This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) at 06:01, 26 February 2012 (Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Willietell/Archives/2012 1. (BOT)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:01, 26 February 2012 by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Willietell/Archives/2012 1. (BOT))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
RfC: Should the lede define the narrative as a "myth, in the academic sense"?
An RfC has been created at Genesis creation narrative#RfC: Should the lede define the narrative as a "myth" in the academic sense"?. Since you have been involved in this discussion, I'm informing you about it here. This is not an attempt to canvass, because people on both sides of the dispute are being notified. - Lisa (talk - contribs) 16:13, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hi Willie. I wanted to try and help you out before this gets out of hand. First off, if you make an edit, and someone reverts your edit, use the Bold-Revert-Discuss formula, rather than constant reversions to get your edit in. Just because you think an article should be a certain way, doesn't mean its the right version. This is the edit I'm mainly refering to, but there have been others.
Secondly, you seem to be lacking good faith. You are constantly pushing an argument, making it sound that any statement that doesn't conform to your POV is POV spin. These claims do not breed a collaborative culture, and make it very difficult for other editors to work with you.
This project brings in people for all across the board, with different beliefs and ideals. We may not all see eye-to-eye on everything, but we need to work together to achieve consensus and, ultimately, better the project. If you have any questions, feel free to hit me back. Ishdarian 20:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)