This is an old revision of this page, as edited by OccultZone (talk | contribs) at 21:49, 17 January 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:49, 17 January 2015 by OccultZone (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Xharm, you are invited to the Teahouse!
| [REDACTED] |
Hi Xharm! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Misplaced Pages; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! 78.26 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:19, 8 January 2015 (UTC) |
Commenting on AfD
Stop copying comment of others. It is not a personal attack if someone is making the comment on your conduct. Neither you are allow to make a baseless conversation through copy-pasting others comment. Read WP:BLUD.
- It is not necessary or desirable to reply to every comment in a discussion.
- The more often you use the same reason in a given discussion, the weaker it becomes.
You have already repeated the same point for about 3 times now, that "most of the sources don't mention the subject", and you were answered by at least 2 editors that AfD is not for cleanup. Your continued repitition of same point is only making the argument look more boring and clearly seems like you are not reading. Unless you can prove that the article is not notable, mentioned nowhere in any of the reliable sources, you can still continue to argue. But at this stage and for this kind of AfD I really don't see reason that why you have to continue arguing anymore. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 21:49, 17 January 2015 (UTC)