This is an old revision of this page, as edited by EdJohnston (talk | contribs) at 16:36, 18 September 2012 (→Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion: You can respond to the edit-warring complaint if you wish). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:36, 18 September 2012 by EdJohnston (talk | contribs) (→Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion: You can respond to the edit-warring complaint if you wish)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Hi old-timer0 I have noticed that you are having an interesting "dispute" with one or more idiots who do not seem to understand and/or have not read wp:or and wp:rs as soon as my account is auto confirmed I will join you in this fight against the person(s)who keep(s)inserting this rubbish claiming cats evolved from some prior form of life needless to say the person(s) making this absurd and utterly stupid claim apparently failed or did not take his/their biology class nor did he/they pass or take science for if he/they did he/they would know that the second law of thermodynamics prevents life forms from evolving into other life forms more complex than themselves.
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:22, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- Please see the discussion at WP:AN3#User:Old-timer0 reported by User:Ian.thomson (Result: ). You may respond there if you wish. You have not made any explanation on the talk page to give the reason for your reverts. If it's just due to your personal opposition to evolution you won't find much support here, due to WP:ARBPS. If you are just reverting so as to be colorful or eccentric, you risk being blocked for vandalism (i.e. you clearly are not serious in your edits but are just trying to get a rise out of people). EdJohnston (talk) 16:36, 18 September 2012 (UTC)