Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Alexandria (talk | contribs) at 01:35, 30 April 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Star Wars Episode 7

Star Wars Episode 7 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Contested prod; prod reason was Misplaced Pages is not a crystal ball. I wasn't the original prod tagger, but I agree that it's unlikely that reliable sources exist to support this article. JavaTenor 17:48, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

• Strong delete. Fails WP:V as the sources listed aren't reliable, WP:NOR as most of that "plot" looks hand-written, and WP:CRYSTAL as the article is about a movie that hasn't been announced and may not even ever come out. - Chardish 19:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as unverifiable. The two external links provided are insufficient. (I checked them.) YechielMan 19:20, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm pretty sure that Lucas has more or less stated that he doesn't plan on ever producing this movie. As there's no source for this massive plot summary, there's nothing we can keep here. Zetawoof 19:37, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep, as relevant to one of the, if not the, most successful film franchises in history. We have articles about movies and games and even architectural structures that have been cancelled or not completed, so even if it doesn't happen to be made, so long as the project got underway at some point it will have lasting cultural and historic importance to millions. --164.107.223.217 20:53, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment This anonymous user has voted Keep in every AfD he's voted in. JuJube 00:20, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

So what? If I find one that I agree should be deleted, I promise that I will vote as such, but if I have a reason to keep, why not share it? Should I comment that you mostly vote to delete articles based on your recent history as evidence of something? --164.107.223.217 00:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

• Strong delete. With all due respect to Mark, talking about it does not make it notable - nor does it even guarantee that Lucas will do anything with it. First line in the article notes that Lucas isn't going with this, and the plotline seems entirely speculative anyway. Major crystalballery, no reliable sources to back it up. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete Hmm only two references and oooh look there both forums. Not Verifiable and it looks like a fanfic of horid perportians. DBZROCKS 22:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, sources aren't reliable and don't discuss the content of most of the article (the plot details). The fact that George Lucas once planned to make Episodes 7-9, but doesn't plan to anymore, can be mentioned (if it isn't already) in the articles on Lucas & Star Wars. NawlinWiki 22:50, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not happening. JuJube 23:29, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete Another page like this for ep 7 was made, it was speedy deleted Whstchy 01:35, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

• AfD debates (Fiction and the arts)
• AfD debates