User talk:Ejnogarb - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ejnogarb (talk | contribs) at 02:01, 2 April 2009 (→Blocked 24 hours). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:01, 2 April 2009 by Ejnogarb (talk | contribs) (→Blocked 24 hours)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Also note that this is not a forum for discussing any topic generally. Instead, alert me to the appropriate talk page and I will respond there. As a general rule, I typically delete any messages or warnings that are either old or unimportant. Please don't send me welcome templates, either, because I've already been welcomed. EJNOGARB

Talk page guidelines

Please respect etiquette and assume good faith. Also, refrain from making personal attacks and remain civil.

Obama

I have an outline of a lengthy and legitimate article at User:THF/Obama with not a single "nutball conspiracy theory" in it. I'll draft it off-wiki this weekend. I encourage editors to participate in this project by sending me sources (or perhaps fully drafted paragraphs) rather than battling at DRV or on the Talk:Obama page about intermediate stages. If we present a fully-sourced, well-written neutral article, there shouldn't be a problem -- and if there is, it will be pretty damning of Misplaced Pages. THF (talk) 15:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Notice

I have brought up your editing at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Agenda/POV pushing. Feel free to weigh in. - ✰ALLST☆R✰ 03:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Email

Can you enable your email? CENSEI (talk) 01:23, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry

The whole issue was a miss understanding, my mistake, by the way that was not a welcome, it was a warning, but a wrong one, thank you for removing it :-) sorry again Maen. K. A. (talk) 16:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Blocked 24 hours

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 day in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for You are engaged in an edit war at the article Promiscuity. When this block expires, please use the talk page instead of editing the article again.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Jayron32.talk.contribs 01:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Ejnogarb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry for edit warring on the promiscuity page, and acknowledge that I let myself get out of hand in reverting edits. This won't happen again because I'm committed to following a one revert rule, where if someone reverts one of my reverts, I'll back off and use the talk page until a consensus can be reached. As for the article in question, I'm going to leave it alone for a while, and afterwards I won't be making any edits to it until I can reach a consensus with other editors.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I'm sorry for edit warring on the promiscuity page, and acknowledge that I let myself get out of hand in reverting edits. This won't happen again because I'm committed to following a one revert rule, where if someone reverts one of my reverts, I'll back off and use the talk page until a consensus can be reached. As for the article in question, I'm going to leave it alone for a while, and afterwards I won't be making any edits to it until I can reach a consensus with other editors. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I'm sorry for edit warring on the promiscuity page, and acknowledge that I let myself get out of hand in reverting edits. This won't happen again because I'm committed to following a one revert rule, where if someone reverts one of my reverts, I'll back off and use the talk page until a consensus can be reached. As for the article in question, I'm going to leave it alone for a while, and afterwards I won't be making any edits to it until I can reach a consensus with other editors. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I'm sorry for edit warring on the promiscuity page, and acknowledge that I let myself get out of hand in reverting edits. This won't happen again because I'm committed to following a one revert rule, where if someone reverts one of my reverts, I'll back off and use the talk page until a consensus can be reached. As for the article in question, I'm going to leave it alone for a while, and afterwards I won't be making any edits to it until I can reach a consensus with other editors. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

EJNOGARB 02:01, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Category:

Requests for unblock