Misplaced Pages

User talk:RHaworth/2019 Apr 27

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:RHaworth

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Meta in MA (talk | contribs) at 12:47, 18 April 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 12:47, 18 April 2019 by Meta in MA (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:RHaworth. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.


Archives

Archives
Edit list
Up to:

Request for archive of BLP for Alina von Davier

Hi User:RHaworth, I am requesting an archive copy of the deleted page Draft:Alina von Davier. Can you email an archived copy of the page? It was deleted on April 4, 2019. Thank you, Atomburke1 (talk) 18:58, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Please restore sandbox asap

Greetings User:RHaworth, Earlier today you deleted a newbie sandbox without warning, to my knowledge. This is the edit: 15:53, April 8, 2019 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page User:Leandramarie/sandbox (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion in userspace) The student whose sandbox you deleted is working as a part of a WikiEd Foundation class, and the profile should have been labeled this way. We are now at the end of the semester and the student is waiting for a grade. You are preventing that student from receiving that grade as you have deleted their work. Please restore and provide a justification for this decision.

In the future, I would appreciate you notifying me of your intentions to do things like this. Instructors are clearly noted as being connected to these pages so that things like this do not happen. A note on my talk page, at minimum, would be appreciated. I hope that you will make this a top priority, as your actions may have implications for the class. Best, -- Jaobar (talk) 03:05, 10 April 2019 (UTC) CC: User:Ian (Wiki Ed);User:Shalor (Wiki Ed)

Jaobar pinged me about this because of my Wiki Education role. I looked at the deleted version of User:Leandramarie/sandbox, and it's not a G11 - it's simply an expansion of the existing Just Do It page. There are a few words in there that aren't quite encyclopaedic, but a few words don't make it a G11. The only problem I see is that it incorporates text from an existing article without proper attribution. But that's an easy-enough fix.
As an aside, could you take a closer look at some of Jebcubed's G11 noms. They're well-meaning, but this is the second bad nom I've come across is the past day. — User:Ian (Wiki Ed)/Guettarda (talk) 13:00, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you both for your help restoring the sandbox. Best, -- Jaobar (talk) 16:17, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Request for undeletion/G12

Hi, I'd like to ask you the undeletion of the Draft:Ruben Vergara Meersohn. I would like to edit the page according to your feedback and restore it. — Fcallagher (talk) 08:26, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Apologies, I thought all the links listed in your edit notice were acceptable formats, now it should be edited in the appropriate format: Draft:Ruben Vergara Meersohn. — Fcallagher (talk) 11:10, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation, I followed the steps and my email should be connected. — Fcallagher (talk) 15:39, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

File:YoshiinYCW.png

Hi RHaworth. You deleted this file a little over a month ago. I'm wondering if it's similar in terms of licensing to File:Mega Rayquaza.png also uploaded by the same editor. The Mega Rayquaza file seems to be either a outright copyright violation or a WP:DERIVATIVE with the copyright on the original imagery held by the designer of Rayquaza or the company which owns the Pokemon franchise. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:18, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying this and also for taking a closer look at the other file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Stand for Courage Page Deletion

Hello RHaworth! You recently deleted the Stand For Courage Organization page due to A7. The organization has substantial media coverage as well as an upcoming film with nationwide release, so I believe it can meet the notability requirement. Can you provide me with some advice for reworking the artilcle? (I also know the article had major formatting issues, so this time I plan to start the new article in my sandbox. I didn't mean to start in the mainspace. I'm a bit rusty...) Thanks for your time! Queequeg22 (talk) 19:03, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Abandoned draft: Michael R. Jackson

Hello, I'm trying to create my first article about Michael R. Jackson, a playwright and composer based in NYC. Misplaced Pages is suggesting I contact you because I'm unsure if I am re-creating a page you previously deleted. Here is the link that tells me you did the deletion Draft:Michael R. Jackson. Thanks in advance for any information you can give me about this article —Katyein (talk) 19:50, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Regarding deleted page of Rojin Shakya

Dear Sir, I don’t know the reason why you deleted the page that i created under the name of rojin shakya i could have made modification if there was any mistakes. Since you are not from my area you may not know him. Please send me the copy of text. Or else enable a option for me to do the modification. His name has been mentioned in[REDACTED] several times. Thank you looking forward — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shakyarojin (talk • contribs) 04:34, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

deleted article

my name is nilkanth gaikwad. i want to know about deleted article please send me the text of deleted article i dont know what was the problem in my article please send me that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nilkanth Gaikwad (talk • contribs) 12:32, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Hii this nilkanth gaikwad I dont know why my content has been deleted so please provide my content if you thing it was not fulfilling the criteria for Misplaced Pages guideline i will not put it again just i want my article. please provide my content — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nilkanth Gaikwad (talk • contribs) 05:38, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

