This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CryptoDerk (talk | contribs) at 03:31, 30 May 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:31, 30 May 2005 by CryptoDerk (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)On the list: WP:POINT, WP:NPA, WP:Civility, Good_faith, Wikilove, et cetera, etc.
RickK is my new hero!
You're welcome. Thank you for the thank you. :) RickK 23:58, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
- Section self-titled!
El_C 00:15, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
The only thing I can think of to do is to report it on WP:ANI and get other people's comments, or file an RfC on him. He's a troll, and has been from day one. I find it hilarious that he gets upset whenever anybody calls him Jack on Misplaced Pages, yet that's how he signs his mailings to the mail list. RickK 22:14, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
- I placed a notice here. Please speak out against is harrasment of myself, Rick. Thank you. El_C 22:20, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
Spadomasochism
I'll contemplate a repsonse on the WP: page shortly, but for now, let me observe that I simply do not understand why Misplaced Pages tolerates disruptive behaviour of this kind. I have no wish to alter the fundamental character of openness and inclusivity, but soon as a user demonstates they can't conform to agreed upon principles of behaviour, they should be banned. Why is that so controversial? Is this an encyclopedia project or some kind of sheltered workplace for disturbed individuals? -- Viajero | Talk 23:22, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
- I certainly will comment! As soon as I'm awake. (It's 3:50 AM on Sunday morning here right now. :-( ) Kim Bruning is my hero for this edit. Bishonen | talk 01:50, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
A picture that is, unfortunately, too apt
I am livid with rage. That Sam would attempt to do such a thing is not only a mockery of everything Misplaced Pages stands for — it is an open-faced attack on the democracy of the project. If you are such a terrible user, why were you just made an admin by an overwhelming majority? This is absurd. I'm thinking the mere presence of that list demands action. Wally 03:04, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
- I am, by the way, prepared to immediately report him to the AMA Coordinator for bad conduct, if you'll allow. Wally 03:05, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
Changed my mind
Yeah, I changed my mind about sleeping first and commenting at WP:AN/I afterwards, I got too mad at the people writing in to say we need to forget the whole thing now that Sam has been nice enough to change his sig back. I've commented now. Please don't leave the project, El, we need people like you. It's OK, you don't have to marry me! Bishonen | talk 03:39, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
Don't worry about it
It's more evidence against him than against you. It won't have any impact on your ability to work here, it's just an intimidation tactic. Jayjg 05:14, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
Some light in the darkness
Please see: this. I've only just finished it, and I need help adding some people to get the ball rolling. Your most competent and good-spirited help would be appreciated. Cheers, --Silversmith Hewwo 13:42, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
Well, I'm back–sooner than I expected, but I couldn't ignore being mentioned in an arbcom case (of all things). This business with Spade is shameful, and you have my full support. Best, and thanks for the kind note earlier (with kitty!). Mackensen (talk) 17:13, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
Not allowed to block yourself
Blocking yourself is not allowed according to policy. CryptoDerk 03:31, May 30, 2005 (UTC)