| Revision as of 16:08, 30 August 2020 editTimothyBlue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users38,395 edits →Indian Springs Mall: ce← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:27, 30 August 2020 edit undoTenPoundHammer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers279,077 edits kNext edit → | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| Newspapers.com search revealed nothing other than routine coverage any mall would receive; announcements, events, advertising, etc. This is an everyday average mall. It is not notable. <span style="font-family:Courier New, Courier, monospace;"><strong> // ] :: </strong>] </span> 16:07, 30 August 2020 (UTC) | Newspapers.com search revealed nothing other than routine coverage any mall would receive; announcements, events, advertising, etc. This is an everyday average mall. It is not notable. <span style="font-family:Courier New, Courier, monospace;"><strong> // ] :: </strong>] </span> 16:07, 30 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''', clearly another ] argument from TimothyBlue. ] is not policy. The sources present do establish notability, and the only other people calling for deletion are just saying ] and ], neither of which is valid nor gives any proof to notability or lack thereof. The site of the mall , indicating that it had a long lasting impact. Buildings do not cease being notable when they are torn down. <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 17:27, 30 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:27, 30 August 2020
Indian Springs Mall
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Indian Springs Mall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A dead mall. The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." The subject does not have coverage that meets significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability. WP:BEFORE revealed advertising, WP:ROUTINE coverage of events and directory style listings. Sources in the article are a blog, a dead link, a facebook page, and an entry in an index of shopping centers. // Timothy :: talk 06:45, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 06:45, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 06:45, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 06:45, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Fine article. Hooker82 (talk) 08:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: non-notable mall which has since been demolished. -- Whiteguru (talk) 09:03, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per whiteguru. WikiMacaroons 15:21, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Notability is not temporary. Passes WP:GNG—-Paul McDonald (talk) 15:34, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Here is a list of the sources. None of these supports either WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD.
| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://books.google.com/books?id=vskSAQAAMAAJ&q=%22indian+springs%22+%22copaken%22&dq=%22indian+springs%22+%22copaken%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiLy8G2qqbWAhWF5iYKHZ2CAJoQ6AEIKDAA | 
|
|
 This is a simple entry in a directory. It does not provide WP:SIGCOV or any evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD
|
✘ No |
| KMBC-TV. |
|
|
A dead link with no information other than the station name.
|
✘ No |
| http://www.labelscar.com/kansas/indian-springs-mall |
|
|
A blog. Does not meet WP:RS and it does not provide any inforamtion that would make this mall notable or meet WP:NBUILD. It describes an everyday, average, normal failed mall.
|
✘ No |
| A facebook page | A facebook page
|
A facebook page
|
A facebook page.
|
✘ No |
| This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. | ||||
Newspapers.com search revealed nothing other than routine coverage any mall would receive; announcements, events, advertising, etc. This is an everyday average mall. It is not notable. // Timothy :: talk 16:07, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, clearly another WP:POINT argument from TimothyBlue. WP:ROTM is not policy. The sources present do establish notability, and the only other people calling for deletion are just saying WP:NOTNOTABLE and WP:PERNOM, neither of which is valid nor gives any proof to notability or lack thereof. The site of the mall is a topic of discussion long after the mall became defunct, indicating that it had a long lasting impact. Buildings do not cease being notable when they are torn down. Ten Pound Hammer • 17:27, 30 August 2020 (UTC)