  • I get very annoyed when people ignore me. I told you to read this. To show that you did so please tell me what are the last four words of the message to which my read this link points. Since you are unlikely to become a Misplaced Pages editor, I do not demand that you comply with the instructions but I would still like to know that you read the message. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

WP:REFUND

Hey RH, can you please refund Portal:University of Wisconsin–Madison and Portal:University of Nebraska–Lincoln? The MfD actually closed with keeping both of those. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:05, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of CerberusOS Wiki article

I had add CerberusOS that is Custom ROM & I provided information for the project like other Custom ROM have for example Aospa , lineageOS, Viper OS etc . I would like you to reconsidered about the article we wasn't advertising any thing just provided information for our project. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShantanuSingh555 (talk • contribs) 16:17, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Still photography for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Still photography is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Still photography until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qono (talk) 17:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Useras/Les Useres

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Useras/Les Useres. Since you had some involvement with the Useras/Les Useres redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:40, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Deleted Draft:List of Ace of Diamond chapters

Hi! I was the one who created Draft:List of Ace of Diamond chapters, which was deleted by you shortly after I submitted it for review. I just want to ask why it has been deleted. Is the issue the summaries included in the page? If so, I got those summaries from Kodansha USA's page for the series and not from Amazon. I would just like to understand why it was deleted for copyright infringement. It was not my intention to do so. Hope you can elaborate on this to me so I can keep the reason in mind before redoing the draft and sending it again for review. Thank you very much! Perseushunt (talk) 22:43, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the response! May I know if it would still be a violation if I cite where I got the summary from? Thanks! Perseushunt (talk) 21:58, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Deleted:Doubles curling

Hi, you just deleted Doubles curling even though there was no copyright infringement and I pointed this out on the talk page. This is the website that the supposed copyrighted text came from: . If you look it says towards the bottom of the page, "Here is a simplified version at Misplaced Pages:" and then links to the Mixed curling article that Doubles curling was split from. Right below that line is the text that the Doubles curling article had that matched the website and was supposedly copyright infringement. How is this copyright infringement when they got the text from[REDACTED] and even cited the originating article? The article shouldn't have been deleted anyway since the alleged copyright infringing text was only a portion of the article and Misplaced Pages:CSD#G12 says "where there is no non-infringing content on the page worth saving". Why was the article deleted? - A202985 (talk) 22:12, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Fight the New Drug

Excuse me? I've never seen the deleted version of the article, so an article I wrote from scratch cannot be a repost of deleted content. This does not qualify under G4 speedy deletion. — feminist (talk) 09:33, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Fight the New Drug. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — feminist (talk) 13:38, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

  • I stick to the world of unambiguous keep/delete decisions. As soon as I see 8k bytes of discussion start up, I bow out and let others fight over it. I have given the nearly headless admin carte blanche. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Disappearance of Brittanee Drexel

Just to let you know I'm recreating this page—deleted after an AfD eight years ago, and then deleted again by you in 2013 after a recreation. Not only is there more coverage in reliable sources, there have been continuing developments in the story with news coverage as recently as two months ago. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:21, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Charlotte Townsend-Gault

Hi RHaworth, thanks for catching my errors. I am a new editor. I want to re-write the article, without the block quotations, and list of publications, as it appears that I was trying to work with something beyond my editing skill level. I see that I need some sort of permission to do so? Would you be able to advise how I seek that permission? Thanks. FourtyToo (talk) 19:36, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Emotional Speech Blocks Deletion Syndrome

Deletion of Jhett Black Edition

Hello, I see you've deleted a page that I had contested the deletion request on. Once there was a keep request, the page needs to go through review. It's clear that the the reason I gave against the deletion on the article's talk page was completely ignored. The album charted on the official Japanese music chart Oricon, which is enough for an article to have a page. — Xenobia4 (talk) 02:45, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Jhett Black Edition. I listed the article in the section heading. — Xenobia4 (talk) 00:10, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. I want to start on a page on the artist, but finding complete information on the Jhett himself has proved difficult, whereas he was only an official artist for a year under the Avex label before returning as a underground artist. His official singles and album releases are easy enough to locate, however. I would love for someone with more experience in tracking down information on smaller artists, if you can recommend a fellow contributor. — Xenobia4 (talk) 22:59, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Will do. Thank you so much! Xenobia4 (talk) 03:54, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Hello, I am working for over four days on the hybrid blockchain draft that just got speedy deleted. I am researching different types of hybrid blockchains and have put that information about Polkadot there so I can continue writing on it in my own words. That entire article is being written by myself, except that little piece about Polkadot because I am not finished yet. This is very complex material and it takes a lot of time to make sure everything is accurate. I apologize for this mistake from my part, I was not aware I am in conflict while still working in draft. I do not understand why the entire draft got deleted instead of just that little part of a long piece of work. Please allow me to continue working on that draft. And I will not make the same mistake again. — JeffreyDutch (talk) 10:18, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you so much, I appreciate this a lot. Is it possible the draft gets restored so I can make the changes and continue working on it? Or do I need to start from the beginning again? Thank you. JeffreyDutch (talk) 09:46, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for overlooking. I've made the changes to my profile. And would be grateful if you can find time to email me the hybrid blockchain draft. — JeffreyDutch (talk) 13:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Well, at least I was able to amuse you for once, unlike many others on this page. To be honest I am really tired now and my only other try currently would be to do this before I try again tomorrow: hybrid blockchain Wait, do I increase my chances if I try both options? hybrid blockchain Wait, that last edit is the correct one. My final answer. Overlook my error again if I amused you. — JeffreyDutch (talk) 19:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you very much for sending me the email with the draft. Now I will certainly sleep well and more educated. — JeffreyDutch (talk) 19:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

deletion of John Edmonds (artist)

Hi RHaworth, I see you speedily deleted the page for John Edmonds (artist). I was unable to challenge the speedy deletion. I ran it through earwig copy vio and did not have an issue as it was under 50% from what I can remember. Since the page was speedily deleted, I was unable to confirm the copyright issues or lack there of. Is there a way for you to restore the page and for me to continue to work on the page to mitigate the copyvio issues you saw in it? Thank you, -- Wil540 art (talk) 23:06, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Why did u delete my page?

Why did u delete what i put?did i do something wrong? If so let me know and explain what i can do to fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:3051:1BD0:BD14:9E60:CC70:59B7 (talk) 02:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Deleted page: Sheila Nortley

Hi, I recently created a page which was deleted due to copyrighted content. Please could you kindly provide the information used so that I can re-create the page and ammend the copyrighted text? I don't have access to the link of the article since it was deleted. Thanks very much. Kind regards, Hannah — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannahbanner89 (talk • contribs) 23:30, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of page Umberto Malesci

Hello RHaworth, you deleted the page Umberto Malesci without placing it on Speedy Deletion Wiki. Your assessment on notability is inaccurate. The page had references from the major Italian newspaper that published articles about me, my achievements, and my ventures. "Corriere della Sera" and "Sole 24 Ore" are the most reputable newspapers in Italy. They would correspond, respectively, to the NY Times and WSJ in the US. Doing a google news search with "Umberto Malesci" would provide you significant news coverage about who I am and what I've done:

Below a few relevant articles for your review: , . Moreover, there is significant coverage in the US as well including Forbes that cites me as a leading expert in his field: , and . I am a recipient of the Milan Chamber of Commerce award as "entrepreneur of the year" for the City of Milan in 2011: .

I'd appreciate if you can recreate the page and, if you still are uncertain about notability for my page, start a Misplaced Pages discussion involving other editors who are familiar with my field and with the reputation of newspapers like "Sole 24 Ore" and "Corriere delle Sera". Best regards, Umberto Malesci — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.173.95.181 (talk) 01:43, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

It was at speedydeletion.wikia.com, but was taken down recently. Here is the Twitter feed. — Ritchie333 22:16, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Deleted Page - Ha Li Fa Pte Ltd

Hi RHaworth, I'm the creator of Ha Li Fa Pte Ltd, and I create the article cautious with Misplaced Pages Guidelines on an organisation. I want to learn more from you on which part of the article falls on advertising & promotion. All sources are from independent third parties and popular news portal. Besides, I also refer few F&B companies on Misplaced Pages (no warning tags)for references. Hence, I would like to request you to send a copy of the article to my email (I already enable others to send me an email from Preference) or restore the article to my username/sandbox. Thank you Williams Yee 08:07, 15 April 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Williamsyee (talk • contribs)

Ah, sorry my mistake. Here is the link Ha Li Fa Pte Ltd. — Williams Yee 11:42, 15 April 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Williamsyee (talk • contribs)

Deleted draft for Michalis Tiverios

You had deleted my draft for Michalis Tiverios and after my request here you have kindly sent the deleted draft back via e-mail. I would be grateful if you could check the new draft Michalis Tiverios in order to see if there is any problem with its content. -- Dimiterzop (talk) 09:56, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Janice Griffith

Janice Griffith was deleted despite the verdict at the most recent discussion here. Can you please {{ping}} me and let me know why this was deleted without a more recent XFD, contrary to that discussion? I created a redirect to Cane Hill (band) from that term. The redirect is a different type of entry than the article. -- Jax 0677 (talk) 13:21, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi RHaworth. Jax 0677's message above is misleading at best. In the RfD, he voted to "keep" and wrote, "If the article can be created, then it should be created." So I withdrew the nomination and turned the redirect into a stub, leading to the G4 deletion. That's fine; I wasn't aware of the prior AfD. However, the consensus of that AfD wasn't to "redirect" but to "delete." If this subject is not notable, the page should be "salted," not redirected.
I opened the RfD in the first place due to BLP concerns. If the subject is a non-notable living person, her name should not be redirected to a section about her being a victim of domestic violence, cited to a blog post. I think that this is callous and contrary to BLP. What do you think? — 24.185.5.61 (talk) 18:31, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
I raised the issue at WP:BLP/N#Janice Griffith. — 24.185.5.61 (talk) 03:07, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Helen Engle

Hello, I was working on the creation of a page for conservationist Helen Engle, which was deleted: https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Helen_Engle I cited all information used from all sources, fairly aggressively. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to avoid perceived copyright infringement on this text. Best, Hoppelt111 (talk) 18:12, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

I did include the link and I have the original content. I can remove the phrase 'award winning' from the intro. Is there any other reason why this page was deleted? Hoppelt111 (talk) 20:40, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Hoppelt111: The problem was that your biography was copied directly from another website, which we can't allow for legal reasons. I have restored your draft to a basic stub; I'll ping Megalibrarygirl who is a highly experienced editor in improving biographies of women to see if she can help. — Ritchie333 15:09, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Undelete Request Highway Runoff database

Dear Mr. Haworth, Thank you for your rigorous protection of Misplaced Pages and your prompt attention to my article on the Highway Runoff Database (HRDB). I annotated the top of the page with the note: "<!-- NOTE: The highway runoff database and the associated reports are works of the United States government and, therefore, are not subject to copyright restrictions. This page should not be rejected/deleted due to text copied from such publications -->" At the bottom, I added the code {{USGS}}. The Misplaced Pages page I created has extensive links to the published source documents; all of which are in the public domain. Finally, I am the primary author of the HRDB and many of the reports that include the HRDB. The HRDB is free to the public, but because it is a government publication, is not publicized. Over the decade since it was first published I have noticed many cases where tax payer money was wasted because government researchers and university students have recreated efforts to assemble information available in the HRDB. I am a civil servant and so have nothing to gain from publication on Misplaced Pages.

Extended content
In several comments on your talk page, you suggest that people wait until the subject of a page garners outside attention; that is a valid observation. The HRDB has been included in two published and one draft (soon to be published) reports by the U.S. National Academies of Science Engineering and Medicine

Barrett, Michael, L.E. Katz, Scott Taylor, J.J Sansalone, and Marty Stevenson, 2014,Measuring and Removing Dissolved Metals from Stormwater in Highly Urbanized Areas. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014. NCHRP Report 767: https://doi.org/10.17226/22389

Taylor, Scott, Michael Barrett, Marc Leisenring, Sheila Sahu, Daniel Pankani, Aaron Poresky, Adam Questad, Eric Strecker, Neil Weinstein, and Marie Venner. 2016, Long-term performance and life-cycle costs of stormwater best management practices. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., NCHRP Report 792 https://dx.doi.org/10.17226/22275

It also has been cited by these journal articles/reports

C Ernst, L Katz, M Barrett, 2016, Removal of dissolved copper and zinc from highway runoff via adsorption: Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment Volume 2 Issue 1 https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/JSWBAY.0000803

Michael Barrett, Lynn Katz, Scott Taylor 2014, Removal of Dissolved Heavy Metals in Highway Runoff: Transportation Research Record Volume: 2436 issue: 1, page(s): 131-138 https://doi.org/10.3141/2436-13

and the report Wagner, C.R., Fitzgerald, S.A., Sherrell, R.D., Harned, D.A., Staub, E.L., Pointer, B.H., and Wehmeyer, L.L., 2011, Characterization of stormwater runoff from bridges in North Carolina and the effects of bridge deck runoff on receiving streams: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5180, 95 p. + 8 appendix tables, available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2011/5180/.

