Misplaced Pages

Template:RFChist list

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RFC bot (talk | contribs) at 02:25, 5 September 2008 (Update, 11 current discussions). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:25, 5 September 2008 by RFC bot (talk | contribs) (Update, 11 current discussions)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:

  • Talk:Sikh Rajputs This section of the article has failed to provide citations for the stated references, regarding an alleged tribal communal practice. Editors have now engaged in an editorial debate over the matter, however an external range of comments are sought to try and resolve the issue. Perhaps extrenal advice may help resolve the issue. It is an interesting topic of a peoples, but I feel that some poorly written/POV language may be marring the integrity of the subject into a propoganda slant. Comments please....
  • Talk:Native Americans in the United States To find a unbiased solution on which Native American images to keep, to include or not to include names with images, and the number of images needed for such a diversified ethnic group.
  • Talk:Sejny Uprising Does a long, non-neutral quote belong to this article?
  • Talk:Rwanda Should over half the demographics section dicuss Islam, a small group in Rwanda (see subsection). Also, issues pertaining to wp:burden remain ongoing.
  • Talk:Line of succession to the British throne Is this article mostly original research, and does it violate several other guidelines?
  • Talk:Bayt Jibrin To find a solution on whether or not using "Beit Guvrin" as Bayt Jibrin's original Aramaic name in the article.
  • Talk:Negroid image may reflect out of date or racist science
  • Talk:Pearl Harbor advance-knowledge debate Is this article too long and should it follow a "For vs. Against" outline for clarity?


Requests for comment (All)
Articles (All)
Non-articles (All)
InstructionsTo add a discussion to this list:
  • Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.
For more information, see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment. Report problems to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment. Lists are updated every hour by Legobot.

For more information, see User:RFC bot

Template:RFChist list Add topic