and I'll blow the lid off all your silly little gamesNext edit → | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| == the dreaded infoboxes == | == the dreaded infoboxes == | ||
| Hi Giano, | |||
| The hated infobox has been added to ]; it's ridiculous—bizarre compartmentalisation of the man, and repetition of info that's already in the text. Do you feel like weighing in with your opinion? The box-maniacs are gearing up for a squabble about it. | |||
| ] ] 14:23, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Disruption == | == Disruption == | ||
Revision as of 22:53, 22 December 2006
Old messages are at
- User talk:Giano archive 1(2004)
- User talk:Giano archive 2 (2005)
- User talk:Giano archive 3 (2005)
- User talk:Giano archive 4 (2006)
- User talk:Giano archive 5 (2006)
Please leave new messages at the foot of the page
Architecture notability
To counter spurious time consuming AfD's, I've had a stab at a draft policy for architectural notability here. I've attempted to restrict the scope of the proposal to actual 'works of architecture', architects, building technology and legal aspects of the profession. Buildings and structures notability enmasse should probably be a separate enterprise, or at least a later one. I need to give some thought to threshold notability and have shied away from minor works by major architects, because buildings are not like music or literature, they cannot generally be ignored by the public and play some kind of role in most built environments, so I argue the impact is beyond just they're effectiveness or otherwise as a work of art. Comments (by anyone) gladly received. Cheers --Mcginnly | Natter 21:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
the dreaded infoboxes
Disruption
Giano, I am 57 and this is just obnoxious. Your persistent incivility has passed the point of being disruptive. Please stop now. Tom Harrison 22:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)