This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MONGO (talk | contribs) at 21:51, 30 March 2007 (→Rosie Odonnel, conspiracy theory: see). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:51, 30 March 2007 by MONGO (talk | contribs) (→Rosie Odonnel, conspiracy theory: see)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)RfA thanks
Thank you for your Support on my recent nomination for adminship, which passed with a final tally of 89/1/1. If there's anything I can help with, then you know where to find me. Cheers. - Michael Billington (talk) 12:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC) |
Rosie Odonnel, conspiracy theory
Hi, I reverted you here due to BLP concerns. You can't put anything negative into an article without sourcing it properly in the article. Also raised the concern on the article talk page. Thanks! - Denny 21:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- She said it...it will be more readily available in day or two. Fox news was all over this latest moronic comment last night. I'm looking for asource now, and when I find it, the category will stay until she recants.--MONGO 21:51, 30 March 2007 (UTC)