This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk | contribs) at 14:08, 18 June 2008 (req move). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:08, 18 June 2008 by Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk | contribs) (req move)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This template must be substituted. Replace {{Requested move ...}} with {{subst:Requested move ...}}. Template:WikiProject Music venues
Merge with KOKO (venue)
Given that these two are the exact same building and are already overlapping in their history of the building's usage, I think they only need one article. --McGeddon 10:40, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- And given that nobody's commented for a month, I've now merged these articles. --McGeddon 11:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure you've merged them the right way though. Camden Palace is only one name it's been known by. I think it may be better at KOKO. Secretlondon 20:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- I second this, it should be changed to Koko as this is it's current name. After all, the building is ancient and it's only been known as Camden Palace for 22 years of it's long history. Also I don't think it's correct stating that 'The Camden Palace was a nightclub...', it makes it sound like it doesnt exist anymore, as it does just under a different name. Norman22b
Requested move
I've put in a move request as this venue is definitely not called Camden Palace any more, and has not been for the majority of its life. Therefore, the name used should be its current one, KOKO. Dancarney (talk) 14:08, 18 June 2008 (UTC)