This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BeanieFan11 (talk | contribs) at 23:23, 17 May 2024 (k). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:23, 17 May 2024 by BeanieFan11 (talk | contribs) (k)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)FC Armătura Zalău
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- FC Armătura Zalău (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Despite a large addition, it remains mainly unsourced. Existing sources do not provide WP:SIGCOV, so fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Football, and Romania. UtherSRG (talk) 10:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - the club played in Liga II AdrianCioran 13:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- WP:NTEAM cares not about what ivision th team played in. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I am on the fence on this article too. I would like to see more sources, is there no Romania wiki page for this club? Govvy (talk) 17:03, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. The situation is a bit sad. The club is 100% notable, but User:AdrianCioran can't help but engage in move-warring, and doesn't understand basic Misplaced Pages policies or the deletion process. Look at the article history: User:Florin1977 tried to keep it in draft space with the edit summary "do not publish yet". AdrianCioran edited disruptively. Geschichte (talk) 20:23, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed. I'd accept draftify as WP:ATD and that would be community consensus that would enable limited, but escalating, blocks on Adrian. - UtherSRG (talk) 01:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- I support such action. Weak understanding of how Misplaced Pages works and hardly any communication - I'm noting a message written in Romanian on his talk page half a year ago, which translates to: "Don't create pages if you don't know how, because the moderators will delete them". Geschichte (talk) 09:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed. I'd accept draftify as WP:ATD and that would be community consensus that would enable limited, but escalating, blocks on Adrian. - UtherSRG (talk) 01:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep – Same situation than Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/CS Auxerre Lugoj. Svartner (talk) 00:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Drafify - as above, not currently notable, but might be in future. GiantSnowman 18:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly notable even though their successful period was pre-internet, can even find recent articles such as . SportingFlyer T·C 05:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Draftify: A pretty significant football club with some sourcing and notability, but I'd like to see something better than that with more reliable sourcing. HarukaAmaranth 香 13:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- We shouldn't be in the habit of draftifying notable articles even if the sourcing isn't great. This already has six sources. SportingFlyer T·C 16:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shadow311 (talk) 14:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep/Draftify: Notable, even though sources may not be readily available online.Anonimu (talk) 16:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Virtually certain to be notable. There appear to be nearly 10,000 results on newspaper archive Arcanum. BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)