This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hiding (talk | contribs) at 12:26, 14 January 2008 (→Aku Soku Zan: c). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:26, 14 January 2008 by Hiding (talk | contribs) (→Aku Soku Zan: c)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Aku Soku Zan
I don't get the point of this article. It talks about the concept but provides no sources (other than the cultural references trivia) and no literature that discusses this. It seems to be Misplaced Pages:Original research. WhisperToMe (talk) 22:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- It's not original research, but I don't really think it's notable enough for its own article. Joe routt (talk) 22:26, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - the content is questionable, and it's too minour to warrant a page. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:30, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 00:41, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- 'K this is a pretty darned obvious merge per the guidelines of WP:FICT into Saitō Hajime (Rurouni Kenshin). Has not, that I can tell, acheived independent notablity, but does demostrate that the character has, in its way. Most of the first section already is duplication so doesn't need to go, while the cultural references belongs in the Character reception. This was a suimmary style split from the character that was never warrented. —Quasirandom (talk) 01:09, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete It is a very bad plot summery combined with original research and some trivia thrown in for added measure (I'm guessing so that it wouldn't fail WP:PLOT completely even though it doesn't work). --Farix (Talk) 01:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Fairly unnecessary & described more succinctly on the character's own page. Merge the relevant bits and a-go. Papacha (talk) 05:08, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- Hiding T 12:19, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, it's not worth merging, it is after all, a phrase. Hiding T 12:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC)