Misplaced Pages

Talk:Death and state funeral of Ariel Sharon

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mojo Hand (talk | contribs) at 16:19, 2 March 2014 (Log AfD). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:19, 2 March 2014 by Mojo Hand (talk | contribs) (Log AfD)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Death and state funeral of Ariel Sharon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

  • You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
  • You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
  1. Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
  2. Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

  • Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
  • Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconIsrael Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Project Israel To Do:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPolitics Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconDeath
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 21 February 2014. The result of the discussion was keep.

Links

>> The world reacts to Ariel Sharon's death>> Sharon Lauded as Israeli Protector While Palestinians Scorn Him >> Thousands pay last respects to Ariel Sharon >> Israel steps up security for Sharon's funeral>> Israel stages state memorial for Ariel Sharon>> ariel-sharon-warrior-war-criminal>> Sharon buried in Israel state ceremony>> ariel-sharon-warrior-war-criminal>> Sharon buried in Israel state ceremony>> Sharon: The architect of terror (Lihaas (talk) 05:50, 12 January 2014 (UTC)).

Arik

Is there a better way to phrase this? I understand why the current text calls out this usage, but since we don't discuss Sharon's nickname in this article, the looks like it is marking an error, rather than the deliberate use of a familiar name by someone close to him. If I had a better suggestion, I would supply it, but regardless I think this part of the article needs improvement. 172.9.22.150 (talk) 00:50, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Forget it. Bladesmulti (talk) 00:52, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Removed. You don't use sic for nicknames, you use it when you are quoting something with an error in it and want to show that the error was made in the original. Downwoody (talk) 01:28, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
A better way of pointing out the nickname is to say something like Peres, referring to Ariel Sharon by his nickname, "Arik", said:" but you simply don't write (sic) after a nickname. Downwoody (talk) 01:32, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Quotefarm

This article is a rather unhealthy quotefarm of empty rhetoric. I have just pared down some of the quotes, and will continue to consolidate and pare down as more reactions become available. -- Ohc  09:25, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

No you will not do it as you see fit. Your idea of someone being notable or not is not objecvtive fact. The Palestinian leader you removed was not supported by others. Further, your arbitrary nature of paring down as you see fit is not objective either.
Further yet, you seem to indicate you will go about doing things your way and that is not constructive editinglLihaas (talk) 11:32, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Even if you think the Palestinian you insist on quoting verbatim was notable, and the jury seems to be out on him, what he said was vitriolic rant that I excised with all the "sweet nothings" from other Likud politicians. Of course we should have appropriate quotes, but my approach is to summarise and use quotes in moderation, and is if anything less more "arbitrary" than your inclusionist "quote everything that can be cited to the media" approach. You're dead wrong if you think that if it's sourced it should not be removed. And if you're just looking for coverage from people who hated him, for some "balance", you ought to consider covering the angle that many Israelis hated him for what he did. Plenty of quotable quotes there. Have with it. -- Ohc  13:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Nice one User talk:Ohconfucius, have to avoid quote farming, and don't add any red link no namers either. Bladesmulti (talk) 13:14, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

All over bar the shouting?

I'm amazed at just how fast the quotefarm grew. Two days after the funeral, and the article has hardly moved. Oh, don't I know... Sound bites grab your attention for next to no effort. It's all bling. Quotes are easy: just copy and then paste. Like this disgraceful dumping of an entire gratuitous quote into an article which then stayed for 7 months until someone (yours truly) saw fit to pare it down to size.

Let's build an article worthy of the title. We need to write more encyclopaedic content and not copy or otherwise replicate news stories, but it's harder work. There are sufficient sources for the funeral.. There are lots of reactions that don't eulogise him that need to be written about. But if the presently assembled editors are no longer interested in following through, we may be better off changing the title to Reactions to the death of Ariel Sharon; or redirect the name space back to the biography and be done with it. -- Ohc  07:21, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Dignitaries that DID NOT ATTEND

Perhaps something should be included about the fact that no dignitaries from the Arab World, Africa, or Latin America attended his funeral. This surely reflects his legacy: http://www.timesofisrael.com/senior-egyptian-diplomat-quietly-attends-sharon-memorial-ceremony/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.71.137.68 (talk) 20:45, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

In short, nothing effects his legacy. Bladesmulti (talk) 12:27, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
Talk:Death and state funeral of Ariel Sharon Add topic