| Revision as of 12:07, 3 August 2020 editAlexandre8 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,245 edits →Do you even know what the word Vandalism means?: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:09, 3 August 2020 edit undoAlexandre8 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,245 edits →Do you even know what the word Vandalism means?Next edit → | ||
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
| == Do you even know what the word Vandalism means? == | == Do you even know what the word Vandalism means? == | ||
| Do not through around accusations of Vandalism when you yourself seem have been blocked for it in the past and caused a multitude of complaints. If you're not willing to engage on the talk page, or bother to read what's even written there, I suggest you reexamine that usefulness of |
Do not through around accusations of Vandalism when you yourself seem have been blocked for it in the past and caused a multitude of complaints. If you're not willing to engage on the talk page, or bother to read what's even written there, I suggest you reexamine that usefulness of your edits. ] (]) 12:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:09, 3 August 2020
April 2019
Please do not add defamatory content to Misplaced Pages, as you did to George Zimmerman, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 20:56, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
September 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at Republican Party (United States), you may be blocked from editing. Toa Nidhiki05 15:29, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
My editing was constructive, you're just biased.
Use of the Minor Edit tag
Please review WP:MINOR for what types of edits should be flagged as minor. In looking over your edit list you have used the tag extensively and in all cases I reviewed they wouldn't be considered minor. Springee (talk) 17:11, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
December 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to A Little Late with Lilly Singh, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. KyleJoan 14:26, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
January 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Southern United States, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. hulmem (talk) 01:04, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alerts for the areas of American politics and recently deceased or living people
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 17:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
NPOV and removal of sources and sourced content
You have received a handful of warning templates by now. It is not acceptable to use one's own commentary on who Andrew Brenner's base (as much as it may typify the modern GOP) is when the source cited makes no reference. This is particularly important in the context of BLP policy: whereas there are reliable sources that make direct analysis of Trump supporter demographics and racial attitudes, you did not produce any for Brenner. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 17:57, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
May 2020
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to All Lives Matter have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.Template:Z186 CLCStudent (talk) 15:28, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020
Hello, I'm Songwaters. Misplaced Pages is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to List of George Floyd protests in the United States seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. There have been multiple recorded instances of protesters, not just counter-protesters, committing acts of violence, so changing it to only mention "right-wing" violence is misleading and violates our neutrality policy. Songwaters (talk) 21:12, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at Columbus Division of Police, you may be blocked from editing. Ed6767 talk! 13:35, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Unless you can find a neutral, reliable third party source about the newspaper's political stance, it's a matter of opinion that it has a "conservative bias". Statements of opinion do not belong in an encyclopedia. Treybien (talk) 1:26 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Editing
Why are you going through so many different links and falsely editing them to make one group look better than another? A myth of heritage?!? How is a person's unique, inherited sense of family identity their values, traditions, culture, and etc handed down by previous generations a myth?? You are the definition of racist and you are the problem with America today. Robbob606 (talk) 12:48, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Continued edit warring
Your edits at Cultural genocide of Uyghurs have been repeatedly reverted. As your changes are disputed, the onus is on you to get consensus for the changes prior to restoring them. Please ensure you do so as persistent edit warring will likely lead to a block.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 22:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Slatersteven (talk) 12:30, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
If you try to add unsourced content again to the lede I will report you.Slatersteven (talk) 13:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
You're in the wrong here. First of all, the lead summarizes the body and doesn't need direct reference. Second, the content was established in the lead already and removed without consensus. It's reversion was a correct application of WP:BRD. You're wrong in your edit warring and now you're harassing me.Shadybabs (talk) 13:09, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Slatersteven (talk) 13:16, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Shadybabs, you appear to have reverted four times at UK Independence Party per the report at WP:AN3#User:Shadybabs reported by User:Slatersteven (Result: ). It would be logical for an admin to block you for 3RR violation. You may still have time to reply to the report. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:19, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Edit warring at UK Independence Party
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Do you even know what the word Vandalism means?
Do not through around accusations of Vandalism when you yourself seem have been blocked for it in the past and caused a multitude of complaints. If you're not willing to engage on the talk page, or bother to read what's even written there, I suggest you reexamine that usefulness of your edits. Alexandre8 (talk) 12:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)