Misplaced Pages

User:Argyriou/SirNicholas: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:Argyriou Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:07, 23 December 2006 editArgyriou (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,512 edits →does not understand policy← Previous edit Revision as of 02:22, 23 December 2006 edit undoArgyriou (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,512 edits →does not understand policy: add moreNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
*Unless the video's copyrights are exclusively owned by YouTube, no &ndash; you cannot link to the site. *Unless the video's copyrights are exclusively owned by YouTube, no &ndash; you cannot link to the site.
*YouTube links are either copyright infringements or not reliable. *YouTube links are either copyright infringements or not reliable.

==repeated deletions with failure to discuss==
*].
*]. Link removed by others, .. .


==incivility== ==incivility==

Revision as of 02:22, 23 December 2006

does not understand policy

  • The user Mahlenmahlen must mention on his YouTube page which shows the clip, or on his user page, if YouTube provides one; that he is either free-licensing it or releasing it in the creative-commons. Such assertions that he was the uploader of the file on YouTube cannot be under any terms of reasonability be accepted.
  • What exactly are you talking about? We do not need consensus on Talk:Barrington Hall for deciding if we need to keep YouTube video links on this website.
  • YouTube links are not reliable as any person with an internet connection can upload a file on their website.
  • Unless the video's copyrights are exclusively owned by YouTube, no – you cannot link to the site.
  • YouTube links are either copyright infringements or not reliable.

repeated deletions with failure to discuss

incivility

  • You are just not willing to cease your disruption? Get over it.
  • This user has not only assumed bad faith with me by putting a vandalism warning on my talk page; and then goes on to ruleslawyer about WP:EL, when it is clearly stating the obvious. It is obvious that he does not understand the policies and guidelines provided on Misplaced Pages..
  • Can you tutor me as to how to deal with those "clueless newbies" who do not understand the copyright laws?

lies

  • Yes, Tvoz, there is a difference of opinion on this matter, and all the administrators who are comfortably aware of the policies and guidelines of this place have their reasons as to why YouTube links should be removed. Have a look here User:Dmcdevit/YouTube (admin), User:J.smith/YouTube (admin). (reply)
  • Please do not disrupt Misplaced Pages. A consensus has been reached on the WP:ANI page.

abuse of process

User:Argyriou/SirNicholas: Difference between revisions Add topic