The HRDB also has been cited in several USGS reports, journal articles, and conference papers that I was an author or coauthor on.

However, these articles and reports cite a older versions of the database; people may not be able to find newer versions. Misplaced Pages can help people find the latest versions. Also, once the HRDB page is created, this Misplaced Pages page can be used on other Misplaced Pages pages that discuss stormwater management, nonpoint source pollution, and related topics. In this way students and scientists will more readily find the HRDB and the actual data about the quality of highway runoff. The also will be able to find other original sources cited by the HRDB Misplaced Pages page.

I spent about 4 hours boiling down information from other sources and reorganizing and rewriting my previous writings on the HRDB and creating the images used on the page. I'd be grateful for feedback on how to improve the work, but nuking someone's work wholesale without discussion or the chance for feedback seems a bit drastic. At the least please send me my work so it is not completely lost. Thank you, GEGranato GEGranato (talk) 19:30, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

The Isis Thesis

Good day, RHaworth, Link to page you deleted: . On April 13, 2019, you deleted the draft Isis Thesis page due to a G12 error:

•(Deletion log); 18:39 RHaworth talk contribs deleted page Draft:The Isis Thesis ‎(G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of https://edoc.site/birth-of-the-limitless-ancient-egypt-pdf-free.html, https://www.bokus.com/bok/9780976281405/the-isis-thesis/, https://www.bookdepository.com/Isis-Thesis-Judy-Kay-King/9780976281405)

I understand why you did that. Good call. However, I am the author of that paper, and their publication is fine with me. I was wondering if you could reinstate the deleted page if I remove that so-called G12 source citation. If not, could you tell me what you did not like in the article itself. I will add your comments to the Criticism section, if you choose. If you do not want to reinstate the page, I would appreciate a copy of the page. It's fine to email me, and I have noted that in preferences. — Judy King Dellavon88 (talk) 21:07, 15 April 2019 (UTC)Dellavon88

(tpw) Draft:The Isis Thesis appears to be the link. — CoolSkittle (talk) 21:43, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

You Deleted My Page

Hi, Why did you delete my page, it did not advertise anything you just have nothing better to do with your time. If you are unhappy with my page please delete the bits that are advertisements and leave it up — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:C3A:CBB:BC6F:A050:5B66:97 (talk) 09:04, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) You didn't specify the page name. This IP has no messages. Your only edit on this IP is the post to this page. Without any of that information, it's physically impossible to restore anything. — Ritchie333 14:59, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of Draft:Labels of Primary Potency

G'day, my students were working on this for a project, and it was not yet finished. Please email it to me and I will make sure it does not infringe copyright before it goes up again. — Francis Bond (talk) 13:36, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. I have gone over the page, and I do not think it is a copyright violation. Quotes from the book are in quotation marks and cited, and there is a lot of material not from the book. Unless you can point out something concrete you have a problem with, I will put it back up some time next week. — Francis Bond (talk) 00:09, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Page deletion

Why was the page https://en.wikipedia.org/UCL_Juggling_and_Circus_Society deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by I m Jojo (talk • contribs) 13:46, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Prose such as "Our story is quite old and as they say, old is gold. "Learn a skill that will last you for life. Impress your friends and family. Join a society with a rude name". If you are into all these, you will enjoy it deeply." is completely unacceptable for a neutral, general purpose encyclopedia. Since the page provided no value for serious editors, it was deleted. — Ritchie333 14:56, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Sealy Australia Deletion

Good day, Sir! You have deleted our previous draft of as mentioned here , understandably so as we have not provided any copyleft notice beforehand—apologies for that! So, we would like to request you to please give us access to the previously written article again as Sealy AU is keen to send a copyleft notice and needs the URL of the page/file.

