Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 67.168.54.58 (talk) at 00:37, 24 March 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:WPF navigation

• /Archive1
• /Archive2

Hi my name is carebear

Juventus F.C.

Has it won as it meet its target and it has the most votes --Kingjamie 17:19, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

So far today neither I nor Aabha have been around to update it, but I'll update it now.

Anyone can update it when a new article is to be selected (each Sunday), To select a new AID the following articles need to be updated:

• Template:Collab-soccer
• Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Football/Article improvement drive/History
• Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Football/Article improvement drive
• Template:FootballAID
• Template:FAIDuser (which should be posted on the user talk page of those who voted in the past week, plus those who voted for the winner)

and Template:FootballAID should be removed from the old collaboration and put on the new one. Oldelpaso 21:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

That should read Template:FootballIDRIVECurrent, not Template:FootballAID. Oldelpaso 14:45, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

I've now transcluded the current colloboration onto Template:FAIDuser, if it works properly it shouldn't need manual updating anymore. Oldelpaso 16:41, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

It doesn't work, the subst'ed template changes. Back to manual updates. Oldelpaso 13:23, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

I think I've fixed it, using <includeonly> and <noinclude>. Hope that helps. – Elisson • T • C • 13:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Or no... – Elisson • T • C • 13:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

I believe I've fixed it now. – Elisson • T • C • 13:39, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Oldelpaso 13:50, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Just to clarify

If a nomination doesn't get 3 votes in a week, is it deleted from the list? The Bayern Munich Junior/women have been there two days after they needed the three votes, so should I just delete them? Kingfisherswift 10:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Nominations which do not get the required number of votes should be moved to Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Football/Article improvement drive/Removed Oldelpaso 11:06, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Cool, cheers. Kingfisherswift 13:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Opt-out list

There's a few people for whom I post Template:FAIDuser on their talk page pretty much every week. I guess in these cases they already know about the AID and don't need reminding. So, if you do not wish to have

Dunga has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

appearing on your talk page when a new AID is selected, put your name here. Oldelpaso 12:14, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Biography

Let us know if you happen to pick an article on a person and we'll alert our members! plange 05:50, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

An inter-project collaboration is a great idea, plange. Ta.  Slumgum T. C.   20:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Change to fortnightly?

There has been a general decline in the number of editors working on the current AID each week, and I don't think it is attracting enough attention to justify making a new selection each week. Currently we only have two nominations, of which the leader has only 2 votes, and the current selection has only been worked on by 3 editors thus far. Perhaps the selection should be made fortnightly rather than weekly, thoughts? Oldelpaso 16:17, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Should give it a couple of weeks to see if the drought continues, or it could cause some bother if there are a lot of nominations with a fortnightly cleanup. That or all the football articles are now perfect ;). Archibald99 01:23, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Selection quandary

On the face of it Tobias Linderoth is due to be selected, but User:Dk-fck's only contribution is to make that vote, which strikes me as weird. Removing that vote would result in Tottenham Hotspur F.C. being selected. Oldelpaso 10:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

I figured I'd solve the situation by voting for one of the articles myself. Spurs are likely to be a topic of interest to more editors than Linderoth (biographies tend to attract less attention when selected than clubs, unless its someone iconic like Pele), so I voted for Spurs. Oldelpaso 10:45, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Football Stadiums

I've seen quite a few football stadium articles and there isn't much in them. If there are any articles to focus on, it's the stadium articles. Kingjeff 11:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Number of votes needed

Just curious: the articles on Volkswagen Arena, Weserstadion, Åge Hareide, and Michel Platini were nominated on the same week. On their second week, the former three need at least 2 more votes, but the latter, which was nominated after the former three, needs 3 more. Why is this? T.I.A. --ChaChaFut 02:49, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

The date is extended by a week for every 3 votes. When Platini got three votes the date was extended, so it will be up for two weeks, whereas the others will be removed after a week if they do not get more votes, note the dates. There's probably a far clearer explanation somwhere else, try the archive. Oldelpaso 19:22, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Stadium articles

It's a shame that the stadium articles I've nominated didn't get enough votes since those are the soccer articles that really need a lot of work on. Kingjeff 19:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Old supported artcles

Can people please add this ({{FootballIDRIVEpast}}) to the talk pages of old articles supported by the FootballDRIVE as it tells users which articles have been supported by the FootballDRIVE. Kingjamie 18:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)