This is an old revision of this page, as edited by End of yarn (talk | contribs) at 22:19, 27 April 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:19, 27 April 2009 by End of yarn (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality: Very well written, terse
- B. MoS compliance: No major issues that go against conventions
- A. Prose quality: Very well written, terse
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources: Yes, excellently sourced with very reliable sources
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Yes
- C. No original research: Yes; all claims are thoroughly cited
- A. References to sources: Yes, excellently sourced with very reliable sources
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects: Yes, covers all parts of the issue (i would know because this is my area of specialty)
- B. Focused: Yes
- A. Major aspects: Yes, covers all parts of the issue (i would know because this is my area of specialty)
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias: Not really a problem in this type of article
- Fair representation without bias: Not really a problem in this type of article
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc: Yes
- No edit wars, etc: Yes
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: Well illustrated
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: PASS
- Pass or Fail: PASS