Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 10:27, 28 June 2020

Raging Stallion Studios

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Raging Stallion Studios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources do not prove any notability. I did some research myself and spite the company name comes out a lot (it's a company in the show business after all) I couldn't find any independent, extended, in-depth, secondary source which is what it is needed to establish notability. AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 09:32, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Shellwood (talk) 09:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:34, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:34, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails WP:NCORP with only trivial mentions by independent reliable secondary sources. Porn trade press consists of repackaged press releases and routine announcements. Porn or mainstream, industry awards count for little, if anything, towards WP:CORPDEPTH requirements. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
• Keep. There's coverage from Instinct about when the studio decided to go bareback; Out News about incorporating a MAGA hat in a film; Hornet about the release of a controversial film; and others. XBIZ has tons of articles on the studio. PinkNews called the studio a "major studio" and "high profile". Vice called the studio "one of America's biggest producers of gay porn". I think there's definitely enough to support a short article. --Kbabej (talk) 17:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

@Kbabej: none of these is an article about raging stallion, they are all article about people who work for raging stallion and incidental mention of the studio. --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 18:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Did you even look at the articles? The Instinct, Out, and Hornet articles are solely about the studio. ?? --Kbabej (talk) 18:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

@Kbabej: for "instinct" you are right actually, is "Hornet" a blog?. anyhow, those sources are either focused only on the fact that the company is doing bare back movies or are mentions. not a significant coverage as required in WP:CORPDEPTH --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 18:58, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

I fixed the link. Sorry about that. Hornet is a news site, and has bylines. As for the mentions, they describe the subject well. But the first three articles are in depth in RS. --Kbabej (talk) 19:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

• Hornet is a social networking site, which, by its own description, includes curated content. The key measure of reliability is that a the source has a good reputation for fact checking and that it is working in its fact-reporting voice. The Hornet article relies heavily on what Raging Stallion and its filmmakers say. Not very strong. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

• Keep as per Kbabej--Yiğitcank (talk) 19:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
• Keep. A disruptive nom at best. Raging Stallion is the largest gay porn producer in the world. Easily meets GNG, etc. Nom, again, has willfully ignored following WP:Before and should likely be banned from Xfd for their disruption. Gleeanon409 (talk) 09:21, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

this is not the fist time you personal attack me. I have created an article and improved many. So far when I have nominated an article, most of the times, was deleted because my nomination was right. now, leave me alone and if you care improve the source. --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 09:44, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Is this your own opinion or it can be proved by sources? so far I can't see any source fulfilling WP:CORPDEPTH but it seems that more than one here believes that everything related to porn should have a free pass to[REDACTED] no matter if there are no sources. --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 09:41, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

There is no personal attack, I’m pointing out you’ve again made mistakes, and again ignored WP:Before, these are apparent facts.

Cleaning up articles is fine, deleting ones on notable subjects is not. You don’t seem to recognize the difference and in violation of WP:DINC, seem to think others should drop everything their working on to prove you wrong. I did that last week and I’m no longer willing to play your game. If you’re not willing or able to do the needed research then move onto something you are good at, it’s unfair to make others clean up your mistakes. Gleeanon409 (talk) 10:27, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

• AfD debates (Organisation, corporation, or product)
• AfD debates