This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tedder (talk | contribs) at 00:17, 4 June 2009 (→Fringe theory?: add ANI link for dbratland). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:17, 4 June 2009 by Tedder (talk | contribs) (→Fringe theory?: add ANI link for dbratland)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Bike articles
I noticed your frustration while editing the Ninja 250 article... why indeed is the overall quality of bike articles on wiki so low? No uniformity, cohesiveness... sigh... AniRaptor2001 19:34, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not really feeling frustrated. Just saying how you fix one thing and that leads to ten other things that also have to be fixed. In truth I'm kind of happy to know that I won't run out of things to do. But sometimes it seems daunting...Dbratland (talk) 01:01, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hi Dbratland, and a warm welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Misplaced Pages? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!
- Editing tutorial, learn to have fun with Misplaced Pages.
- Picture tutorial, instructions on uploading images.
- How to write a great article, to make it an featured article status.
- Manual of Style, how articles should be written.
Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :
Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)
- Mailer Diablo 15:25, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Ducati 65T
Hi. Regarding this article you recently created; the original version was not a suitable Misplaced Pages page, because an article cannot be just an infobox. I've 'wikified' it a bit, and now it looks OK as a stub. Please compare the original version to the version after my edits.
Please remember that Misplaced Pages articles are always 'live'. If you're working on articles, planning to fix them later, you should develop them in your user space, by creating a page such as User:Dbratland/Ducati 65T - fix it up there before copying it over to mainspace.
If you need help with anything, either place a {{helpme}} on this page (with a question), or talk to us live.
You could also contact me directly, on my talk page.
Cheers, Chzz ► 03:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Motorcycling Italian Motorcycles
Thanks for joining the Italian Motorcycles Special Interest Group. You are right there is a lot to do but I've had encouraging feedback from around the world for the work I've been doing on Category:British motorcycles so it is worth it. it would be good if we can do the same with the Category:Italian motorcycles Cheers Thruxton (talk) 18:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm really excited that somehow the Berliner Motor Corporation article seemed to fall into place. I was afraid I'd couldn't pull a coherent story together about them. I'm hoping it is in a state that will attract more interest, for example from the Norton and Matchless experts who probably know a lot about that side of the Berliner story. Dbratland (talk) 19:01, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
TUSC token 3e54feeb1c7c7cfa37a8ee64636565ae
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Speedy deletion nomination of Aeromere/Capriolo
A tag has been placed on Aeromere/Capriolo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Garyzx (talk) 01:08, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Terra Modena.png
Thank you for uploading File:Terra Modena.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY 03:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:MAIDS log.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:MAIDS log.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:35, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
userboxes and bikes
Heh, nice userbox. And what bikes do you have? (I currently have a DL650 and a DRZ400S, but I've had quite a few others) tedder (talk) 04:47, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- The four in the pictures. The last two pictures are actually of my bikes, and the first two are only examples of the same model. And actually the Ninja 250 is my wife's bike, and while the Yamaha Vino 125 is mine, she is the only one riding it for whatever reason. I'm hoping the Ducati Bronco will at least run, if not ride, by the end of the summer. If not I'm stuck with just the Ducati Sport1000, which is great but sometimes I think it's too much. I'm constantly thinking of selling it and getting 2 or 3 smaller, lighter, and perhaps older, bikes; so I can finally try a dual sport or supermoto, among others. But I'll probably keep it at least until the economy rebounds. My recent return to WP is due to researching the Bronco 125 and then the Berliner Motor Corporation and then one thing led to another... --Dbratland (talk) 04:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Ah. Wondered where the Bronco came from- good work on that article. My wife had a ninjette, which was a blast, but it isn't my type of bike. tedder (talk) 05:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Please stop
Please stop making personal insults such as, "certain people will stop at nothing to keep a fight going...". I'm just trying to make sure the article is accurate and that we don't perpetuate any myths. I'm sure you want that too. --Born2cycle (talk) 01:20, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- If you have a reliable source who says there is a myth that needs to be dispelled, cite them.--Dbratland (talk) 01:35, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Why cite something for a claim that the article is not making, nor even implying? I honestly don't know whether "lane-splitting is always illegal in all states but California" is a myth or not. As far as I can tell, no one knows for sure. But we do have to provide reliable sources for claims made in the article. I have not seen any reliable sources that support that claim. Requiring reliable sources is how we avoid perpetuating myths that might be out there. You seem to be convinced that I have some nefarious motive other than that (which says more about you than me), but I assure you that's all this is about, and my posts are consistent with that. --Born2cycle (talk) 05:41, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- You seem unable to do anything but keep the same argument going. From your history, I can see I'm not the first, nor the second, to make this observation. Others, too, have come to believe your goal is the dispute itself. Why not accept mediation? Unless you don't want it to be settled, perhaps?--Dbratland (talk) 05:55, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
(OD) Can you answer born2cycle's question/comment? I'm trying to remain neutral, so if you could explain, I think it would be helpful. tedder (talk) 11:10, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
well done!
Nice job on the List of motorcycle manufacturers, especially this edit. tedder (talk) 05:32, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Fringe theory?
I seem to have really gotten under you skin. Sorry about that. Here is the description about one of the key sources to the article you just claimed is "fringe theory"
Bicycling & The Law, by Bob Mionske, is a comprehensive primer on all facets of the law as it pertains to the average cyclist. Published in 2007, Bicycling & the Law is the first book on bicycle law written for the average cyclist since The Road Rights and Liabilities of Wheelmen, published at the height of the bicycle's golden age in 1895. In The Road Rights and Liabilities of Wheelmen, cyclists were advised of their right to the road, which had been secured in a series of court cases and legislation in the 1880s and 1890s. In Bicycling & The Law, cyclists are advised on their legal rights developed in the century since the publication of The Road Rights and Liabilities of Wheelmen, including their legal right to the road, extending back to those early cases. Cyclists are also advised on their legal rights and duties, as well as how to handle their own traffic ticket, common bicycle accidents, how to avoid them, and what to do if the cyclist is involved in an accident, how to insure themselves, legal responses to harassment of cyclists, lemon laws and warranties, how to protect against bicycle theft, and contractual issues cyclists commonly face.
That's fringe theory??? New ideas??? --Born2cycle (talk) 19:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)