Of course, if there's anything else you need from our end, or if I'm going about this the wrong way (I'm a Wiki newbie, after all), please let me know! I'm determined to do everything I can to get this article up to par with Misplaced Pages standards. Thanks and have a great week ahead! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adelaromnila (talk • contribs) 03:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Deletion - Eugene Lee Yang

Hi, apologies. I was cleaning up my subpages because I didn't previously know how to move drafts to the mainspace -- rookie mistake. What I did before was to create a draft, and then submit another draft to be published instead of clicking "More" and "Move" to mainspace. I might've accidentally added speedy deletion tag on Eugene Lee Yang instead of my personal subpage. Is there a way that this can be reverted? — Verbosmithie (talk) 09:16, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

maurya news deletion

You have deleted the my[REDACTED] page the name of maurya news, so i have no idea for how be it but i give all information is correct and genuine, so that kindly request you please allow and restore my[REDACTED] page or suggest me how can do this. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manish techguru (talk • contribs) 11:21, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Afd Delete or Keep?

Hi, RHawort. Did you mean to close this discussion as a delete or keep: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/MyTicket.co.uk? — Ceethekreator (talk) 11:40, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Jeff Oster

Jeff Oster Deletion - Why I'm not certain why this page was deleted. It was approved and stood for a some time. The only recent change was the addition of his nomination to the IMA awards, others of which were already mentioned in the page. The page is not promotional. He has done significant work (which is why it was approved). Please tell me how this page violated part of the Misplaced Pages rules? Thank you. Meta in MA -- Meta in MA (talk) 12:00, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

I would like to point out that this page was completely rewritten and anything that smocked of being promotional was removed (that promotional content was unintentional: it is just my natural writing style. I have no COI). It was absolutely not a cut and paste of a previously deleted page. I worked with two editors to clean up the work: they have since left Misplaced Pages.

I'm getting really disappointed with trying to submit work to Misplaced Pages. I'm trying to follow the rules and better document New Age artists, and once I get an article edited to the point where it is approved, it gets deleted.

Does Misplaced Pages what to suppress new authors?

Please, I ask you to reconsider and look at the substantial improvements I made and the fact there is absolutely nothing promotional and no COI here. Please undelete my article.

Thank you

--Meta in MA (talk) 12:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)


Deletion of PassportCard

Well, I must say I am quite disappointed in this swift deletion of an article without giving anyone a chance to respond. I am a long time editor and I have created dozens of articles. Nobody has treated my articles with such utter disrespect. It was not promotional in the least. It was an article about a solid company, with many solid sources to back it up. There is so much crap on here, and nobody does anything for years and years, but an article I sweated over is deleted with one button click? No wonder nobody wants to edit Misplaced Pages anymore. For shame. Please restore the article and explain where exactly the "advertising" is.--Geewhiz (talk) 19:57, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

OS coordinates down

Hi Roger; if I click a link for an OS grid ref it throws a HTTP 503 error; for example, at Toton TMD in the infobox the OS grid link SK484355 returns "No webservice The URI you have requested, /os/coor_g/?pagename=Toton_TMD&params=SK484355_region%3AGB_scale%3A25000, is not currently serviced." --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:20, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of Draft:Wales Centre for Public Policy

Hi, I'd like to request the undeletion of the Draft:Wales Centre for Public Policy. You have stated (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.wcpp.org.uk/about/work-streams/) as the reason, which I'm confused by as I work for the centre (as I've disclosed on my user page) and we own the content on our website. I actually wrote what you believe we've plagiarized! Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RossNJ19 (talk • contribs) 07:52, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

(tpw) RossNJ19 - It doesn't matter whether you own the content. This page says we can't copy it. Release the content under a suitable Creative Commons license or in the public domain if you want to copy it to Misplaced Pages. Also please sign your posts on talk pages using 4 tildes (~~~~). CoolSkittle (talk) 11:25, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Can you please email me the content and I'll make changes to ensure we can use it without having to make changes to our T&Cs. Thanks. --RossNJ19 (talk) 11:40, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

G11 and a lack of content

I went for G11 on Antriksh Rathi Architects because the username was clearly related, it was obviously the name of a business, and had no content – therefore nothing to suggest it wasn't spam. However, your deletion comment gave me pause for thought that it might not have been the best tag. Any suggestions on the off chance I come across something like this in future? Triptothecottage (talk) 11:52, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

User talk:RHaworth/2019 Apr 27 Add topic