| Revision as of 20:50, 29 August 2020 editZakaria1978 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,602 edits →The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:09, 25 October 2020 edit undoPhule lulu (talk | contribs)122 edits →Vandalsim on Shambuka wiki page: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thanks for maintaining the integrity of the Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 20:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC) | |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thanks for maintaining the integrity of the Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 20:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
| |}{{z147}} | |}{{z147}} | ||
| == Vandalsim on Shambuka wiki page == | |||
| ] Please explain the basis on which you removed many of the referenced scholarly sources on the wiki page till date, to push a narrative with one-sided point of view. You will have to explain the removal of references including but not limited to, The ] of Kalidasa, 'Perumal Thirumozhi' in ], and ] by Bhavabhuti. | |||
| When you want to only say it's an interpolation, provide the academic source which says it's an interpolation and the period during which interpolation happened. Based on the authors and their scholarship, this 'interpolation' theory can be one of the views but not 'the sole view', unless you bring evidence to categorically disregard all the relevant academic works by other authors. | |||
| That will be more constructive than removing all references which don't align with your point of view, and threatening other editors of 'blocking from editing' so you can reinstate your point of view. | |||
| ] (]) 19:09, 25 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:09, 25 October 2020
Wareon, you are invited to the Teahouse!
| [REDACTED] |
Hi Wareon! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC) |
Discretionary sanctions alert for India, Pakistan and Afghanistan
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 Note that North East Delhi riots is one of the many articles covered by these sanctions. Doug Weller talk 11:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
March 2020
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:2020 Delhi riots. This is in regard to your response to Fowler & Fowler. Please remember that discretionary sanctions cover talk pages as well - they cover all Misplaced Pages pages. Doug Weller talk 16:44, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Non admin closure of AFD Thakur Shivam Singh
Regarding your non-admin closure of Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Thakur Shivam Singh, an administrator reviewed sockpuppetry and explicitly left it open as the nomination had merit irrespective of the nominator being a sockpuppet. Please revert your closure. Thanks. -- Whpq (talk) 22:51, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Whpq: See WP:CSK #4. That admin saw comment of an account who supported deletion but soon that account was blocked for socking too. Wareon (talk) 07:02, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, but the the admin {User:MER-C) explicitly left it open, and the nomination does indeed have merit as the subject does not appear to meet WP:NPOL. So, please revert your closure.-- Whpq (talk) 11:19, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Misplaced Pages:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please bear these points in mind while editing Misplaced Pages:
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Misplaced Pages's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Misplaced Pages page and follow Misplaced Pages's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Misplaced Pages is not a forum.
The Misplaced Pages tutorial is a good place to start learning about Misplaced Pages. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:02, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi
Misty has been blocked as a confirmed sock. BabbaQ (talk) 18:31, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Breast Tax
If you have an issue with my close and feel that it does not reflect consensus, please take it up at the proper channel at WP:DRV. bibliomaniac15 04:50, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Kashmir conflict. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 05:31, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Minor edits
And just as a FYI, you shouldn't mark non-minor edits as minor ones. "Minor edit" means only edits that correct spelling or obvious grammatical errors, not ones that change the meaning of the text as was the case here; see Help:Minor edit.--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 07:13, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- It was automatically marked as "minor edit" because the revert was helped by WP:TWINKLE. Wareon (talk) 07:35, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Ah, I see—sorry for the misunderstanding. Have a nice Tuesday!--Karaeng Matoaya (talk) 08:23, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
| Thanks for maintaining the integrity of the Misplaced Pages. Zakaria1978 (talk) 20:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC) |
Vandalsim on Shambuka wiki page
Please explain the basis on which you removed many of the referenced scholarly sources on the wiki page till date, to push a narrative with one-sided point of view. You will have to explain the removal of references including but not limited to, The Raghuvaṃśa of Kalidasa, 'Perumal Thirumozhi' in Naalayira Divya Prabandham, and Uttararamacarita by Bhavabhuti.
When you want to only say it's an interpolation, provide the academic source which says it's an interpolation and the period during which interpolation happened. Based on the authors and their scholarship, this 'interpolation' theory can be one of the views but not 'the sole view', unless you bring evidence to categorically disregard all the relevant academic works by other authors.
That will be more constructive than removing all references which don't align with your point of view, and threatening other editors of 'blocking from editing' so you can reinstate your point of view.