This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) at 00:25, 19 July 2009 (Closing debate, result was keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:25, 19 July 2009 by Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was keep)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. If anybody besides the nominator disagrees with this close feel free to revert. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Center for Range Voting
AfDs for this article:- Center for Range Voting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete. non-notable per this debate. Cordyceps2009 (talk) 21:43, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. nomination by single-purpose account, registered and immediately filed, only edits are this nomination. The discussion cited was in 2006, the sources in the present article were not available then. The nominator then was also an SPA, Yellowbeard dedicated to AfDing topics related to Range voting, subsequently indef blocked for disruption. I'll file a sock report, new editors don't ordinarily immediately dive into AfD process. --Abd (talk) 01:23, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 02:47, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Merge to range voting. Insufficient notability for stand-alone article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:31, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I have no problem with a merge, given how little information there is in the article, but that's an ordinary editorial decision, it doesn't require an AfD. With a merge, if more RS appears, the article can easily be brought back, it's far better than a deletion, and far more useful to readers, since, if they look up the Center, they will find the information. If it were deleted, they would get nothing. We can't merge while it's under AfD, so .... --Abd (talk) 12:18, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC) - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.