This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jj137 (talk | contribs) at 23:06, 12 February 2008 (Reverted edits by Jj137 (talk) to last version by Telefantasy). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:06, 12 February 2008 by Jj137 (talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by Jj137 (talk) to last version by Telefantasy)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- Please add new entries at the bottom of this page.
- Please SIGN your entry with ~~~~
- If you are here to report a vandal, please use WP:AIV., unless I'm online.
- Archives
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Lilia Zaiarna
Hi, I am most surprised at the outcome of this debate. I understand that it involves more than counting votes, but there were four votes in favour of delete and only two for keep. How does that equate to "possibility leaning towards keep"? The article still remains devoid of independent references, and claims of notability are unproven. Before I plan any further response, I am interested in knowing more of your reasons for maintaining this article. Thanks, WWGB (talk) 04:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- The fact that one of the reference is independent or not is in question, however, it is a reliable source nevertheless. The subject has won two awards, which establishes somewhat of a notability, according to WP:MUSIC, if barely. Some of the deletion comments I find on the debate seemed irralevent to the discussion, such as POV issues and copyvio. If there is an evidence which shows that the source is not independent then I'm probably willing to consider its deletion, however, I do not see any evidence of that so far, as it seems that the independency of the source can probably be debated for weeks. So, basically a somehwat reliable source plus with some awards won shows some borderline notability. The "possibily leaning towards keep" is very weak, I would say, and it is more based on the arguments presented rather than the number of votes there are, especially with one of the !votes which brings issues that are irrelevent to the deletion criteria. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 04:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Deletion review
By "rationale", I meant fair use rationale, which the images were deleted for lacking. --NE2 05:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- I don't have the images, so they would need to be undeleted so I can add the rationale. There should probably be a speedier process for this, but I couldn't find one. --NE2 05:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Why is it a problem to restore the original information? --NE2 07:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- I don't work with images, and I think you are probably more familiar with images than I do. I have no idea what tags go with what kind of images, or what kind of criteria's there are for images. So rather than restoring the image without knowing what to do with it, I will rather trust your editorial judgement on what to do with the images. However, I do plan on getting familiar with working with images somewhere in the future, but probably not until I get enough free time. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 07:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- There was nothing wrong with the image; it just needed the proper hoop jumped through. I will do that if they are undeleted; I see no reason the old image description shouldn't remain. --NE2 07:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm, fair enough, I undeleted these images. If you are going to add the fair use rationale, please do it as soon as possible. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 07:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. I have completed my work. --NE2 07:46, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm, fair enough, I undeleted these images. If you are going to add the fair use rationale, please do it as soon as possible. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 07:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- There was nothing wrong with the image; it just needed the proper hoop jumped through. I will do that if they are undeleted; I see no reason the old image description shouldn't remain. --NE2 07:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for you for your comments on our AFD. Since[REDACTED] is allowing and suggesting article recreation, we would greatly appreciate your help in the matter of a re-write. We understand the original entry for Dungeon Majesty was poorly written and would like to present the following as reference for our newest entry:
Dungeon Majesty is a fantasy television show created by Telefantasy Studios. The show is based on the popular roll-palying game Dungeons and Dragons. Eight episodes in all, the allure of Dungeon Majesty is found in it's low fi charm reminiscent of the bygone era of science fiction television shows "Dr Who" and "Land of the Lost" as well as the shows D.I.Y. statement of creating new television.
The show first aired on public access stations in New York and Angeles in 2004 and when broadcast on the interent, became a popular viral internet videos. Landing their first video "Geek Girls Play D&D" in the list of top 10 interet videos of all time, according to iFilm.
In 2005, the cult tv show became so popular that MTV2 asked the production team to create 12 shorts which were then put into rotation between music videos.
Dungeon Majesty has garnered press in "Dragon Magazine", "RES magazine", "Lumpen magazine" ,appeared on G4 Tech TV's "Attack of the Show" and "The Screen Savers, as well as World of Wonder's "Ring My Bell". In 2005 Dungeon Majesty was included in XTREME Fashion a crtitcal look at the influence of costume and new media published by Prestel Books.
The cast was often asked to be special guests and lecturers at gaming conventions around the country including KublaCon and GenCon. As well as have shows in galleries and theatres around the world. Taking the han
Wizards of the Coast,the organization which own the rights to Dungeons and Dragons, openly embraced the show and in 2006, held a contest based on a Dungeon Majesty short titled "WORLD OF ADVENTURE". The winner of THE WORLD OF ADVENTURE SWEEPSATKES was given a series of books including Cityscape and Fiendish Codex II: Tyrants of the Nine Hells.
In 2007 Dungeon Majesty teamed up with Leslie Hall, to create the video "Willow Don't Cry" animated video inspired by the film "Willow" which premiered at the Hammer Museum, Los Angeles.
In the same year Dungeon Majesty was part of Version Festival, a major new media arts festival in Chicago.
References: Hunter, Sandy "D&DIY FILM" Res Magazine May/June 2005 Campbell, Eric "Dungeon Majesty" Dragon magazine December 2004 Smith, Courtenay "Xtreme Fashion" Prestel Books 2005 Gent, Aron "Telefantasy Stuios" Lumpen Magazine January 2008
4 Television Apearance 1:
http://www.g4tv.com/screensavers/episodes/3953/Dungeon_Majesty_Game_Developers_Conference_Batmobile.html
Geek Girls Play D&D : http://www.spike.com/search?query=Geek+Girls+play+D%26D&s=Search
Headline artsts at Version Festival Chicago 2007: http://www.lumpen.com/VERSION7/index.html
WIZARDS OF THE COAST hosted a contest based on a film by Dungeon Majesty: http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/alumni/20061205a
SPECIAL GUESTS at Gaming conventions: http://www.kublacon.com/guests/sg_majesty.html
5 page write up in the book XTREME FASHION: http://www.amazon.com/Xtreme-Fashion-Courtenay-Smith/dp/3791331752
SCREENING AT HAMMER MUSEUM IN BILLY WILDER THEATRE-March 2007 http://www.hammer.ucla.edu/
Collaborations with Leslie Hall: http://www.willowdontcry.com/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK9GPTY3dM8
Contributors to Select Meia Festival: http://selectmediafestival.org/2007/
Nuggets from the Net January 8, 2008 http://www.g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/tag/138/Nuggets_From_The_Nets.html
Select Reviews and Articles: HACKWRITERS.COM http://www.hackwriters.com/DM3.htm