Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RFC bot (talk | contribs) at 15:00, 13 August 2008 (Update, 15 current discussions). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:

• Talk:Negroid image may reflect out of date or racist science
• Talk:Pearl Harbor advance-knowledge debate Is this article too long and should it follow a "For vs. Against" outline for clarity?
• Talk:Thomas Hobbes Are there sufficient reliable, secondary sources to warrant calling Thomas Hobbes a classical republican?
• Talk:Miroslav Filipović Are eye witness accounts from a controversial work, Magnum crimen, considered reliable sources
• Talk:Taxila Is Taxila Ancient India or Ancient Pakistan
• Talk:Northport, New York back and forth edits on historic importance of current and future events, appropriateness of naming businesses, and notability of a weekly sale. Arguments for and against are listed in the section above and here
• Talk:1984 Request help with whether comments constitute weasel words.
• Talk:September 11, 2001 attacks Whether it is good or bad proses to use the word "attacks" to define "attack" and whether or not it is original research to use a wikipedia-created title in the introductory sentence rather than the terminology used by respected reliable sources such as CNN, CBC, CBS, and the BBC.
• Talk:Money dispute as to whether money can consist of material with intrinsic value without a certifying authority, or whether it requires a "trusted" certifying authority (also reported to RFChist)
• Talk:Flag of Dorset User is alleging article is corporate vanity
• Talk:Comfort women Editors cannot verify citations for controversial sentences

For more information, see User:RFC bot