Misplaced Pages

User talk:Publius In The 21st Century: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:52, 27 October 2020 editPublius In The 21st Century (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users948 edits →October 2020← Previous edit Revision as of 07:06, 27 October 2020 edit undoPublius In The 21st Century (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users948 edits →Managing a conflict of interestNext edit →
Line 233: Line 233:
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. ''Per ''<!-- THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY SHOULD BE REMOVED IF THE USER IS BLOCKED, OR IT IS DECIDED THAT THIS USER DOES NOT HAVE A COI, OR THIS TEMPLATE HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR A WHILE WITH NO ACTION. -->{{#ifexpr: ({{#time: U | now}} - 1603765586) < 13150000 | ] | }}<!-- Template:uw-coi --> ] (]) 02:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC) Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. ''Per ''<!-- THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY SHOULD BE REMOVED IF THE USER IS BLOCKED, OR IT IS DECIDED THAT THIS USER DOES NOT HAVE A COI, OR THIS TEMPLATE HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR A WHILE WITH NO ACTION. -->{{#ifexpr: ({{#time: U | now}} - 1603765586) < 13150000 | ] | }}<!-- Template:uw-coi --> ] (]) 02:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)


:{{u|Snowycats}} Hi Snowycats, as I state on your page, please read the exchange you cite carefully. You will see that the individual I am referring to ('the one I know') is not the subject of the page but rather a previous editor invoked by Marqardtika. You will also see that other editors seconded my complaint that Marqardtika was behaving disruptively. More to the point: it would be very odd indeed if Leonard Leo had paid someone to observe publicly his connections to large corporate interests and the ethically debatable use of shell companies to fund five campaigns for Supreme Court appointees. I therefore kindly request that this very perplexing accusation be withdrawn. I would of course be very happy to discuss this further to clarify in any way that I can. ] (]) 04:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC) :{{u|Snowycats}} Thanks for working so fairly to resolve this concern, and I'm glad to be able to clear my name on this score. ] (]) 07:06, 27 October 2020 (UTC)


== October 2020 == == October 2020 ==

Revision as of 07:06, 27 October 2020

This is Publius In The 21st Century's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

October 2020

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Misplaced Pages accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at ]. Thank you. Marquardtika (talk) 15:31, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Marquardtika, as I explain on your page, I am not a sockpuppet and welcome any investigation into my behavior. I believe you have made this allegation in bad faith to deflect from your bad faith behavior on Leonard Leo' page. I offer on a third. I welcome further dialogue on this matter. Publius In The 21st Century (talk) 14:57, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. KylieTastic (talk) 16:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
[REDACTED] Hello, Publius In The 21st Century! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 16:52, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Publius In The 21st Century, and Welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Nathan2055 18:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

October 2020

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:BH Group, from its old location at User:Publius In The 21st Century/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055 18:56, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

@Nathan2055: Thank you very much for this - I appreciate it! I will look forward to receiving further notification from submissions editors in due course. Publius In The 21st Century (talk) 20:16, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carrie Severino (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. MurielMary (talk) 09:54, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: CRC Advisors (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was: This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Snowycats (talk) 02:19, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carrie Severino (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was: This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Snowycats (talk) 02:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neil Corkery (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Snowycats were: This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Snowycats (talk) 02:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: BH Group (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. The comment the reviewer left was: A corp with one employee? Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Snowycats (talk) 02:22, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Judicial Education Project (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Snowycats were: This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Snowycats (talk) 02:22, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ann Corkery (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was: This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. The comment the reviewer left was: general promotional term and reads like a profile, rather than an encyclopedic article. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Snowycats (talk) 02:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Information icon Hello, Publius In The 21st Century. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Misplaced Pages, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Misplaced Pages's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Misplaced Pages:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Per Snowycats (talk) 02:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Snowycats Thanks for working so fairly to resolve this concern, and I'm glad to be able to clear my name on this score. Publius In The 21st Century (talk) 07:06, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Creative Response Concepts, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Snowycats (talk) 02:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

@Snowycats: Glad to have resolved, this, too, as a misunderstanding. Appreciate your dilligence and your time. Publius In The 21st Century (talk) 06:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wellspring Committee (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was: This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Snowycats (talk) 03:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Misplaced Pages account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Publius In The 21st Century, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Misplaced Pages administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Misplaced Pages policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Misplaced Pages community.

Snowycats (talk) 03:37, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

@Snowycats: Very glad to have resolved this as a misunderstanding; thank you for the fair and judicious treatment here. Publius In The 21st Century (talk) 06:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

User talk:Publius In The 21st Century: Difference between revisions Add topic