This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) at 23:38, 24 July 2011 (Relisting debate). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:38, 24 July 2011 by Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) (Relisting debate)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Solas nua
- Solas nua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet the GNG. Also significant conflict of interest with creator listed as "social media manager" on given external link - the tone is bad. Raymie (t • c) 06:32, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I have given the article a serious going-over and removed 90% of the puffery that was there, together with adding links and corrections. What is left is brief but I would consider this an established and notable arts organisation - there are quite a number of hits on an internet search. asnac (talk) 08:21, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Significant coverage in WaPo, productions reviewed in NYT, won DC Mayor's Arts Award 86.44.35.99 (talk) 23:21, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Added links to profiles by The Irish Times & NPR 86.44.35.99 (talk) 23:31, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- IP editor is new and has only contributed to the article and this debate. Raymie (t • c) 04:22, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:38, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Categories: