This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TheSawTooth (talk | contribs) at 17:31, 3 November 2014. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:31, 3 November 2014 by TheSawTooth (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)ERA
Hi, I reverted your sweeping change to this article for a number of reasons, here are a few:
- Blog posts are not suitable sources
- Press releases are not suitable sources
- An article about a company which recycles does not need descriptions of what recycling is or general concepts of recycling - that information is provided via wikilinks
- Despite your edit to the talk page you clearly don't have a NPOV, expanding everything but the controversy section greatly and editing only this one topic is not 'neutral'
- Using weasel words like 'apparently'
- You synthesised refs discussing recycling in general with the ERAs mission statement
- Including needlessly detailed information in contravention of the general manual of style
And so on. I think you should probably avoid editing in this area which you appear to have a close connection with until you're more familiar with Wikipedias rules and guidelines. Cheers, Nikthestunned 09:36, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
I move to dispute your disruption of my fresh attempt to rewrite. I have no connection with this company whatsoever. I have not used any unnecessary positive language for subject or weasel words as you say. Also I move to dispute your claim of sources I have taken from news papers. I request you to read that I have also expanded controversy section much by verifying sources and I here by request you to read the source that is referred as my conclusion is written after reading that. Have you read it or are you just disputing without doing that? I removed one blog source. I advise you not to remove anything such massive in a manner that does not suit civilized persons and let me finish my genuine editing. You are welcome to ask for corrections on subject's talk page or to me but do not disrupt!!! --TheSawTooth (talk) 16:27, 3 November 2014 (UTC)