This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Socrates2008 (talk | contribs) at 06:01, 9 May 2009 (→Haseldine-specific editing: Response). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:01, 9 May 2009 by Socrates2008 (talk | contribs) (→Haseldine-specific editing: Response)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Haseldine article
FYI, he was quoting Dukakis in calling South Africa a "terrorist state" - see the last sentence in his letter (the image) in the Patrick Haseldine article where he specifically refers to this. Socrates2008 (Talk) 23:11, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Quite right - missed that. Apologies. Checkeroffacts (talk) 06:26, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- This is the reference that Socrates2008 is referring to: Dukakis Backers Agree Platform Will Call South Africa 'Terrorist'. The image in question is here and your vote following the IfD discussion would be appreciated here.PJHaseldine (talk) 21:10, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Haseldine at St Ignatius College
Sorry about not spotting that that was a mirror - it has just the introduction of a very old revision of the Patrick Haseldine article... Dark-Fire (talk) 19:23, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Haseldine-specific editing
May I ask why all your edits are limited specifically to Patrick Haseldine and associated articles? Socrates2008 (Talk) 12:20, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Of course, though I choose not to reply! single purpose accounts are not considered inherently legitimate, but I do hope you will alert me if a single edit is in any way inapppropriate? Checkeroffacts (talk) 19:42, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Fair enough that you choose to keep your reasons to yourself. However I feel that your edits may be construed as hounding, and would therefore encourage you to give it a break now. Socrates2008 (Talk) 06:01, 9 May 2009 (UTC)