Misplaced Pages

User talk:Shadybabs: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:09, 3 August 2020 editAlexandre8 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,245 edits Do you even know what the word Vandalism means?← Previous edit Revision as of 12:49, 3 August 2020 edit undoShadybabs (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users879 edits Blanked the pageTag: BlankingNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
== April 2019 ==
] Please do not add ] content to Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], especially if it involves ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-defamatory2 --> ] (]) 20:56, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

== September 2019 ==
] Please stop your ].
* If you are engaged in an article ] with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the ], and seek ] with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's ] page, and ask for independent help at one of the ].
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ].
If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> '''] ]''' 15:29, 15 September 2019 (UTC)


My editing was constructive, you're just biased.

== Use of the Minor Edit tag ==

Please review ] for what types of edits should be flagged as minor. In looking over your edit list you have used the tag extensively and in all cases I reviewed they wouldn't be considered minor. ] (]) 17:11, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

== December 2019 ==

] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of ], such as the edit you made to ], did not appear constructive and has been ]. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our ]. You can find information about these at our ] which also provides further information about ]. If you only meant to make test edits, please use ] for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive1 --> ]<sup>]</sup> 14:26, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

== January 2020 ==
] Please do not add or change content, as you did at ], without citing a ]. Please review the guidelines at ] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> ] (]) 01:04, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

== Discretionary sanctions alerts for the areas of American politics and recently deceased or living people ==

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] ] 17:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

== NPOV and removal of sources and sourced content ==

You have received a handful of ] by now. It is not acceptable to use ] on who Andrew Brenner's (as much as it may typify the modern GOP) is when the makes no reference. This is particularly important in the context of ]: whereas there are ] that make direct analysis of ] demographics and racial attitudes, you did not produce any for Brenner. <span style="color: #8B0000">Caradhras</span>Aiguo (<small>]</small>) 17:57, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

== May 2020 ==
] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that one or more of ]&nbsp;to ] have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the ]. Thanks.{{Z186}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ] (]) 15:28, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

== June 2020 ==
] Hello, I'm ]. Misplaced Pages is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a ]. Your recent edit to ] seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. ''There have been multiple recorded instances of protesters, not just counter-protesters, committing acts of violence, so changing it to only mention "right-wing" violence is misleading and violates our neutrality policy.'' <!-- Template:uw-npov1 --> ] (]) 21:12, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

] Please stop your ].
* If you are engaged in an article ] with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the ], and seek ] with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's ] page, and ask for independent help at one of the ].
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's ].
If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], you may be ]. '' ''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> ] ] 13:35, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

==Pittsburgh Post-Gazette==
Unless you can find a neutral, reliable third party source about the newspaper's political stance, it's a matter of opinion that it has a "conservative bias". Statements of opinion do not belong in an encyclopedia. ] (]) 1:26 18 June 2020 (UTC)

== Editing ==

Why are you going through so many different links and falsely editing them to make one group look better than another? A myth of heritage?!? How is a person's unique, inherited sense of family identity their values, traditions, culture, and etc handed down by previous generations a myth?? You are the definition of racist and you are the problem with America today. ] (]) 12:48, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

== Continued edit warring ==

Your edits at ] have been repeatedly reverted. As your changes are disputed, the onus is on ''you'' to get consensus for the changes ''prior'' to restoring them. Please ensure you do so as persistent edit warring will likely lead to a block.-- ]<sup>]</sup> 22:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
==July 2020==
] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->] (]) 12:30, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

If you try to add unsourced content again to the lede I will report you.] (]) 13:07, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

You're in the wrong here. First of all, the lead summarizes the body and doesn't need direct reference. Second, the content was established in the lead already and removed without consensus. It's reversion was a correct application of WP:BRD. You're wrong in your edit warring and now you're harassing me.] (]) 13:09, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
== Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion ==
]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 13:16, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
:Shadybabs, you appear to have reverted four times at ] per the report at ]. It would be logical for an admin to block you for 3RR violation. You may still have time to reply to the report. Thank you, ] (]) 14:19, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

== Edit warring at ] ==

<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. </div></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> Per . Thank you, ] (]) 15:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

== Do you even know what the word Vandalism means? ==

Do not through around accusations of Vandalism when you yourself seem have been blocked for it in the past and caused a multitude of complaints. If you're not willing to engage on the talk page, or bother to read what's even written there, I suggest you reexamine that usefulness of your edits. ] (]) 12:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:49, 3 August 2020

User talk:Shadybabs: Difference between revisions Add topic